They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[steveo777]

I wonder what would happen to someone like Monker in prison?

[Monker]

Well, a few things.

No, that was not supposed to be public.

But, finding it on Google is not an excuse. Posting pics of my children is FAR out of bounds...regardless of how easy or hard it is to find them.

Then, offering it up to anybody who requests is, frankly, perverted.

THAT is inexcusable behavior....indefensible. Those who defend it are also just as wrong and perverted.

I do not expect saying the above to matter, because, like true Trump zombies, you will never admit a mistake. Those here would NEVER say, "I was wrong, I should not have done that." Like a Trump zombie you will make excuses for the inexcusable, you will defend the indefensible...repeatedly. Because you can not admit any wrong.

The ONLY request I made to Andrew was to remove the posts which contained the pic. I did not ask for threads to be closed or people to be kicked off. I did not say it was a "private" pic...only that it was a pic that included my children and I wanted it removed.

I'm done here. I'm not going to be an active member to a forum where the other members feel it is OK to post pictures of other members children. That is a forum where members are out of control and have lost all sense of morality. It is not the type of forum I want to be a part of.

[Memorex]

Well, a few things.

No, that was not supposed to be public.

But, finding it on Google is not an excuse. Posting pics of my children is FAR out of bounds...regardless of how easy or hard it is to find them.

Then, offering it up to anybody who requests is, frankly, perverted.

THAT is inexcusable behavior....indefensible. Those who defend it are also just as wrong and perverted.

I do not expect saying the above to matter, because, like true Trump zombies, you will never admit a mistake. Those here would NEVER say, "I was wrong, I should not have done that." Like a Trump zombie you will make excuses for the inexcusable, you will defend the indefensible...repeatedly. Because you can not admit any wrong.

The ONLY request I made to Andrew was to remove the posts which contained the pic. I did not ask for threads to be closed or people to be kicked off. I did not say it was a "private" pic...only that it was a pic that included my children and I wanted it removed.

I'm done here. I'm not going to be an active member to a forum where the other members feel it is OK to post pictures of other members children. That is a forum where members are out of control and have lost all sense of morality. It is not the type of forum I want to be a part of.

I'd like to see TNC agree that it's not something that should be done. But this situation does not represent the forum as a whole. So I think running off is not the answer. But you are the one in this situation, so I can't tell you how to feel.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Well, a few things.

No, that was not supposed to be public.

But, finding it on Google is not an excuse. Posting pics of my children is FAR out of bounds...regardless of how easy or hard it is to find them.

Then, offering it up to anybody who requests is, frankly, perverted.

THAT is inexcusable behavior....indefensible. Those who defend it are also just as wrong and perverted.

I do not expect saying the above to matter, because, like true Trump zombies, you will never admit a mistake. Those here would NEVER say, "I was wrong, I should not have done that." Like a Trump zombie you will make excuses for the inexcusable, you will defend the indefensible...repeatedly. Because you can not admit any wrong.

The ONLY request I made to Andrew was to remove the posts which contained the pic. I did not ask for threads to be closed or people to be kicked off. I did not say it was a "private" pic...only that it was a pic that included my children and I wanted it removed.

I'm done here. I'm not going to be an active member to a forum where the other members feel it is OK to post pictures of other members children. That is a forum where members are out of control and have lost all sense of morality. It is not the type of forum I want to be a part of.

Oh yes, I still have your photo. And I have photoshopped all sorts of big veiny dicks creaming on your face. You'll probably want to check Craigslist ads in your hometown quite frequently.

Buzzinga!

[Memorex]

Gotta say I'm really shocked at this. I hope I'm not the minority. It's just flat out wrong.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Gotta say I'm really shocked at this. I hope I'm not the minority. It's just flat out wrong.

Keep clutching your pearls, Francis. What's public is public.

[Boomchild]

Gotta say I'm really shocked at this. I hope I'm not the minority. It's just flat out wrong.

When you turn the conversation into taunting someone or an outright personal attack you take the risk of not knowing what you are going to get in return. Personally, this is not my thing and I don't do it. Nor do I tend to respond to such things. I can't really agree with the notion that Monker is some kind of victim in this situation.

[verslibre]

Without taking a side in this fiasco —

Gotta say I'm really shocked at this. I hope I'm not the minority. It's just flat out wrong.

When you turn the conversation into taunting someone or an outright personal attack you take the risk of not knowing what you are going to get in return. Personally, this is not my thing and I don't do it. Nor do I tend to respond to such things. I can't really agree with the notion that Monker is some kind of victim in this situation.

But my posting a joke-pic was "character assassination"? Get real.

[slucero]

its pretty ironic when Monker is offended by someone posting some thing "private".... that was freely found on the internet... especially since he's the one who has consistently maintained that the government has been hacking peoples private data well before William Binney made that conspiracy theory, conspiracy fact.

bottom line... he should have known that once you put something out on the interwebs, its permanently there.

[Memorex]

Man, this is all super jacked up. No matter - Andrew set the rule and so there it is. But you all need to step back and check your attitudes on this stuff. This board should be for this board only, unless someone brings their own info here. And that should be true across all boards. And in life. It's actually kind of gross to think otherwise, in my opinion.

I'm no fan of Monker's views and even his method of arguing. But I am a fan of being fair and mature.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Man, this is all super jacked up. No matter - Andrew set the rule and so there it is. But you all need to step back and check your attitudes on this stuff. This board should be for this board only, unless someone brings their own info here. And that should be true across all boards. And in life. It's actually kind of gross to think otherwise, in my opinion.

I'm no fan of Monker's views and even his method of arguing. But I am a fan of being fair and mature.

"Their own info".... so yet again you are making a fake distinction. It's not your own private info when it's made public. Both you and Monker keep using weasel words to articulate your opinion. You forfeit the right to any claim of ownership when you voluntarily expose your underwear to the town square.


Last thing I will say about this matter....


Monker was the one unapologetically exploiting his children. First, he exposed them to strangers on the internet in attempt to get laid (he's like guys that get a dog to meet women in the park). Now he is hiding behind the alleged sanctity of his family to defend his own poor choices. Where was this concern when he decided to use them as a cheap cyber prop? Not only should the Secret Service pay him an overdue visit, but Child Protective Services should come bolting through his door asap.

[Memorex]

Man, this is all super jacked up. No matter - Andrew set the rule and so there it is. But you all need to step back and check your attitudes on this stuff. This board should be for this board only, unless someone brings their own info here. And that should be true across all boards. And in life. It's actually kind of gross to think otherwise, in my opinion.

I'm no fan of Monker's views and even his method of arguing. But I am a fan of being fair and mature.

"Their own info".... so yet again you are making a fake distinction. It's not your own private info when it's made public. Both you and Monker keep using weasel words to articulate your opinion. You forfeit the right to any claim of ownership when you voluntarily expose your underwear to the town square.


Last thing I will say about this matter....


Monker was the one unapologetically exploiting his children. First, he exposed them to strangers on the internet in attempt to get laid (he's like guys that get a dog to meet women in the park). Now he is hiding behind the alleged sanctity of his family to defend his own poor choices. Where was this concern when he decided to use them as a cheap cyber prop? Not only should the Secret Service pay him an overdue visit for his demented comments towards the president, but Child Protective Services should come bolting through his door asap.

Lots of people post pictures of their kids - it doesn't make it a CPS thing. Relax.

I have a lot of public info. Not hard to find I imagine. But when I come here I expect to be Memorex and whatever I bring in. I expect to know you as TNC and whatever you bring in. I do not expect for either of us to go out and find that public info and post it here for others to see. Seems like basic common sense and courtesy to me.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Lots of people post pictures of their kids - it doesn't make it a CPS thing. Relax.

On dating sites? Not really.

I have a lot of public info. Not hard to find I imagine.

Posted as Memorex?

Seems like basic common sense and courtesy to me.

Guess you haven't been paying attention. Monker said he was here to play games with people. Common sense and courtesy went out the window a long time ago.

[Boomchild]

Seems like basic common sense and courtesy to me.

Monker, who started the chain of events, has shown zero courtesy to others on this board. I doubt he even knows what it means.

[Memorex]

Seems like basic common sense and courtesy to me.

Monker, who started the chain of events, has shown zero courtesy to others on this board. I doubt he even knows what it means.

Again, I'm not a fan of Monker's style by any means. But when comparing it to others, he was certainly fighting more than fair. Right or wrong, it was in the realms of what I think is acceptable. He was an asshole and people were assholes back to him. He called names, they called names. All perfectly fine for whoever wants to participate. He did not show anyone the level of disrespect of going and finding personal info and posting it here where he did not bring that himself. You all can spin it any way you want but that is just discourteous. At the end of the day, we have to be able to shake hands and go back to our corners.

By the way - fuck all of you for making me defend Monker. Something I never wanted to do. I need a shower now.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Again, I'm not a fan of Monker's style by any means. But when comparing it to others, he was certainly fighting more than fair. Right or wrong, it was in the realms of what I think is acceptable. He was an asshole and people were assholes back to him. He called names, they called names. All perfectly fine for whoever wants to participate. He did not show anyone the level of disrespect of going and finding personal info and posting it here where he did not bring that himself. You all can spin it any way you want but that is just discourteous. At the end of the day, we have to be able to shake hands and go back to our corners.

By the way - fuck all of you for making me defend Monker. Something I never wanted to do. I need a shower now.

Finding "personal info" that is publicly posted and available to ANYBODY. Why don't you give it a rest? You're just making up bullshit and inventing rules of privacy that don't even apply to this situation.

[Memorex]

Again, I'm not a fan of Monker's style by any means. But when comparing it to others, he was certainly fighting more than fair. Right or wrong, it was in the realms of what I think is acceptable. He was an asshole and people were assholes back to him. He called names, they called names. All perfectly fine for whoever wants to participate. He did not show anyone the level of disrespect of going and finding personal info and posting it here where he did not bring that himself. You all can spin it any way you want but that is just discourteous. At the end of the day, we have to be able to shake hands and go back to our corners.

By the way - fuck all of you for making me defend Monker. Something I never wanted to do. I need a shower now.

Finding "personal info" that is publicly posted and available to ANYBODY. Why don't you give it a rest? You're just making up bullshit and inventing rules of privacy that don't even apply to this situation.

Finding is the issue.

I would not go through someone's medicine cabinet if they allowed me in their bathroom.
I would not look in someone's glove box if they allowed me to borrow their car.
I would not look up a friend's voting record because I could and it's public.
I would not go through someone's mail if they had me house sit.
I would not search court records on a friend or colleague.
I absolutely would not post someone's dating a profile and their personal pictures on a site that has zero to do with that info.

I would bring these same level of rules with me anywhere I go, online or in person. It's basic decency. You don't have to like Monker, but you should respect his presence here. He has every right to this place as you.

[Boomchild]

Again, I'm not a fan of Monker's style by any means. But when comparing it to others, he was certainly fighting more than fair. Right or wrong, it was in the realms of what I think is acceptable. He was an asshole and people were assholes back to him. He called names, they called names. All perfectly fine for whoever wants to participate. He did not show anyone the level of disrespect of going and finding personal info and posting it here where he did not bring that himself. You all can spin it any way you want but that is just discourteous. At the end of the day, we have to be able to shake hands and go back to our corners.

By the way - fuck all of you for making me defend Monker. Something I never wanted to do. I need a shower now.

The point is Monker doesn't show respect at all. In fact he is always quick to tell you "he doesn't give a shit". But when he comes up on the losing end of a "cat fight" suddenly he wants to be a victim, wants respect and some sort of protection. Perhaps he was looking for one of those "safe spaces" we have heard so much about. I had no dog in this "fight". I saw the post in question and moved on without giving it any thought. The more you dwell on it the more "effect" it has.

[Memorex]

Again, I'm not a fan of Monker's style by any means. But when comparing it to others, he was certainly fighting more than fair. Right or wrong, it was in the realms of what I think is acceptable. He was an asshole and people were assholes back to him. He called names, they called names. All perfectly fine for whoever wants to participate. He did not show anyone the level of disrespect of going and finding personal info and posting it here where he did not bring that himself. You all can spin it any way you want but that is just discourteous. At the end of the day, we have to be able to shake hands and go back to our corners.

By the way - fuck all of you for making me defend Monker. Something I never wanted to do. I need a shower now.

The point is Monker doesn't show respect at all. In fact he is always quick to tell you "he doesn't give a shit". But when he comes up on the losing end of a "cat fight" suddenly he wants to be a victim, wants respect and some sort of protection. Perhaps he was looking for one of those "safe spaces" we have heard so much about. I had no dog in this "fight". I saw the post in question and moved on without giving it any thought. The more you dwell on it the more "effect" it has.

Guess as a long time member of this little club, I'm putting my vote in that we never do that shit again. That's all.

[Boomchild]

I would not go through someone's medicine cabinet if they allowed me in their bathroom.
I would not look in someone's glove box if they allowed me to borrow their car.
I would not look up a friend's voting record because I could and it's public.
I would not go through someone's mail if they had me house sit.
I would not search court records on a friend or colleague.
I absolutely would not post someone's dating a profile and their personal pictures on a site that has zero to do with that info.

A person's medicine cabinet is not in the public domain.
A person's glove box is not in the public domain.
A person's mail is not in the public domain.

What was done here is a search in the public domain on the internet. Anyone and especially Monker whom has explained his knowledge of the internet would know the risks of putting personal information on it. You are going about this as if TNC hacked his personal accounts.

I would bring these same level of rules with me anywhere I go, online or in person. It's basic decency. You don't have to like Monker, but you should respect his presence here. He has every right to this place as you.

Respect is earned. If you don't give it yourself then you can't expect to be given it. Monker decided to take the conversation to a personal level. That was his choice. If he didn't I doubt we would be discussing this topic.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Guess as a long time member of this little club, I'm putting my vote in that we never do that shit again. That's all.

You're the same guy who said: "However, I had not been reading (and still haven't) what led up to it."

Why are you now trying to be the voice of moral reason? You have no context and no clue. Move on!

And as a "long time member" you would know this is not the first time this happened to Monker on these forums. Why does it happen? Because he's an asshole.

[Memorex]

Ok. Topic debated and hashed. No one has learned anything and we move. That sounds about par for this place.

I hope all of you take a little of that tax saving money and send some Drew's way. Babysitting is not cheap these days.

[Boomchild]

Hey Boomer, I think Trump is starting to put his foot on the back of Sessions neck. About time.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-attack ... 23643.html

What I have to say is this. Perhaps there is more going on then meets the eye when it comes to Sessions. Perhaps some of my past assertions are wrong. In a very short time I am may know the answer to that. Lastly I'll state one other thing Q-anon.

[Boomchild]

Ok. Topic debated and hashed. No one has learned anything and we move. That sounds about par for this place.

I hope all of you take a little of that tax saving money and send some Drew's way. Babysitting is not cheap these days.

Memorex I believe your heart is in the right place. I just think it's being wasted on a individual that doesn't deserve it. Keep in mind this person has said he doesn't give a damn what people think or feel.

[Memorex]

Ok. Topic debated and hashed. No one has learned anything and we move. That sounds about par for this place.

I hope all of you take a little of that tax saving money and send some Drew's way. Babysitting is not cheap these days.

Memorex I believe your heart is in the right place. I just think it's being wasted on a individual that doesn't deserve it. Keep in mind this person has said he doesn't give a damn what people think or feel.

One thing I've learned in recent years - It's important that people always do the right thing despite the actions of others. That's what I tend to live by now, so maybe that is just coming through.

For example, Hillary did wrong and it's important our justice department get off their ass and do the right thing.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... andling-of

[Boomchild]

For example, Hillary did wrong and it's important our justice department get off their ass and do the right thing.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... andling-of

All I can about this subject is I think there is more going on then meets the eye. One just has to look for it and have patience.

[Memorex]

I'll say this as my last point on this subject. Over the years, there have been people here that were in situations or whatever. I have sent them money, often electronically. Often to be picked up from wire places. So this entails including my email, name, etc. While I have nothing to hide I would hope that there are a set of rules here that say no matter what goes down, personal details are held in the strictest of confidence. Sure, there is a difference between that and a public dating profile. But I'd just prefer we treat it all the same. And in that regard, I cannot feel Monker deserved it no matter how much of an asshole he was being. Anyway, I'm just repeating myself. I get it.

[verslibre]

For example, Hillary did wrong and it's important our justice department get off their ass and do the right thing.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... andling-of

All I can about this subject is I think there is more going on then meets the eye. One just has to look for it and have patience.

Robots in disguise!!

[Monker]

I'll say this as my last point on this subject. Over the years, there have been people here that were in situations or whatever. I have sent them money, often electronically. Often to be picked up from wire places. So this entails including my email, name, etc. While I have nothing to hide I would hope that there are a set of rules here that say no matter what goes down, personal details are held in the strictest of confidence. Sure, there is a difference between that and a public dating profile. But I'd just prefer we treat it all the same. And in that regard, I cannot feel Monker deserved it no matter how much of an asshole he was being. Anyway, I'm just repeating myself. I get it.

Thank you for speaking out and expressing your values. I wish there were a dozen more people like you on this forum...but it seems you are alone. You are essentially in an "anything goes" forum...not by Andrew's choice but by the choice of the people who post here. And, I am NOT critiquing Andrew in any way.

And, you are correct - there is absolutely NO EXCUSE for posting pictures of other people's children. It's wrong.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Thank you for speaking out and expressing your values. I wish there were a dozen more people like you on this forum...but it seems you are alone.

Wait. I thought you didn't care about anyone else's opinion? Now you are hoping the MR cavalry will charge to your defense? LOL!

You are essentially in an "anything goes" forum...not by Andrew's choice but by the choice of the people who post here.

You are staunchly against this place being “anything goes” the same way you claim to be against name-calling (except when you do it to everyone else).
More lies, more hypocrisy. Spare us.

And, you are correct - there is absolutely NO EXCUSE for posting pictures of other people's children. It's wrong.

No. YOUR picture was posted, you assfaced bitch. You just happened to have kids in the background. That's on you. You used them as props to get ass and now you continue to use them to excuse your stupidity. Every time you comment in this thread, I photoshop another dick on your ugly mug. By all means, keep yapping.