AR wrote:Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found - and we invade on faulty intelligence
?
Well, poor intelligence is more of proper title. Actually it was a lie. A fucking LIE.
Moderator: Andrew
AR wrote:Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found - and we invade on faulty intelligence
?
Rockin'Deano wrote:AR wrote:Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found - and we invade on faulty intelligence
?
Well, poor intelligence is more of proper title. Actually it was a lie. A fucking LIE.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Rockin'Deano wrote:St. John,
I noticed you never answered the Tower 7 question.
Also, I see you are very pro military, yet never served. I am not hounding you, but it is awfully easy to be pro war, pro GI Joe, and Never go and serve.
Comments?
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Rockin'Deano wrote:AR wrote:Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found - and we invade on faulty intelligence
?
Well, poor intelligence is more of proper title. Actually it was a lie. A fucking LIE.
RaiderFan wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:St. John,
I noticed you never answered the Tower 7 question.
Also, I see you are very pro military, yet never served. I am not hounding you, but it is awfully easy to be pro war, pro GI Joe, and Never go and serve.
Comments?
By that logic, have you ever been a lead vocalist of a mega-million selling rock band? No? Well you can't say anything anti-Augeri.
Saint John wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:AR wrote:Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that were never found - and we invade on faulty intelligence
?
Well, poor intelligence is more of proper title. Actually it was a lie. A fucking LIE.
For a guy that had no weapons of mass distruction he sure as fuck liked to play hide and seek with UN Weapons Inspectors.....when he even let them into the country. Are you guys telling me that you believe this guy who killed millions, boasted about what he'd unleash if we invaded, and played "the shell game" with UN inspectors, suddenly took all of his bio and chemical weapons and simply destroyed them? They were shipped out of the country because that puke from France alerted his buddy Hussein that we weren't fucking around this time. The UN played paddie cake with this fucker for so long he actually thought we didn't have any balls to invade. He must not have noticed the change in the White House.
RaiderFan wrote:
Yeah a lie that was uttered on more than 1 occasion by Clinton and congressional democrats. Don't forget Putin and many foreign leaders also.
Rockin'Deano wrote:RaiderFan wrote:
Yeah a lie that was uttered on more than 1 occasion by Clinton and congressional democrats. Don't forget Putin and many foreign leaders also.
A lie about getting your Johnson smoked is a helluva lot different than "They have weapons of mass destruction."
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Lula wrote:Saint John, do you listen to Sean Hannity?
Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John, do you listen to Sean Hannity?
No, I do not....if you are referring to radio. However, I do watch the show...maybe once a week.
Rockin'Deano wrote:St. John,
I noticed you never answered the Tower 7 question.
Also, I see you are very pro military, yet never served. I am not hounding you, but it is awfully easy to be pro war, pro GI Joe, and Never go and serve.
Comments?
Rockin'Deano wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John, do you listen to Sean Hannity?
No, I do not....if you are referring to radio. However, I do watch the show...maybe once a week.
I would love to debate that cocksucker just once. I love how he has Alan Combs in there, so he can steamroll him nightly. Put me in there, and FOX News would be a different game, I guarantee you that.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
Rockin'Deano wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John, do you listen to Sean Hannity?
No, I do not....if you are referring to radio. However, I do watch the show...maybe once a week.
I would love to debate that cocksucker just once. I love how he has Alan Combs in there, so he can steamroll him nightly. Put me in there, and FOX News would be a different game, I guarantee you that.
Rockin'Deano wrote:Tower 7 was another tower, about a third of the size of the Twins...It had billions of dollars in the concrete basement that was moved out a couple days BEFORE all this shit happened. It also had computer records of various trading and money transfers of prominent gov't officials and their buddies financial dealings....
..Now...Tower 7 wasn't hit by any aircraft. Hmm..Why or better yet, how, did that mysteriously fall, thus destroying all evidence?
Saint John wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:Saint John wrote:Lula wrote:Saint John, do you listen to Sean Hannity?
No, I do not....if you are referring to radio. However, I do watch the show...maybe once a week.
I would love to debate that cocksucker just once. I love how he has Alan Combs in there, so he can steamroll him nightly. Put me in there, and FOX News would be a different game, I guarantee you that.
Sean Hannity has been begging Hillary, Jesse Jackson and many other prominent democrats to come on the show. Sadly, they know they're ideologically retarded so they stay away. The only one with balls is Sharpton, even though he makes an ass of himself monthly.
conversationpc wrote:Rockin'Deano wrote:Tower 7 was another tower, about a third of the size of the Twins...It had billions of dollars in the concrete basement that was moved out a couple days BEFORE all this shit happened. It also had computer records of various trading and money transfers of prominent gov't officials and their buddies financial dealings....
..Now...Tower 7 wasn't hit by any aircraft. Hmm..Why or better yet, how, did that mysteriously fall, thus destroying all evidence?
This and almost ALL the ridiculous conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked. The only reason people believe this crap is because of blind hatred for George Bush.
From "Popular Mechanics" http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... page=5&c=y
"WTC 7 Collapse
CLAIM: Seven hours after the two towers fell, the 47-story WTC 7 collapsed. According to 911review.org: "The video clearly shows that it was not a collapse subsequent to a fire, but rather a controlled demolition: amongst the Internet investigators, the jury is in on this one."
FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom--approximately 10 stories--about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.
NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.
According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."
There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.
Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."
WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors--along with the building's unusual construction--were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse."
Also, here's a picture showing the southwest corner of building 7, which was taken out by falling debris from one of the collapsing trade center towers...
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
conversationpc wrote:This and almost ALL the ridiculous conspiracy theories have been thoroughly debunked. The only reason people believe this crap is because of blind hatred for George Bush.
treetopovskaya wrote:so what are we all doing to make the world a better place? complaining about things really gets us nowhere... what are you personally doing to make things better? first place to start is in your home/community. i see here a lot of people bitching about george bush but what are YOU doing to make things better?
negate the hate! }:C)
Lula wrote:I don't bitch about W, I have a serious contempt for the man and his policies concerning our country and the world.
squirt1 wrote:I would just like to say that the Muslins believe this is payback for the Crusades and all of history. They have been attacking our interests since '79 when Iran took our hostages,and that goof ball Carter sat there. Reagan raises his hand to be sworn in, and they split the TV screen showing our hostages taking off. Must be something about those cowboys. Then there was the hit on the barricks in Lebanon, the guy in the wheelchair pushed off the ship and the partial hit on one of the Towers in '93. As far as I am concerned many terroroist leaders have been captured and many killed. It may only slow them down awhile,but I believe their monetary structure has been descimated and they are on the run or in a cave @ 10,000 ft in N Pakistan. Other countries are also getting hit and have started to fight back and share info. As far as WMD,what was in the convoy of 55 semi's that Russian special ops crossed into Syria with as we entered the south.It was shown on Fox news.The Israelis watched it get buried in Lebanon. Russia just loves to sell to ANYONE. Saddam harbored terrorists and paid $25,000 to the family of any killed. What was Abu Nidal doing in Iraq? Oops Saddam was having a bad hair day and shot him dead at point blank range. If you think Saddam wasn't trying everyway he could to get WMD with his arch enemy Iran building nukes, then you are not very aware. We will be at war for the rest of my life. Amen
conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:I don't bitch about W, I have a serious contempt for the man and his policies concerning our country and the world.
You have a contempt for the "man"? Did you have contempt for Clinton? If Bush is indeed contemptible as a person, if you're honest, I would hope you'd agree that Clinton is no better.
Lula wrote:I agreed with Clinton's policies a helluva lot more than I do W's. My opinion of W has nothing to do with my opinion of Clinton- W is running things, or at least appears to be. My contempt is with George W Bush, not Clinton.
conversationpc wrote:Lula wrote:conversationpc wrote:I agreed with Clinton's policies a helluva lot more than I do W's. My opinion of W has nothing to do with my opinion of Clinton- W is running things, or at least appears to be. My contempt is with George W Bush, not Clinton.
Just trying to see if you can be honest and say that Clinton wasn't all that skank-free himself. Even though I disagreed with the guy on most issues, the country still did okay under his watch. However, the guy is a contemptible individual.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests