It was a GREAT read, but it WAS a work of fiction; he wrote it to illustrate the decline of critical thinking in Western Civilization.
First of all, there are numerous websites (assimilated again by those pesky real scientists) that totally debunk the book. This is the best one:
http://go.ucsusa.org/global_environment ... ageID=1670[url]
[/url]
Besides, he was slammed by the scientific community for his fallacies and inaccuracies:
This novel received criticism from climate scientists, science journalists and environmental groups for inaccuracies and misleading information. Sixteen of 18 top U.S. climate scientists interviewed by Knight Ridder said the author was bending scientific data and distorting research. Several scientists whose research had been referenced in the novel stated that Crichton had distorted it in the novel.
Peter Doran, leading author of the Nature paper, wrote in the New York Times stating that
"... our results have been misused as “evidence” against global warming by Michael Crichton in his novel “State of Fear”
Myles Allen, Head of the Climate Dynamics Group, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, wrote in Nature in 2005:
"Michael Crichton’s latest blockbuster, State of Fear, is also on the theme of global warming and is likely to mislead the unwary. . . Although this is a work of fiction, Crichton’s use of footnotes and appendices is clearly intended to give an impression of scientific authority."
The Union of Concerned Scientists devote a section of their website to what they describe as misconceptions readers may take away from the book.
Jeffrey Masters, Chief meteorologist for Weather Underground, writes: "Crichton presents an error-filled and distorted version of the Global Warming science, favoring views of the handful of contrarians that attack the consensus science of the IPCC. James Hansen wrote: He (Michael Crichton) doesn’t seem to have the foggiest notion about the science that he writes about.