Boomchild wrote:
Lol. These are great.
Moderator: Andrew
Boomchild wrote:
Monker wrote:How about you reread what you replied to. I said "dictate what type (of) people post in this forum". IE: I'm a Democrat, I'm not libertarian - with a small 'l' - not a party member, etc. You and KC BOTH do that. It is an example of "holier than thou" attitude in that you do not allow people to define themselves, you both desire to define the people who post here. You do it over, and over and over again.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:How about you reread what you replied to. I said "dictate what type (of) people post in this forum". IE: I'm a Democrat, I'm not libertarian - with a small 'l' - not a party member, etc. You and KC BOTH do that. It is an example of "holier than thou" attitude in that you do not allow people to define themselves, you both desire to define the people who post here. You do it over, and over and over again.
Exposing you as the DNC-ass licking shill you are by using your own words ("Hillary had permission to use a private server!") is not "dictating" anything. Sorry. I welcome posters with varying political opinions. By all means, let's have some anarchists, LaRouche fanatics, and Marxists up in here to shake things up.
Monker wrote:Second, bringing up Franken at all is a "distraction" in a thread dedicated to Donald Trump.
Monker wrote:But, when they start throwing out labels and try to define who I am - THAT is wrong.
Monker wrote:I consistently label you Trump Zombies because you brainlessly follow your fuhrer.
Monker wrote:What is left here is a bunch of Trump zombies.
Monker wrote:But, of course facts do not matter to the Trump zombies in this forum.
Monker wrote:And, this is why you Trump zombies should be worried about stupid shit like Charlottesville.
Monker wrote:That is because you followed your leader's Tweets, like a bunch of mindless zombies.
Monker wrote:The only ones who don't trust him are t-virus infected Trump zombies, like you.
Monker wrote:u all are too busy being Trump zombies and discussing Clinton as a distraction from is really going on in the world.
Monker wrote:Yes, I call you Trump supporters zombies because you mindlessly repeat things like I blame Putin for Clinton losing and don't accept that she lost.
Monker wrote:Trump could very easily make any excuse to start a war with North Korea, and you and KC and the rest of his zombies would be all for it.
Monker wrote:You are a bunch of fucking dumb, t-Virus infected, Trump zombies. Fucking STUPID.
Fact Finder wrote:Weinstein
Franken
Charlie Rose
Menendez
Conyers
Oliver Stone
Dreyfus
Glen Thrush![]()
Shit, it's only Tuesday...
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:
If they get to the Music Industry, almost all of them will be in trouble. You can bet they won't. There's no Republican Seats up for grab there.
Moores Council has the right to what ever they have.
It's a case of what are they hiding.
Again, she doesn't have to win, just keep this in the news until after the election.
Monker wrote:
If anything you are acting like you are unable to talk about Trump in a Trump forum.
Umm, this is a Trump THREAD. Not a forum. The Obama thread was a political free-for-all. Discussion was not limited exclusively to Obama. You are making up your own rules and trying to play traffic cop here.
Monker wrote:If you actually kept things in context for once you would see that I am replying to Boom saying I was deflecting a topic being discussed...so in essence he is making up rules on how I should post and I am replying saying he doing the EXACT SAME THING but on a higher level. So, of pme pf is "making up rules" then we both are.
Monker wrote:
But, when they start throwing out labels and try to define who I am - THAT is wrong.
LMAO. So labels are bad, eh? Can you be any bigger of a hypocritical shitbag? Again, your words speak for themselves....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monker wrote:
I consistently label you Trump Zombies because you brainlessly follow your fuhrer.
Monker wrote:
What is left here is a bunch of Trump zombies.
Monker wrote:
But, of course facts do not matter to the Trump zombies in this forum.
Monker wrote:
And, this is why you Trump zombies should be worried about stupid shit like Charlottesville.
Monker wrote:
That is because you followed your leader's Tweets, like a bunch of mindless zombies.
Monker wrote:
The only ones who don't trust him are t-virus infected Trump zombies, like you.
Monker wrote:
u all are too busy being Trump zombies and discussing Clinton as a distraction from is really going on in the world.
Monker wrote:
Yes, I call you Trump supporters zombies because you mindlessly repeat things like I blame Putin for Clinton losing and don't accept that she lost.
Monker wrote:
Trump could very easily make any excuse to start a war with North Korea, and you and KC and the rest of his zombies would be all for it.
Monker wrote:
You are a bunch of fucking dumb, t-Virus infected, Trump zombies. Fucking STUPID.
Monker wrote:LOL...I guess you can't tell the difference between a political party label and Trumpian insult label. Too funny!
Besides, it seems for every Republican caught in a sex scandle, six or more liberals are getting outted. Hey Monker, you catching the Charlie Rose show today? I love his defense," I didn't know my advances were unwanted at the time".
Sad thing is, he could be right, but no one wants to admit that. After all, women are so weak, right? They can't even slap a face, scream, or simply get up and walk out. right? Most guys seem to get out of the mood with a good fist in the face. It's the ones that don't that should be exposed.Of course calling the police is out of the question.
Monker wrote:
LOL...I guess you can't tell the difference between a political party label and Trumpian insult label. Too funny!
Back to childish word games again.
Monker wrote:Yeah, isn't it childish to call people things like "Crooked Hillary", or "Little Marco", or "Al Frankestein". But, it seems to be the type of childish behavior Trump Zombies like you understand and relate to.
Monker wrote:
If you actually kept things in context for once you would see that I am replying to Boom saying I was deflecting a topic being discussed...so in essence he is making up rules on how I should post and I am replying saying he doing the EXACT SAME THING but on a higher level. So, of pme pf is "making up rules" then we both are.
Bullshit. Changing the subject when replying to a specific post (which is what Boomchild was referring to) is completely different from saying X can be discussed but Y cannot - which is what you do all the time.
You are trying to lay down ground rules on a website where you have no power. In fact, the webmaster has accurately called you a tool multiple times.
Monker wrote:You are lying again. I did NOT say X "can not" be discussed.
Monker wrote: If you want a generic "politics" thread, then start one...but this one is supposedly about the Donald Judas Trump presidency. It is not MY fault that he is a failure by almost all ways of measurement.
Monker wrote:I am NOT trying to make up rules. I have not done that AT ALL.
Monker wrote:You are getting into territory you know NOTHING about. Andrew and I have not had ANY issues in years and years...The only time was way back when Deano was here. I would LOVE for you to quote the last time he critiqued me in any way - and include the date. I would be curious to see it. If I had to guess, it would be 2011 or so...six years ago - at least.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:You are lying again. I did NOT say X "can not" be discussed.
And you are lying saying that I am lying.
You have repeatedly tried to instruct posters on what is acceptable subject matter in this thread. To that I say - go fuck yourself.
Monker wrote: If you want a generic "politics" thread, then start one...but this one is supposedly about the Donald Judas Trump presidency. It is not MY fault that he is a failure by almost all ways of measurement.
How come you didn't make such demands in the Obama thread?
Monker wrote:I am NOT trying to make up rules. I have not done that AT ALL.
Trying to define the parameters of a thread you didn't start on a website you don't run is doing EXACTLY that. People can post whatever the hell they want.
Monker wrote:You are getting into territory you know NOTHING about. Andrew and I have not had ANY issues in years and years...The only time was way back when Deano was here. I would LOVE for you to quote the last time he critiqued me in any way - and include the date. I would be curious to see it. If I had to guess, it would be 2011 or so...six years ago - at least.
And in six years, Andrew has come to change his views on you being a complete dickhead? I don't think so. In fact, I know so.
Monker wrote:
The sad thing is that most people don't even know what "net neutrality" is and how it affects their internet connection and experience. This is just one more bad thing that Trump is doing.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Monker said "The $145million has already been debunked. Almost ALL of it was donated prior to Clinton even being SOS, or the donars even working for Rostodad, or whatever. So, there is NOTHING THERE. The $500,000 speaking fee...so what? The only thing new is the informant guy...but all I have read so far is him ragging on Russia corruption. He really hasn't proved anything yet, other than the Russian government is corrupt...like we didn't already know that."
1. The money went through a Canadian Bank into the Canadian branch of the Clinton Foundation. Makes it much harder to trace in America.
2.No, Clinton was not SOS. She was a Senator.
3.Your reading Media cover up bullshit as usual and very soon your going to look like an ass, as you should. Campbell is being protected as he should right now. The Clintons, Obama, Holder, Mueller, and even the CIA have much to worry about. It's coming out. Just because you want to post bullshit about it doesn't stop the truth.
Monker wrote:Prove to me that you are not a liar. Find the post and quote where I said "X can not be discussed in this thread". In fact, find a post where I have said that in ANY thread on this forum. I do not dictate how Andrew runs his forum.
Monker wrote:Fine, post it to the correct forum. That has NOTHING to do with Donald Jackass Trump and his presidency.
Monker wrote:If you want to engage me in the off-topic bullshit, then it should be posted to the correct forum where it is just bullshit and not off topic.
Monker wrote:If you TRULY wanted to discuss these things, you would do it in the other thread - where it is on topic and not a distraction. dsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Monker wrote:Nope. I am simply pointing out that you all do not post about Trump in a Trump thread. I think it is fucking hilarious. The guy is a such a complete disaster that even his zombies can't hold conversation about him because they are so ashamed of him. Too funny!
Monker wrote:Nobody accused me of deflection in the Obama thread. If they had I would have said similar things. And, it's not a demand...you took that out of context.
Monker wrote:Dude, a thread is a topic of conversation. That infers the posts in the thread will be about the topic. That is just plain common sense.
Monker wrote:When a person does not want to talk about the topic, they go on and on about something else...which Boom describes as deflection. Deflection is what you guys do here, by HIS definition...a definition YOU agreed to.
Monker wrote:Now, if you all want to deflect away from the thread topic. That is your choice. It is MY choice to point out the hypocrisy if I choose to. Nobody is making demands or making up rules. That is all in your imagination.
Monker wrote:Why are you acting like a Toph? Six years ago Andrew and I exchanged a couple Emails and we haven't had any issues with each other since. If he ever wants me to leave, all he has to do is tell me, privately or publicly - it's up to him. I will leave without questioning his authoritah. That's the way it is.
Monker wrote:
Prove to me that you are not a liar. Find the post and quote where I said "X can not be discussed in this thread". In fact, find a post where I have said that in ANY thread on this forum. I do not dictate how Andrew runs his forum.
No problem. Here are a bunch of quotes where you attempt to dictate what can and cannot be posted here. This is just a few of many.
And just how much of the Obama thread was comprised of Obama policy talk? Very little. So what's your point?
Monker wrote:
Nobody accused me of deflection in the Obama thread. If they had I would have said similar things. And, it's not a demand...you took that out of context.
Oh please. Your MO of changing the subject when caught in a lie has been going on forever in all sorts of threads. You are just a rotten dishonest bastard.
Monker wrote:
Dude, a thread is a topic of conversation. That infers the posts in the thread will be about the topic. That is just plain common sense.
Everybody in here is talking about Trump or politics.
Politics is not off-topic at all.
Monker wrote:
When a person does not want to talk about the topic, they go on and on about something else...which Boom describes as deflection. Deflection is what you guys do here, by HIS definition...a definition YOU agreed to.
You are generalizing. If somebody responds to a specific post by changing the subject, THAT is deflection.
However, it is not deflection to use this thread to say something about Schumer or Paul Ryan being an asshole. This a political thread.
Monker wrote:
Now, if you all want to deflect away from the thread topic. That is your choice. It is MY choice to point out the hypocrisy if I choose to. Nobody is making demands or making up rules. That is all in your imagination.
Telling people to use separate threads to post content you don't approve of is making up rules.
[/quote][/quote]Monker wrote:
Why are you acting like a Toph? Six years ago Andrew and I exchanged a couple Emails and we haven't had any issues with each other since. If he ever wants me to leave, all he has to do is tell me, privately or publicly - it's up to him. I will leave without questioning his authoritah. That's the way it is.
I think he would like all of us to leave and shut these forums down tbh. That is separate from him thinking you are a contender for a lifetime MR dickhead award.
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:You don't read much, do you. It's also been explained in detail in several Hannity posts I made last week by John Soloman and Sara Carter, along with Campbells lawyer. But I guess for you, over 10,000 dociments isn't enough. Besides, why do you care? You're not a Democrat so if Obama, Clinton, Holder, Mueller, ect go down, what do you care?
K.C.Journey Fan wrote:Monker wrote:K.C.Journey Fan wrote:You don't read much, do you. It's also been explained in detail in several Hannity posts I made last week by John Soloman and Sara Carter, along with Campbells lawyer. But I guess for you, over 10,000 dociments isn't enough. Besides, why do you care? You're not a Democrat so if Obama, Clinton, Holder, Mueller, ect go down, what do you care?
I don't believe anything Hannity has to say. Do you own a Kuerig?
10,000 documents are not enough when you will need a TARDIS to make something be true.
I don't care if they get thrown in jail. I care that this entire thing is made up conspiracy theory and a lie....and now my tax money is being spent pursuing it.
So now you know how Trump feels. Only difference is, this stuff on Clinton isn't something she paid to have made up. It's for real. It doesn't matter if your that stupid, it won't make it any less real, and it's about to unload.
Monker wrote:
The sad thing is that most people don't even know what "net neutrality" is and how it affects their internet connection and experience. This is just one more bad thing that Trump is doing.
Fact Finder wrote:
and she doesn't have it. Don does.
Monker wrote:I care that this entire thing is made up conspiracy theory and a lie....and now my tax money is being spent pursuing it.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests