President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

[Boomchild]

So through all the Nixon scandals, Nixon got pegged with the nickname "Tricky Dick". What do you think would be a good nickname for B.O.?

[steveo777]

So through all the Nixon scandals, Nixon got pegged with the nickname "Tricky Dick". What do you think would be a good nickname for B.O.?

Barry "cat sand box" Soetoro?

[slucero]

So through all the Nixon scandals, Nixon got pegged with the nickname "Tricky Dick". What do you think would be a good nickname for B.O.?

"The Impeachable Won"

[steveo777]

Listen to this:
This is just freaking sexy to hear a woman going for throats!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHJ2QZq3 ... r_embedded

[The Sushi Hunter]

joseph curl‏@josephcurl 8m, CIA source says Fox News scandal the "4th Shoe"; says it goes much deeper; says WH also sitting on "something" that has top aides terrified.

Look closely and you can just about see BOzo, Biden and the entire clown posse administration's face going up into the cloud.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwlNPhn64TA&NR=1

[Memorex]

joseph curl‏@josephcurl 8m, CIA source says Fox News scandal the "4th Shoe"; says it goes much deeper; says WH also sitting on "something" that has top aides terrified.

I think what everyone has to be asking themselves is, why now? This is just too much coincidence at once. This administration does nothing that isn't calculated. And it's the administration that is releasing all the info. Why do it all at once? It's definitely not just to get it all out and be done with it.

I heard that Republican bundlers are having a hard time getting donations because people are afraid they will be targeted. In America? That's crazy. People should be afraid to donate based on stupidity, not their government coming after them.

I thing the Justice Department really needs to explain what the real threat was to justify going after a reporter's personal email. I think that's over the line. And I think Obama would think so too. You'd think, anyway.

[The Sushi Hunter]

joseph curl‏@josephcurl 8m, CIA source says Fox News scandal the "4th Shoe"; says it goes much deeper; says WH also sitting on "something" that has top aides terrified.

I think what everyone has to be asking themselves is, why now? This is just too much coincidence at once. This administration does nothing that isn't calculated. And it's the administration that is releasing all the info. Why do it all at once? It's definitely not just to get it all out and be done with it.

I heard that Republican bundlers are having a hard time getting donations because people are afraid they will be targeted. In America? That's crazy. People should be afraid to donate based on stupidity, not their government coming after them.

I thing the Justice Department really needs to explain what the real threat was to justify going after a reporter's personal email. I think that's over the line. And I think Obama would think so too. You'd think, anyway.

Last week Holder said it had something to do with terrorist groups in the middle east, today I'm hearing Holder saying it had something to do with North Korean nuclear missile testing.

The only thing I've read in regards to why this information is being released now is because BO and various administration members knew about these things well in advanced, but realized that these things were about to be made public by other sources. So BOzo and various clown posse administration players released the information hoping that by them doing so would have less negative impact compared to if other souces released it.

As for what's being said today, I find it very interesting how all these people who did all this corrupt bullshit on BOzo's watch is claiming they didn't tell him any of this stuff was happening and going on. Fucking hilarious.

[Boomchild]

joseph curl‏@josephcurl 8m, CIA source says Fox News scandal the "4th Shoe"; says it goes much deeper; says WH also sitting on "something" that has top aides terrified.

I think what everyone has to be asking themselves is, why now? This is just too much coincidence at once. This administration does nothing that isn't calculated. And it's the administration that is releasing all the info. Why do it all at once? It's definitely not just to get it all out and be done with it.

I heard that Republican bundlers are having a hard time getting donations because people are afraid they will be targeted. In America? That's crazy. People should be afraid to donate based on stupidity, not their government coming after them.

I thing the Justice Department really needs to explain what the real threat was to justify going after a reporter's personal email. I think that's over the line. And I think Obama would think so too. You'd think, anyway.

In my opinion, if you are aware that scandals are going to come out sooner or latter, you would rather have it come out as far away from the next election cycle in hopes that people will forget most of it or be "over it" by election time.

[Boomchild]

As for what's being said today, I find it very interesting how all these people who did all this corrupt bullshit on BOzo's watch is claiming they didn't tell him any of this stuff was happening and going on. Fucking hilarious.

It's hilarious and scary at the same time because the bathwater drinking Obama supporters will actually believe that B.O. knew little if nothing about this stuff until now. Classic example, I was sitting next to a guy wearing an Obama t-shirt on the bus today and asked if he thought B.O. knew about the IRS deal before reading it in the news and he said he believes that B.O. was being truthful.

[steveo777]

WTF is up with Obama's approval rating being as high as it is? My only guess is that his supporters don't care about liberty and freedom, nor do they care about personal accountability. These are the sheep that need structure and need to be lead by the nose, while getting as much free shit as they can from the government. These are the same ones who, as long as they are getting fed, will turn the blind eye on all of B.O.'s faults and remain in hibernation to his true agenda. There are also some who just don't give a shit, have no moral compass and even some of those are working an agenda that aligns with this administration, so as to sustain their lifestyles of drinking off the government teet. All you have to do is watch a few episodes of reality tv, Dr. Phil, Judge Judy, etc., and it's very clear what kind of social decay this country is in. This kind of president serves those kinds the best and their ranks are growing.

[conversationpc]

WTF is up with Obama's approval rating being as high as it is? My only guess is that his supporters don't care about liberty and freedom, nor do they care about personal accountability.

They also don't believe their messiah can ever be responsible for anything bad anywhere. I would feign to guess that they'd even forgive him and shrug it off if he came out and admitted that he was personally responsible for the IRS scandal.

[Boomchild]

WTF is up with Obama's approval rating being as high as it is? My only guess is that his supporters don't care about liberty and freedom, nor do they care about personal accountability. These are the sheep that need structure and need to be lead by the nose, while getting as much free shit as they can from the government. These are the same ones who, as long as they are getting fed, will turn the blind eye on all of B.O.'s faults and remain in hibernation to his true agenda. There are also some who just don't give a shit, have no moral compass and even some of those are working an agenda that aligns with this administration, so as to sustain their lifestyles of drinking off the government teet. All you have to do is watch a few episodes of reality tv, Dr. Phil, Judge Judy, etc., and it's very clear what kind of social decay this country is in. This kind of president serves those kinds the best and their ranks are growing.

I think it because there's a mix in his supporters that has nothing to do with how Obama is or is not governing. You have the no information or low information supporters. The ones that support him because they think he's hip or cool and that makes him a better president. The ones that are like drones or sheep like you said. Those that support him simply because he is the first African American President and will support him no matter what because of that connection. It's become more of a popularity contest then in the past which is one of the major problems with it. The amount of people on governmental support has been a problem for a long time. Even before Obama. It's just that Obama seems to focus more on it then past Presidents. It makes people easier to manipulate and control when you have them relying of "the system".

[The Sushi Hunter]

WTF is up with Obama's approval rating being as high as it is?

BOzo + High Ratings = PROPAGANDA

Whoever is claiming BOzo's ratings are high are probably getting that information by polling only the individuals who lay around the house in their underwear until 5pm every day.

[Memorex]

I believe 100% in the constitutional right to not incriminate yourself. And she has every right to take the 5th. But that really pisses me off. Take the fifth, but the president ought to require her termination immediately. If you head the most intrusive agency in our government, or a division of it, and you cannot see fit to explain to the American people what happened, then you have no business working for this government. I'm so fed up with these career government snobs acting as if they can do anything and not answer for it. All parties.

Of course, by taking the fifth she will protect all who need protecting and will be rewarded with a pardon if it ever came to that.

All of these folks, regardless of party, should go to jail.

WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd.

Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

[The Sushi Hunter]

WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd.

Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Yeah buddy, saw that. So predictable. We all know that policies and procedures criteria is established from the top. I say we water board that bitch.

[Rick]

WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd.

Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Yeah buddy, saw that. So predictable. We all know that policies and procedures criteria is established from the top. I say we water board that bitch.

Like these motherfuckers didn't lie about anything. smh

[Boomchild]

So while listening to the radio today a commercial comes on sponsored by some conservative group that supports immigration reform. It had sound bites from Sen. Marco Rubio in which he said that we currently have "de facto amnesty". So I guess instead he thinks it's better to have carte blanche, link chain immigration for illegals. Additionally he goes on to describe what these people "in the shadows" will have to do and that they will not be eligible for government support benefits. This is a lie, since the most recent reports on the bill being presented does allow for them to be eligible for benefits right away. Marco Rubio is so wet behind the ears to not see that this "gang of eight" bill was a sham from the start. Another thing is the only requirement for securing the border will be that they have to "create a plan" to build fencing. WTF, they did that during the last amnesty bill during the Regan administration and never completed the job. This shit really angers me. Rubio is a liberal in conservative clothing.

[Rick]

So while listening to the radio today a commercial comes on sponsored by some conservative group that supports immigration reform. It had sound bites from Sen. Marco Rubio in which he said that we currently have "de facto amnesty". So I guess instead he thinks it's better to have carte blanche, link chain immigration for illegals. Additionally he goes on to describe what these people "in the shadows" will have to do and that they will not be eligible for government support benefits. This is a lie, since the most recent reports on the bill being presented does allow for them to be eligible for benefits right away. Marco Rubio is so wet behind the ears to not see that this "gang of eight" bill was a sham from the start. Another thing is the only requirement for securing the border will be that they have to "create a plan" to build fencing. WTF, they did that during the last amnesty bill during the Regan administration and never completed the job. This shit really angers me. Rubio is a liberal in conservative clothing.

You know what it is. Amnesty will give them citizenship, which will increase tax revenue. That's all it is. Upping the tax base.

[Boomchild]

So while listening to the radio today a commercial comes on sponsored by some conservative group that supports immigration reform. It had sound bites from Sen. Marco Rubio in which he said that we currently have "de facto amnesty". So I guess instead he thinks it's better to have carte blanche, link chain immigration for illegals. Additionally he goes on to describe what these people "in the shadows" will have to do and that they will not be eligible for government support benefits. This is a lie, since the most recent reports on the bill being presented does allow for them to be eligible for benefits right away. Marco Rubio is so wet behind the ears to not see that this "gang of eight" bill was a sham from the start. Another thing is the only requirement for securing the border will be that they have to "create a plan" to build fencing. WTF, they did that during the last amnesty bill during the Regan administration and never completed the job. This shit really angers me. Rubio is a liberal in conservative clothing.

You know what it is. Amnesty will give them citizenship, which will increase tax revenue. That's all it is. Upping the tax base.

Not the ones that will be going on SSI, food stamps etc.. Their income level won't be enough to owe federal taxes. If that is the point then don't offer SSI, food stamps etc to them. They won't need it since they will earn enough to support themselves and pay taxes. If this were totally true then the U.S.government would have no need to have a partnership with Mexico to promote the U.S. food stamp program in Mexico. It's more about politicians salivating over the thought of more voters for their respective party.

[Rick]

So while listening to the radio today a commercial comes on sponsored by some conservative group that supports immigration reform. It had sound bites from Sen. Marco Rubio in which he said that we currently have "de facto amnesty". So I guess instead he thinks it's better to have carte blanche, link chain immigration for illegals. Additionally he goes on to describe what these people "in the shadows" will have to do and that they will not be eligible for government support benefits. This is a lie, since the most recent reports on the bill being presented does allow for them to be eligible for benefits right away. Marco Rubio is so wet behind the ears to not see that this "gang of eight" bill was a sham from the start. Another thing is the only requirement for securing the border will be that they have to "create a plan" to build fencing. WTF, they did that during the last amnesty bill during the Regan administration and never completed the job. This shit really angers me. Rubio is a liberal in conservative clothing.

You know what it is. Amnesty will give them citizenship, which will increase tax revenue. That's all it is. Upping the tax base.

Not the ones that will be going on SSI, food stamps etc.. Their income level won't be enough to owe federal taxes. If that is the point then don't offer SSI, food stamps etc to them. They won't need it since they will earn enough to support themselves and pay taxes. If this were totally true then the U.S.government would have no need to have a partnership with Mexico to promote the U.S. food stamp program in Mexico. It's more about politicians salivating over the thought of more voters for their respective party.

Those statistics aren't what they're relying on.

[Boomchild]

Those statistics aren't what they're relying on.

Which, the ones that won't have enough income to be required to pay taxes or that they will have a pool of future voters for their party? Regardless, no matter what angle you look at this subject it is a lose\lose result for the country. Just like the last amnesty bill that was suppose to resolve the massive illegal immigration problem for good. They will never enforce the guidelines for accepting these people. The government can't even effectively enforce the immigration laws and border security as it stands now. Were supposed to believe that they will this time. Yeh right.

[steveo777]

Those statistics aren't what they're relying on.

Which, the ones that won't have enough income to be required to pay taxes or that they will have a pool of future voters for their party? Regardless, no matter what angle you look at this subject it is a lose\lose result for the country. Just like the last amnesty bill that was suppose to resolve the massive illegal immigration problem for good. They will never enforce the guidelines for accepting these people. The government can't even effectively enforce the immigration laws and border security as it stands now. Were supposed to believe that they will this time. Yeh right.

Obama is the last guy who will secure the border for all the reasons stated. I'm amazed at how often I am accused of being a racist because I believe that our laws should be enforced and that those who break them should not be rewarded, but be punished. I speak of people who are on welfare illegally, who get earned income tax credits, illegally, of people who drive our medical insurance costs up, because they go to hospitals with no legitimate status here and don't have to pay their bills. These costs are offset onto the average legal working american. All of these benefits (some call them entitlements) have skyrocketed under this administration. If we cut off all benefits to illegals, we could chuck them all back over the fence and save so much money that we might actually be able to balance the budget and reduce the national debt.

Why over half the nation, apparently, doesn't see fault in the model above is just mind boggling. Where do people think this is all gonna end up? Can they not see that there is no bottomless money pit and that eventually those funds will dry up and there will be a price to pay.....for everyone? The average American voter is uninformed, underinformed, or just plain doesn't care about our country anymore. They're hooked on charisma and popularity without regard for the issues.

[steveo777]

A friend of mine share this with me:

...her name is Valerie Jarrett, she is the Senior White House Advisor to Barack Obama. He doesn't make a move, or a statement without consulting Valerie Jarrett first. Valerie was brought into the Obama White House, because both Barack and Michelle owe her, "big time". Make no mistake about Jarrett's power over Obama and the rest of the cabinet. Valerie is an A-1 Communist/Socialist/Progressive, and she isn't afraid to admit it. Her goals are every bit as lofty as Obama's goals. However, it is Valerie Jarrett's evil and diabolical mind that sets the stage, makes the plans and her orders are carried out to the "T"!!!



Trying to figure out Valerie Jarrett’s mysterious hold on Barack and Michelle Obama is a favorite guessing game in the parlors and dining rooms of Washington. No other White House official in history has enjoyed such a unique relationship with both a president and a first lady, and yet the mainstream media have ignored Jarrett’s enormous influence over the shape and direction of the Obama administration.

Jarrett’s official title — senior adviser and assistant to the president for intergovernmental affairs and public engagement — doesn’t begin to do justice to her unrivaled status in the White House. She is Ground Zero in the Obama operation — the first couple’s first friend and consigliere, the last person to leave the Oval Office after meetings, and the only White House official who dines with the first family in their private quarters at night.

“She functions as the eyes, ears, and nose of the president and first lady. She tells them who’s saying what about who, who’s loyal and who’s not. She advises them about who they should see when they visit a city or a foreign country. She determines who gets invited to the White House and who is left out in the cold.”

In the White House pecking order, Jarrett has more clout than the president’s chief of staff. During the savage internecine warfare between Jarrett and Obama’s first two chiefs of staff — Rahm Emanuel and Bill Daley — Obama sided with Jarrett, a classic limousine liberal who believes that Obama was elected president in order to engineer social change. Ultimately, Jarrett emasculated Emanuel and Daley and forced them from their jobs.

She has also been responsible for much of the incompetence and amateurism that have been the hallmarks of Obama’s time in office. Indeed, Jarrett has been on the wrong side of practically every consequential issue to come across the president’s desk. Some examples of her bonehead advice:

● Though both Emanuel and political strategist David Axelrod warned Obama time and again that he didn’t have the votes to ram a comprehensive healthcare bill through Congress, Jarrett was among those who persuaded the president to ignore their advice and go for broke. The result: the hugely expensive, unworkable, unpopular, and probably unconstitutional program known as Obamacare.

● Emanuel tangled with Jarrett over her effort to put the prestige of the presidency behind Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. Emanuel believed that Jarrett was working on behalf of her old boss, Mayor Daley, and his political cronies, who stood to benefit from the billions of dollars that would be spent on the Olympics. That idea seemed to be lost on the president, who went to Copenhagen to make an impassioned plea for the Olympics, and came back home with egg on his face.

● Jarrett gave her stamp of approval for the $535 million taxpayer-funded loan guarantee to Solyndra, the California solar company that went belly up. Jarrett had close ties to the George Kaiser Family Foundation, which controlled 35.7 percent of Solyndra. The foundation had made a sizable donation to the University of Chicago Medical Center, where Jarrett once served as chairwoman and where one of Obama’s best friends, Eric Whitaker, is currently executive vice president.

● When Jarrett pushed Obama’s proposal to require church-run hospitals and universities to give their employees free contraception, chief of staff Bill Daley secretly arranged an Oval Office meeting between the president and New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan, the head of the U.S. Conference of Catholic bishops, who argued that the policy violated the principle of religious freedom. When Jarrett learned about Daley’s end-run, she went to the president and vented her anger. After that, Daley realized his days were numbered and resigned.

[The Sushi Hunter]

Like these motherfuckers didn't lie about anything. smh

Ok Rick, before I jump to any conclusions here, please tell us of these “lies” and don’t include conspiracy theory accusations. Comparing Bush and his administration to the current is like comparing day to night. While Bush was in office, no Democratic parties were specifically singled out and targeted by the IRS, no AP phone records were ever secretly “acquired”, no type of Benghazi cover up occurred, etc. Bush didn’t even have any relatives living illegally in the U.S. I don't even recall a point where Bush used Democrats as the cause for not being able to do his job, unlike BOzo and his clown Posse Administration do on a bimonthly basis from day one.

[The Sushi Hunter]

Amnesty will give them citizenship, which will increase tax revenue. That's all it is. Upping the tax base.

That's the biggest bunch of bullshit I've read here in a long time. In order to increase tax revenue, jobs have to be worked. There are NO jobs available, unless you're thinking about the workforce shifter - "factor out" the American born whites from the workforce and refill those jobs with no-whites. That's the only thing that's going on in regards to jobs right now. So Rick, your a baggage handler right? As soon as your company decides there are too many American born whites working for them, you'll be "factored out". Good luck.

[conversationpc]

Like these motherfuckers didn't lie about anything. smh

Ok Rick, before I jump to any conclusions here, please tell us of these “lies” and don’t include conspiracy theory accusations. Comparing Bush and his administration to the current is like comparing day to night. While Bush was in office, no Democratic parties were specifically singled out and targeted by the IRS, no AP phone records were ever secretly “acquired”, no type of Benghazi cover up occurred, etc. Bush didn’t even have any relatives living illegally in the U.S. I don't even recall a point where Bush used Democrats as the cause for not being able to do his job, unlike BOzo and his clown Posse Administration do on a bimonthly basis from day one.

My three biggest strikes against the Bush administration:

1 - The Patriot Act...Perhaps the single worst piece of legislation ever passed by our government (until possibly recently).
2 - Compean & Ramos...What the Bush administration put these two border guards through in the name of appeasing Mexico was criminal.
3 - Medicare presription drugs...This cost and is costing us WAAAAAAAAAY more money than any good it's doing. This point may be moot now that we're headed towards full implementation of Obamacare but I believe it helped pave the way at the very least.

[The Sushi Hunter]

Like these motherfuckers didn't lie about anything. smh

Ok Rick, before I jump to any conclusions here, please tell us of these “lies” and don’t include conspiracy theory accusations. Comparing Bush and his administration to the current is like comparing day to night. While Bush was in office, no Democratic parties were specifically singled out and targeted by the IRS, no AP phone records were ever secretly “acquired”, no type of Benghazi cover up occurred, etc. Bush didn’t even have any relatives living illegally in the U.S. I don't even recall a point where Bush used Democrats as the cause for not being able to do his job, unlike BOzo and his clown Posse Administration do on a bimonthly basis from day one.

My three biggest strikes against the Bush administration:

1 - The Patriot Act...Perhaps the single worst piece of legislation ever passed by our government (until possibly recently).
2 - Compean & Ramos...What the Bush administration put these two border guards through in the name of appeasing Mexico was criminal.
3 - Medicare presription drugs...This cost and is costing us WAAAAAAAAAY more money than any good it's doing. This point may be moot now that we're headed towards full implementation of Obamacare but I believe it helped pave the way at the very least.

Where are the lies? I can understand if they did something you didn't agree with, but it was mentioned that Bush flat out lied and I want to know what these lies were.

[Rick]

Like these motherfuckers didn't lie about anything. smh

Ok Rick, before I jump to any conclusions here, please tell us of these “lies” and don’t include conspiracy theory accusations. Comparing Bush and his administration to the current is like comparing day to night. While Bush was in office, no Democratic parties were specifically singled out and targeted by the IRS, no AP phone records were ever secretly “acquired”, no type of Benghazi cover up occurred, etc. Bush didn’t even have any relatives living illegally in the U.S. I don't even recall a point where Bush used Democrats as the cause for not being able to do his job, unlike BOzo and his clown Posse Administration do on a bimonthly basis from day one.

You people telling Democrats they're koolaid drinkers is fucking hilarious.

Here, get yourself some of this. http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/ ... twenty-one

That should keep you busy for the day. Even if it's slanted, it can't all be wrong.

[Rick]

Amnesty will give them citizenship, which will increase tax revenue. That's all it is. Upping the tax base.

That's the biggest bunch of bullshit I've read here in a long time. In order to increase tax revenue, jobs have to be worked. There are NO jobs available, unless you're thinking about the workforce shifter - "factor out" the American born whites from the workforce and refill those jobs with no-whites. That's the only thing that's going on in regards to jobs right now. So Rick, your a baggage handler right? As soon as your company decides there are too many American born whites working for them, you'll be "factored out". Good luck.

Negative, genius. Taxes need to be paid on jobs that are being worked by illegals who aren't and even can't pay taxes.

[The Sushi Hunter]

WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups.

Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd.

Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

She did that today. If she had nothing to hide or anyone to protect, she'd not have to invoke the fifth. Obviously she's a dirty player in this current shithole admininstration.