artist4perry wrote:If I don't see things your way, I am dumb, delusional, etc.
[sarcasm]Nah, there's no indoctrination coming from the atheist viewpoint, is there?[/sarcasm]

Moderator: Andrew
artist4perry wrote:If I don't see things your way, I am dumb, delusional, etc.
conversationpc wrote:artist4perry wrote:If I don't see things your way, I am dumb, delusional, etc.
[sarcasm]Nah, there's no indoctrination coming from the atheist viewpoint, is there?[/sarcasm]
artist4perry wrote:iLex wrote:My question still stands. Can anyone answer these questions please?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHJ4ztnldQ&fmt=18
And I'll add 2...
Is the catholic church still discriminating gay people?
Does the catholic church still thinks it's a sin to use condoms? (in order to fight AIDS in Africa)artist4perry wrote:You still haven't answered my question about why it is so important to knock religion,
Because religion is hurting us as a species in many ways.artist4perry wrote:Not all religions believe in modern day miracles.
MartyMoffatt wrote:
• There are dozens of major religions around the world, and hundreds if not thousands of variants on these.
• Each and every one of these religions has its followers and people who believe absolutely that it is the one true religion.
• Many of these religions, if not most, are mutually incompatible. If one is right the other is wrong.
• Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that most of them MUST be wrong, or at best misinterpreted.
• If any one of them IS wrong, despite it’s followers believing absolutely in its truth, who’s to say they are not ALL wrong.
• Anyone who asks me to believe in their religion, on faith, is basically asking me to assume that the vast majority of people in the world is stupid to believe in a false religion.
iLex wrote:My question still stands. Can anyone answer these questions please?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHJ4ztnldQ&fmt=18
And I'll add 2...
Is the catholic church still discriminating gay people?
Does the catholic church still thinks it's a sin to use condoms? (in order to fight AIDS in Africa)
etcetera wrote:iLex wrote:My question still stands. Can anyone answer these questions please?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDHJ4ztnldQ&fmt=18
And I'll add 2...
Is the catholic church still discriminating gay people?
Does the catholic church still thinks it's a sin to use condoms? (in order to fight AIDS in Africa)
The YT clip's taking forever to load at the moment, but as far as the additional 2 are concerned (although I'm quite certain that you know the answers),...
etcetera wrote:Catholicism recognizes only the male and female sexes, and it in no way condones any form of artificial birth control. Being either gay or lesbian, and resorting to contraception through means other than the natural methods, are both sins to repent for and formally confess to.
MartyMoffatt wrote:I can’t be bothered to read the whole thread so I’m not sure if this point has already been brought up or not, but my reasoning on religion is as follows:-
• There are dozens of major religions around the world, and hundreds if not thousands of variants on these.
• Each and every one of these religions has its followers and people who believe absolutely that it is the one true religion.
• Many of these religions, if not most, are mutually incompatible. If one is right the other is wrong.
• Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that most of them MUST be wrong, or at best misinterpreted.
• If any one of them IS wrong, despite it’s followers believing absolutely in its truth, who’s to say they are not ALL wrong.
• Anyone who asks me to believe in their religion, on faith, is basically asking me to assume that the vast majority of people in the world is stupid to believe in a false religion.
This doesn’t prove that all religions are false, but it raises enough doubt in my mind to put the burden of proof on those advocating their ‘truth’. Prove to me that your religion is true and maybe I’ll be converted. Just don’t ask me to take it on faith. And therein lies the problem. With all religions there is no tangible proof and faith is the key ingredient.
That’s why I remain an agnostic bordering on atheism.
artist4perry wrote:I still wonder what the purpose of all this is. It seems some wish to find fault in religion, or religious people. I personally thought this thread was do you beleive? I am not trying to convert anyone. But I sure feel the pressure of atheistic thoughts being pressed on me. If I don't see things your way, I am dumb, delusional, etc. Conversationpc it has been fun talking to you. I think if people can discuss their thoughts without blowing a gasket or feeling the need to insult or belittle others for not looking at life the way they do, they might be more fun to talk to.
MartyMoffatt wrote:I can’t be bothered to read the whole thread so I’m not sure if this point has already been brought up or not, but my reasoning on religion is as follows:-
• There are dozens of major religions around the world, and hundreds if not thousands of variants on these.
• Each and every one of these religions has its followers and people who believe absolutely that it is the one true religion.
• Many of these religions, if not most, are mutually incompatible. If one is right the other is wrong.
• Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that most of them MUST be wrong, or at best misinterpreted.
• If any one of them IS wrong, despite it’s followers believing absolutely in its truth, who’s to say they are not ALL wrong.
• Anyone who asks me to believe in their religion, on faith, is basically asking me to assume that the vast majority of people in the world is stupid to believe in a false religion.
This doesn’t prove that all religions are false, but it raises enough doubt in my mind to put the burden of proof on those advocating their ‘truth’. Prove to me that your religion is true and maybe I’ll be converted. Just don’t ask me to take it on faith. And therein lies the problem. With all religions there is no tangible proof and faith is the key ingredient.
That’s why I remain an agnostic bordering on atheism.
Rhiannon wrote:Ah, yes... but you don't have to be a follower of doctrine in order to believe in a higher power. Most times, you can look life and tell that there is something bigger than us all at work. You don't have to tithe it, you don't have to fall to your knees five times a day. There's just some little inkling inside that almost gives you your own personal proof that there is a God. I've had way too many personal experiences to be agnostic or atheist, things happen that I can't fathom. I don't believe in coincidences.
My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.) but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic.
DICTIONARY.COM wrote:No results found for survivalistic:
Did you mean survivalist ic (in dictionary) or Survivalist (in reference)?
bluejeangirl76 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Ah, yes... but you don't have to be a follower of doctrine in order to believe in a higher power. Most times, you can look life and tell that there is something bigger than us all at work. You don't have to tithe it, you don't have to fall to your knees five times a day. There's just some little inkling inside that almost gives you your own personal proof that there is a God. I've had way too many personal experiences to be agnostic or atheist, things happen that I can't fathom. I don't believe in coincidences.
My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.) but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic.
Don't think I didn't check on that.
DICTIONARY.COM wrote:No results found for survivalistic:
Did you mean survivalist ic (in dictionary) or Survivalist (in reference)?
![]()
But I like your post.
MartyMoffatt wrote:I can’t be bothered to read the whole thread so I’m not sure if this point has already been brought up or not, but my reasoning on religion is as follows:-
• There are dozens of major religions around the world, and hundreds if not thousands of variants on these.
• Each and every one of these religions has its followers and people who believe absolutely that it is the one true religion.
• Many of these religions, if not most, are mutually incompatible. If one is right the other is wrong.
• Therefore it’s reasonable to assume that most of them MUST be wrong, or at best misinterpreted.
• If any one of them IS wrong, despite it’s followers believing absolutely in its truth, who’s to say they are not ALL wrong.
• Anyone who asks me to believe in their religion, on faith, is basically asking me to assume that the vast majority of people in the world is stupid to believe in a false religion.
This doesn’t prove that all religions are false, but it raises enough doubt in my mind to put the burden of proof on those advocating their ‘truth’. Prove to me that your religion is true and maybe I’ll be converted. Just don’t ask me to take it on faith. And therein lies the problem. With all religions there is no tangible proof and faith is the key ingredient.
That’s why I remain an agnostic bordering on atheism.
Rhiannon wrote:My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.)
Rhiannon wrote:but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic. .
Enigma869 wrote:artist4perry wrote:I love you and wish you well.
Does your husband know that you love this many people![]()
![]()
![]()
John from Boston
iLex wrote:Rhiannon wrote:My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.)
Actually the process of how matter becomes life is called "abiogenesis"!
Here's a really good movie about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP ... ted&fmt=18Rhiannon wrote:but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic. .
We see many animals care about each other too, helping each other, sharing food, etc. Our brain is more complex thus so is our emotional life.
I know people love the idea that love, considered our most noble emotion, comes from a "higher" place but it doesn't. Think about the love you've felt for your ex-boyfriend ...not so divine anymore, is it?![]()
No seriously, it's all in our brain. Brain damage can turn each one of us into an emotionless psychopath. (doesn't mean dangerous)
Even out-of-body experiences can be created by brain stimulation...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/21907/
artist4perry wrote:Yes, Ha! It is called Agape love~ to love others more than yourself. Not Eros~ sexual
iLex wrote:Rhiannon wrote:My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.)
Actually the process of how matter becomes life is called "abiogenesis"!
Here's a really good movie about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP ... ted&fmt=18Rhiannon wrote:but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic. .
We see many animals care about each other too, helping each other, sharing food, etc. Our brain is more complex thus so is our emotional life.
I know people love the idea that love, considered our most noble emotion, comes from a "higher" place but it doesn't. Think about the love you've felt for your ex-boyfriend ...not so divine anymore, is it?![]()
No seriously, it's all in our brain. Brain damage can turn each one of us into an emotionless psychopath. (doesn't mean dangerous)
Even out-of-body experiences can be created by brain stimulation...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/21907/
RossValoryRocks wrote:iLex wrote:Rhiannon wrote:My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.)
Actually the process of how matter becomes life is called "abiogenesis"!
Here's a really good movie about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP ... ted&fmt=18Rhiannon wrote:but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic. .
We see many animals care about each other too, helping each other, sharing food, etc. Our brain is more complex thus so is our emotional life.
I know people love the idea that love, considered our most noble emotion, comes from a "higher" place but it doesn't. Think about the love you've felt for your ex-boyfriend ...not so divine anymore, is it?![]()
No seriously, it's all in our brain. Brain damage can turn each one of us into an emotionless psychopath. (doesn't mean dangerous)
Even out-of-body experiences can be created by brain stimulation...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/21907/
I have an idea...go be a happy atheist...and quit ragging on Christians and other faiths? Is that too much to ask?? No one here is proselytizing to you, unless you consider people making declarations of thier faith as such. What you are doing is rude, and it is uncalled for.
Enigma869 wrote:artist4perry wrote:Yes, Ha! It is called Agape love~ to love others more than yourself. Not Eros~ sexual
Thanks for the enlightenment! I think that I'm much more of an Eros kind of a guy![]()
![]()
![]()
John from Boston
Rhiannon wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:Ah, yes... but you don't have to be a follower of doctrine in order to believe in a higher power. Most times, you can look life and tell that there is something bigger than us all at work. You don't have to tithe it, you don't have to fall to your knees five times a day. There's just some little inkling inside that almost gives you your own personal proof that there is a God. I've had way too many personal experiences to be agnostic or atheist, things happen that I can't fathom. I don't believe in coincidences.
My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.) but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic.
Don't think I didn't check on that.
DICTIONARY.COM wrote:No results found for survivalistic:
Did you mean survivalist ic (in dictionary) or Survivalist (in reference)?
![]()
But I like your post.
I MAKE MY OWN WORDS!!! Especially when I think they should be words to begin with. It are all pieceifications of my linguisticalesque stategery.
iLex wrote:Rhiannon wrote:My own proof of the existence of God is in the fact that science touts we came from primal sludge (Maybe... I wasn't there, I don't know.)
Actually the process of how matter becomes life is called "abiogenesis"!
Here's a really good movie about it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP ... ted&fmt=18Rhiannon wrote:but yet, we have the capacity to love and feel and suffer and have personal growth. We have what I can only describe as a soul. Or else everyone would only ever marry for procreative purposes and be apathetic towards everyone and everything that wasn't survivalistic. .
We see many animals care about each other too, helping each other, sharing food, etc. Our brain is more complex thus so is our emotional life.
I know people love the idea that love, considered our most noble emotion, comes from a "higher" place but it doesn't. Think about the love you've felt for your ex-boyfriend ...not so divine anymore, is it?![]()
No seriously, it's all in our brain. Brain damage can turn each one of us into an emotionless psychopath. (doesn't mean dangerous)
Even out-of-body experiences can be created by brain stimulation...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/21907/
artist4perry wrote:I am not Catholic so constantly asking me about Catholic doctrine is stupid.
As for modern day miracles, I never claimed to believe in them, many don't.
As for all your insistant drivil that you are superior in intelegence because you believe I am wrong, but have no real proof I am wrong, I am yawning at the prospect.
As I said I did not come on here to convert you.
Please stop trying to force your beliefs on me.
I am just as disinterested.
Like it or not, people beleive in God, and have the Constitutional right to.
Giving questions to me from a confirmed Atheist( Who by the way was so boring, and patronizing I had to turn it off) to try and sway my faith did not work.
I do not want to, nor will I convert to your way of thinking.
I love you and wish you well.
Have a good day!![]()
![]()
![]()
artist4perry wrote: John I may not always agree with you
artist4perry wrote: but I appreciate you keeping it civil with me.
artist4perry wrote:I mean no harm in my discussions.
Rhiannon wrote:Me, well... I'd rather believe in God and be wrong than to not believe in God and be wrong.
artist4perry wrote:As for all your insistant drivil that you are superior in intelegence because you believe I am wrong, but have no real proof I am wrong, I am yawning at the prospect.
artist4perry wrote:As I said I did not come on here to convert you.
artist4perry wrote:Please stop trying to force your beliefs on me.
artist4perry wrote:I am just as disinterested.
artist4perry wrote:Giving questions to me from a confirmed Atheist (Who by the way was so boring, and patronizing I had to turn it off) to try and sway my faith did not work.
artist4perry wrote:Have a good day!![]()
![]()
![]()
iLex wrote:We see many animals care about each other too, helping each other, sharing food, etc. Our brain is more complex thus so is our emotional life.
I know people love the idea that love, considered our most noble emotion, comes from a "higher" place but it doesn't. Think about the love you've felt for your ex-boyfriend ...not so divine anymore, is it?![]()
No seriously, it's all in our brain. Brain damage can turn each one of us into an emotionless psychopath. (doesn't mean dangerous)
Even out-of-body experiences can be created by brain stimulation...
http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/editors/21907/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests