Moderator: Andrew
heardonthestreet wrote:I'm convinced that someone brought this to Dean's attention and I wish that Dean would reveal this. It will give more credence to Deans theory. Was it simply observation, rumor or someone in the know spilling the beans. Deans change of heart was too abrupt to be a long time suspicion.
2Late4Goodbyes wrote:How do we know Deano isn't secretely involved with the band in some way?
Just a thought.
barneyrubble wrote:No-one could seriously think that they'd be using a track from 2001 DVD can they? You'd record the backing during 2005 tour rehearsals or any studio session. The idea of the Vegas track as a source is a wind up.
jrnyman28 wrote:It started near the end of last tour and gained steam with the announcement and subsequent cancellation of the Chile Show. Once Deano heard about the private gig in Hawaii it seemed to consume Deano...
cetera wrote:They didn't play Chile (due to supposed flu) but they played a 'private' gig in Hawaii....
That sounds like they were gonna be paid HUGE money to play a private gig so came up with the 'flu' excuse to scrap Chile. Excuse my ignorance.... but whats' tapegate' got to do with that....?
swepett wrote:cetera wrote:They didn't play Chile (due to supposed flu) but they played a 'private' gig in Hawaii....
That sounds like they were gonna be paid HUGE money to play a private gig so came up with the 'flu' excuse to scrap Chile. Excuse my ignorance.... but whats' tapegate' got to do with that....?
I think the point was, how could they play Hawaii if they couldn't play Chile because of a flu? A flu would be as bad in Hawaii as in Chile. As for coming up with the flu just to get out of a gig, I think most contracts state a band need confirmation from a doctor to get out of a scheduled concert.
cetera wrote:swepett wrote:I think the point was, how could they play Hawaii if they couldn't play Chile because of a flu? A flu would be as bad in Hawaii as in Chile. As for coming up with the flu just to get out of a gig, I think most contracts state a band need confirmation from a doctor to get out of a scheduled concert.
I'm sure that could be arranged when there's HUGE payoff from a private gig.
swepett wrote:cetera wrote:swepett wrote:I think the point was, how could they play Hawaii if they couldn't play Chile because of a flu? A flu would be as bad in Hawaii as in Chile. As for coming up with the flu just to get out of a gig, I think most contracts state a band need confirmation from a doctor to get out of a scheduled concert.
I'm sure that could be arranged when there's HUGE payoff from a private gig.
So which is worse, accusing the band of using tapes or accusing them of contract fraud?
It was a former member of this board-ERICheardonthestreet wrote:I'm convinced that someone brought this to Dean's attention and I wish that Dean would reveal this. It will give more credence to Deans theory. Was it simply observation, rumor or someone in the know spilling the beans. Deans change of heart was too abrupt to be a long time suspicion.
cetera wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:It started near the end of last tour and gained steam with the announcement and subsequent cancellation of the Chile Show. Once Deano heard about the private gig in Hawaii it seemed to consume Deano...
They didn't play Chile (due to supposed flu) but they played a 'private' gig in Hawaii....
That sounds like they were gonna be paid HUGE money to play a private gig so came up with the 'flu' excuse to scrap Chile. Excuse my ignorance.... but whats' tapegate' got to do with that....?
jrnyman28 wrote:First off, it was "supposedly" Pneumonia. But Pit alluded to something much more serious. Second, it is entirely possible that SA was nearly recovered from the ailment, but the doctor's were being cautious so the band scrubbed the Chile show giving SA one more week to recover. Also, I do not recall the specific dates, but I think there was more than a week between the two dates...but I could be wrong, won't be the first time!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests