The_Noble_Cause wrote:We live in a country that has a two party system. If you don't favor the one, you favor the other, if only by default.
Nowhere have I said the Democrats are the answer, but until election reform, third parties are a waste of time.
You are beginning to catch on. Both parties have a *very* vested interest in protecting the status quo. Until the general populous realizes that and demands change, we'll plod on this destructive course.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:And aside from Olbermann, who might they be again?
Here are the ones I've personally listened to: Press, Rhodes, Franken, Hartmann, just to name a few.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I know nothing about him rephrasing his statements.
In the weeks after 9/11, he took a lot of heat for the NY Times interview. He 'clarified' the "...I feel we didn't do enough" statement by saying something to the effect he didn't mean he should have set more bombs, he meant he should have done more to protest the war. Ummm, yea, I'll gulp that down.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:He did say he was taken out of context, but whether that's true or false doesn't matter.
It does matter if he was or wasn't taken out of context & I don't believe he was. He's padding his comments because he went too far out on a limb.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Any one-dimensional monstrification of a private citizen should be cautioned against - especially when the crimes at issue happened four decades ago.
Joe the Plumber comes to mind. Back taxes & lack of a license are hardly despicable crimes but the left had no problem discrediting Joe with them.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This public demand for an apology didn't exist until he became an unwitting centerpiece in a political campaign.
Not accurate. By early 2001, he had slipped into relative obscurity in comparison to his high profile days. The coincidental timing of his book with 9/11 catapulted him back into the American consciousness to a limited extent. Discussions of his lack of remorse pre-date this election.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:The man is an educator, is extensively published, and has been recognized by his community for his accomplishments.
Karl Marx is considered by many to be an educator and is recognized far beyond the community he resided in. Whats your point?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This is not to grant him absolution, but to keep saying Barack HUSSEIN Obama "palls around with a terrorist" distorts reality, and is extremely dangerous.
HUSSEIN is his name, he should change it if he doesn't like it. My opinion, "Pals" is an exaggeration however Obama has not been completely forthcoming about this "acquaintance". Surprisingly, Anderson Cooper did a pretty damning piece on the Ayres-Obama relationship pointing out (and confirming what I suspect) is there's more to it than what the Obama campaign has admitted to.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:If the continual Boo Radley demonization of Ayers doesn't end in spilt blood, I will be greatly surprised.
I won't be shedding tears if it does. The hunter becomes the hunted, sucks to be him. Ayers wasn't concerned about spilling blood when he was planning his bombing campaigns.