Soledad? wrote:Are you still talking?
Stop posting inane pablum and maybe I'd have a reason not to.
Soledad? wrote:So it's okay to lash out at Perry for choosing a non-musical path
Who's lashing?
You said the Rolling Stones have maintained their original lead singer and obviously knew a good thing when they see it. As if to say, Journey somehow didn't recognize or appreciate a good thing when they see it (i.e. Perry).
To which I rebutted, Journey
does recognize a good thing when they see it, but unfortunately that particular person doesn't want to work anymore.
You make it sound like Journey cut ties with Perry when he was salivating and chomping at the bit to get back to work.
That's bogus.
The guy's been habitually languid dating as far back as the Frontiers tour.
Soledad? wrote:but it's not okay to question the musical talents of the other members of Journey?
You're not "questioning" anything, you're extenuating.
Perry's gone from the music scene because
HE ALONE chooses to do so.
Not because Neal, Jon, or Ross are "less talented".
What kind of sense does that make?
Perry is out of the limelight by
HIS OWN volition.
Your anger is misplaced.
Soledad? wrote:This place reeks of hypocrisy.
And you reek of tendentiousness.
Soledad? wrote:PS I actually think Neal is enormously talented.
That's not what you implied a few posts above.
Perhaps I should introduce you to this boards' other resident schizo, Joe.