Eric wrote:Monker wrote:He needs to get a band together, go out with whoever he wants, play whatever he wants, but leave the name "Journey" alone

But why shouldn't the guy who started it all and the guy who brought it all back in the late 90's without Perry be able to use Journey in the name of a band he has?
For the same reason the guys who started "Little River Band" can not use the name in reference to their band and merchandise. Neal Schon does not own the name.
Its insane.
It's the law.
I'm not arguing this purely from a legal standpoint, I'm arguing it from a POV of fairness and common sense.
Neal took it to court where the POV of fairness and common sense is much less important than the contracts and documents he signed. Ross asked the court to decide who owns the Journey name. That is where things are now - in the hands of the court.
That Valory would take issue with Schon doing Journey through Time is absolutely disgusting.
There was an article that I read that there was to be marketing for JTT that obviously would have convoluted the Journey and JTT trademarks. Also, Neal has made statements about JTT and Journey which could be used in all of this. There is more to
this than just starting a new band.
Again, Valory and Smith did not object to JTT - NIGHTMARE did.
It's bitter, weasly and lacks loyalty.
Do you even realize the irony of that statement? Neal is the person publicly brought this out. Neal is he one firing people. Neal is the one who started JTT because he was not happy with Journey. But, you think it is "weasley" for the complay that owns Journey to protect its asset. That makes no sense.