
Moderator: Andrew
S2M wrote:And I NEVER go into a game thinking the NE will lose.....that is different than can lose... Comic book Geek. Don't you have a costume to finish sewing for next Halloween?
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote: I NEVER go into a game thinking the Pats will lose. And neither should they.Memo to reast of the league:
NE won't lose another game this year....
Doesn't get any more HOMER or biased as this.S2M wrote:
Honestly, I've never known Trav to gloat after a win....
I'm sure you'd like to take your own advice but you can't, fanboy.
I said this right after the Cleveland game....and they didn't lose another game that year. They didn't lose for the remainder of 2010. They lost in 2011.
S2M wrote:S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote: I NEVER go into a game thinking the Pats will lose. And neither should they.Memo to reast of the league:
NE won't lose another game this year....
Doesn't get any more HOMER or biased as this.S2M wrote:
Honestly, I've never known Trav to gloat after a win....
I'm sure you'd like to take your own advice but you can't, fanboy.
I said this right after the Cleveland game....and they didn't lose another game that year. They didn't lose for the remainder of 2010. They lost in 2011.
Did you miss this on page 100, Trav?
YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:And I NEVER go into a game thinking the NE will lose.....that is different than can lose... Comic book Geek. Don't you have a costume to finish sewing for next Halloween?
Nice twisting of your words to make it sound like you are legit. You are simply a fraud and turn and twist words, EVERY TIME to support your incoherent arguments and baffling way of words. You may make fun of me being a comic book fan. Great, grand, whatever makes your ego sleep at night. I don't give a shit what anyone thinks (come to think of it, Me and RIP do have some crime to fight), ESP coming from someone who looks like a schizophrenic and the next son of sam with a gay light-blue Blue Devils visor!
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:And I NEVER go into a game thinking the NE will lose.....that is different than can lose... Comic book Geek. Don't you have a costume to finish sewing for next Halloween?
Nice twisting of your words to make it sound like you are legit. You are simply a fraud and turn and twist words, EVERY TIME to support your incoherent arguments and baffling way of words. You may make fun of me being a comic book fan. Great, grand, whatever makes your ego sleep at night. I don't give a shit what anyone thinks (come to think of it, Me and RIP do have some crime to fight), ESP coming from someone who looks like a schizophrenic and the next son of sam with a gay light-blue Blue Devils visor!
LOL...and your over-sized jew hat laden dome in your avatar is any better? Trav, my advice to you is stick to the debate at hand..no need to bring in peripheral MacGuffins to strengthen and divert attention to your having absolutely no clue as to what the main jist of the discussion is...
S2M wrote:OK, and I'm calling it right now. NE goes undefeated next year. How's that for 'homerism'?
If there is a season next year that is....and the Sox win the WS, and Celtics will win the Finals(barring injury)...I'll call all 3 right now. Hold me to it.
I know you will....![]()
![]()
You take things too seriously....
S2M wrote:OK, and I'm calling it right now. NE goes undefeated next year. How's that for 'homerism'?
If there is a season next year that is....and the Sox win the WS, and Celtics will win the Finals(barring injury)...I'll call all 3 right now. Hold me to it.
I know you will....![]()
![]()
You take things too seriously....
Rockindeano wrote:The Pats are self explanatory however, their window is closing IMO.
Seven Wishes wrote:Rockindeano wrote:The Pats are self explanatory however, their window is closing IMO.
The Pats have the second-youngest team in the NFL, 6 of the first 90 draft choices, a still-young Brady coming off his best season ever, and the best coach in the business.
They're going to be dominant for another 7-8 years - and that's assuming they're unable to eventually draft a replacement for Brady when he nears the end. Winning runs from the top of this organization all the way down. The Pats are here to stay as long as BB is the coach - and beyond that, too.
YoungJRNY wrote:Hell, as young as they were this year, they seemed to have it glued together and go on 14 wins when they weren't exactly the best team or most talented unit in football when playing together, they still looked dominant and seemed to 'get it.' That either means two things: They over-achieved OR they are going to remain one helluva force as the years move on to where they have playing time and experience playing together. Like you said, Bellichick and Brady are the forces that will keep N.E in the championship hunt & having a young team to groom is something that failing NFL franchises either don't have, or have the patience for.
Enigma869 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:Hell, as young as they were this year, they seemed to have it glued together and go on 14 wins when they weren't exactly the best team or most talented unit in football when playing together, they still looked dominant and seemed to 'get it.' That either means two things: They over-achieved OR they are going to remain one helluva force as the years move on to where they have playing time and experience playing together. Like you said, Bellichick and Brady are the forces that will keep N.E in the championship hunt & having a young team to groom is something that failing NFL franchises either don't have, or have the patience for.
It actually means both. They absolutely over-achieved, which is why Bill Belichick won the Coach of the Year award. I can't think of a single Patriots fan (outside of maybe S2M) who thought this Patriots team would get anywhere near 14 wins. I said it throughout the season on this board that I had no idea how this team just kept winning. It really starts at the top. As long as the Patriots have great ownership (and they do), they'll be successful. Pittsburgh keeps winning for a reason...the Rooney family. You can change the coach. You can change the players. You simply can't change your philosophy and your way of doing business. That's when the shit hits the fan.
The Patriots are indeed the youngest team in the NFL, so I think they'll be fine. Tom Brady certainly isn't 27 any longer, but he'll still be a viable NFL QB for at least another 3 seasons. Say what you want about Brady getting older, but I'm fairly certain that in spite of his old age, he'll be picking up another MVP trophy on Sunday.
S2M wrote: Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
S2M wrote:
So who wins Offensive ROY
S2M wrote:and Defensive ROY? However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
S2M wrote:Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
As far as I remember 4 rookies made the Pro-Bowl:
Pouncey - Center
McCourty - Corner back
Suh - DT
Mariani - Kick Returner
So who wins Offensive ROY, and Defensive ROY? I'm gonna say Pouncey for Offense, and McCourty for Defense. However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
As far as I remember 4 rookies made the Pro-Bowl:
Pouncey - Center
McCourty - Corner back
Suh - DT
Mariani - Kick Returner
So who wins Offensive ROY, and Defensive ROY? I'm gonna say Pouncey for Offense, and McCourty for Defense. However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
Bradford and Suh.
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
As far as I remember 4 rookies made the Pro-Bowl:
Pouncey - Center
McCourty - Corner back
Suh - DT
Mariani - Kick Returner
So who wins Offensive ROY, and Defensive ROY? I'm gonna say Pouncey for Offense, and McCourty for Defense. However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
Bradford and Suh.
Bradford didn't even make the Pro-Bowl...
YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
As far as I remember 4 rookies made the Pro-Bowl:
Pouncey - Center
McCourty - Corner back
Suh - DT
Mariani - Kick Returner
So who wins Offensive ROY, and Defensive ROY? I'm gonna say Pouncey for Offense, and McCourty for Defense. However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
Bradford and Suh.
Bradford didn't even make the Pro-Bowl...
Yeah, but it's measured as rookies and what kind of an impact they've had on their respective teams. Bradford was one game away from entering the post-season and had a pretty damn GOOD year and progress as a rookie. I can see it going to Bradford or Pouncey but usually a Quarterback from a rebuilding team gets the nod.
S2M wrote:
Bradford didn't even make the Pro-Bowl...
S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:S2M wrote:Question.....is Devin McCourty getting ROY?
As far as I remember 4 rookies made the Pro-Bowl:
Pouncey - Center
McCourty - Corner back
Suh - DT
Mariani - Kick Returner
So who wins Offensive ROY, and Defensive ROY? I'm gonna say Pouncey for Offense, and McCourty for Defense. However, Suh could win based on all the pre-season hype surrounding his draft status....
Bradford and Suh.
Bradford didn't even make the Pro-Bowl...
Yeah, but it's measured as rookies and what kind of an impact they've had on their respective teams. Bradford was one game away from entering the post-season and had a pretty damn GOOD year and progress as a rookie. I can see it going to Bradford or Pouncey but usually a Quarterback from a rebuilding team gets the nod.
Well if that's the case then by your definiton Devin should get it. 7 INTs as a rookie - with only 17 passes defended. That's an interception 41% of the time., and NE was 14-2.....Detroit 6-10. And sorry John, McCourty had not only more total tackles 82 to Suh's 66, but more solo tackles 69 to 49...and it is tougher to tackle in the open field than it is amoungst 16 other fat fucks.....lol
S2M wrote:10 sacks = offensive still has the ball...
7 INTS = TURNOVER, offense lost the ball.
82 tackles > than 66 tackles.
basic math, Trav....
More polished team? NE = YOUNGEST team in the NFL. Starting the most rookies on defense. Check your facts, man....![]()
![]()
S2M wrote:Speaking of the Steelers....they were lucky even to win the AFC north. Stevie Johnson doesn't drop that GIMME in OT. Pitt doesn't win the North, and limps into the playoffs on the ROAD.![]()
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests