ohsherrie wrote: What I meant was that you guys seem to expect some kind of altruism from Steve, but when Neal or Jon makes a remark that's a lot more overtly cutting about Steve you think that's just too cool.
Umm, those guys *know* Steve. Ok?
They shared a career with Steve. They are entitled to make comments about their fellow bandmate.
If Perry was slighting Jon, Ross, or Neal it'd be a different story.
That'd be understandable
But Perry doesn't know Augeri and should at least respect the guy as a fellow working musician and not a "whatever"
Augeri may be able to sing the songs in a higher range at this time, but it's not in as high a range as Steve recorded them, and the strain is already getting to him too.
But Perry's range fluctuated throughout his entire tenure in Journey.
What the fuck are you talking about?
You don't think Augeri is singing in a higher range then Perry was during ROR or TBF?
Think again.
Augeri actually sings the songs more like the record.
Many times Perry would speed them up, garble words and make them sound like abject ass.
ohsherrie wrote:It's very unlikely that Augeri's voice, or writing contributions, could have propelled Journey to the heights that Steve's did in the '80s because he's just not that outstanding.
Do you own any of Augeri's previous non-Journey records?
No, you don't.
Which begs the question, just who are you to comment on Augeri's abilities?
His non-Journey works blow Perry's non-Journey works right out of the water.
ohsherrie wrote: Why should Steve feel obligated to give honorable mention to the man who is out there replacing him in a band that's success was due in large part to Steve's work?
Who the hell is talking about "honorable mentions"?
Showing a modicum of respct by not referring to the guy an an inanimate "whatever" would be in your eyes "an honorable mention"? We're just saying that Perry should show a fellow musician (whom he doesn't know) a little respect!
ohsherrie wrote:That's fairytales shit Dean. It doesn't happen in real life where real passions are in play, and I'd think it was phoney PC/PR/BS if Steve were to try and say he appreciated Augeri.
You're full of shit, Sherrie.
Someone in this very thread posted an interview where the original singer of Judas Priest is now buds with his replacement singer. Furthermore, MANY artists show respect for their fellow workers in the music biz.
Why does that seem so unbelievable to you?
When you were a teacher, would you routinely flip off your fellow co-workers?
I didn't think so.
ohsherrie wrote: Why is it that MOST of the Perry related threads here are started by people who aren't in your Loon catagory if you guys don't want to talk about him?
You're lying. Again.
ohsherrie wrote:Why are those threads invariably the most popular ones if you guys don't want to talk about him?
Because we end up quarelling with people like you.
ohsherrie wrote:Why do you want to talk about someone that you profess to think so little of? It has to be because you enjoy ragging on him, but why is that? Could it be because you feel you need to justify the existence of the band today and making Steve look bad helps you do that in some way? Could it be that you want so badly for someone to give you some dirt on him in a interview so you can say, "See, we're right to like Augeri better."?
No, no, and no.
The Perry threads invariably end up being a popular topic because many Journey fans waste their time pointing out the endless hypocrisies and lies of people like you.
ohsherrie wrote:Even if it were true that Steve is a less than noble, honorable man(like Neal is,

)
Once again. Neal isn't slighting a musician he doesn't know.
Perry is slighting a man who has shown nothing but the utmost respect. BIG difference.
ohsherrie wrote:Then if someone tries to post something supportive of Steve in response, or even just disagrees with your point of view, you all start screaming LOONS LOONS LOONS. It seems that it's not only taboo to say anything the least bit negative about the band if your a professed Perry person, you're also not allowed to say anything positive about Steve, even if it's true.
But it so rarely is true.
Andrew says Perry's management told him directly that because he supports the current band he would not be granted an interview.
What do you old maids do?
Immediately go into *spin* mode and deny, deny, deny.
Something remotely not a kiss-ass compliment about our Lord!
-Egads! It simply can't be true!
So u impugn Andrew's repuation and call the man a liar! It is this very denialist thinking that we see time and time again.
You people aren't honest about *ANYTHING*, when it comes to Perry.
You're zombified zealot practioneers of blind idolatry.
In a word,
"LOONS!"ohsherrie wrote:I can't remember the last time I saw a post as abusive of Augeri as what I see a lot of here about Perry. But that's OK, no........................
Maybe that's because Augeri hasn't overstepped his purview and fucked up the band yet. Augeri didn't fire people. He didn't take over creative control and make the shittiest record in all of Journey history.
He didn't feign injuries and cancel tours.
If you can think of something negative to post about Augeri then go ahead be my guest.
Besides, I've been going out of my way to bash Augeri every day of the year so far because of his stupid song, "Believe".
So don't say current fans aren't critical of Augeri, because we are.