Moderator: Andrew
A Fire Inside wrote:Dave, I think you're probably the most level-headed poster on this forum.
Val wrote:I still say a little moderation goes a long way. Pick someone you trust, someone that is here a lot. When anyone, Dean included comes in and starts crap, delete it right away. The less drama the more people that posts, unless the people really like the drama.
In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since.
Was I actually supposed to read all that?
Andrew wrote:Val wrote:I still say a little moderation goes a long way. Pick someone you trust, someone that is here a lot. When anyone, Dean included comes in and starts crap, delete it right away. The less drama the more people that posts, unless the people really like the drama.
Sorry, I do my best to moderrate, but I think involving anyone else (on this forum) would only make things even more complicated.
jrnyman28 wrote:[
Talk about sensitive. I am sorry you feel this way Carlitto. Again, like everyone else I have mentioned, I have nothing against you. But your posts have changed some IMO. Maybe not to the same extent. But they have. But the boundaries are getting pushed back further. And yet again, I only used you as an example...it was nothing personal.
fred_journeyman wrote:Sigh...okay, I'll try to explain what I meant...during the Dark Ages, the arts, including literature, song, music, manners, respect all of it pretty much went out the door. It was only because of a few monks and priests who collected AND guarded the literature that they could get their hands on, that the Dark Ages ended at all, thus opening the door for the Enlightenment. Did I mean that BT is enlightened? Of course not. What I meant was that here, people seem to enjoy wallowing in the sewer (Dark Ages), while over at BT, they do not (Enlightment). That's all I meant.
And, for the record, I'll say this one more time: if people want to swear and use foul language, that's up to them. What troubles me about it (and the ONLY thing that troubles me about it) is the FACT that as soon as that begins happening, quality debate gets thrown out the window as the threads are too often sidetracked while one person insults another person, who insults another person, etc.
Apparently, I'm now seen as:
1) A whiner
2) Against Free Speech
3) Hypocrite
4) Holier than thou
5) In need of getting laid
6) Having no sense of humor
7) Sicketc., etc.,
Dean, on the other hand is:
1) Funny
2) Irreverant
3) Funny
4) Possessing a great sense of humor
5) Highly intelligent
6) etc., etc., etc.
Now, those who have taken the time to get really PO'd about all of this have some explaining to themselves to do. Here I am - ONE PERSON - who is asking for people to acknowledge that there just MIGHT be a better way to communicate and I am verbally assaulted for it. Deano, on the other hand can come in here and wish AIDS on someone and he is essentially excused - "That's Deano." "Yeah, that was out of line, but DANG that Deano is funny!" etc., etc.
Andrew wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:
I used to come here and read every thread and every post. I have been active on this site for like 4 years now. I have been a part of the fighting and a part of the support. This place has changed. There is more activity but less content. I know only read a handful of threads. I still try to read all the posts within them so I know what is being said, but I end up skipping quite a few because there is nothing in them but verbal flatulence...
I kinda agree. But I do hope that like all things, it reverts back to better times. Every now and then there is a melt down, which is disappointing as this forum consumes so much of my time.
Perhaps it has out-lived it usefulness?
Andrew wrote:Val wrote:I still say a little moderation goes a long way. Pick someone you trust, someone that is here a lot. When anyone, Dean included comes in and starts crap, delete it right away. The less drama the more people that posts, unless the people really like the drama.
Sorry, I do my best to moderrate, but I think involving anyone else (on this forum) would only make things even more complicated.
Its Me wrote:Andrew wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:
I used to come here and read every thread and every post. I have been active on this site for like 4 years now. I have been a part of the fighting and a part of the support. This place has changed. There is more activity but less content. I know only read a handful of threads. I still try to read all the posts within them so I know what is being said, but I end up skipping quite a few because there is nothing in them but verbal flatulence...
I kinda agree. But I do hope that like all things, it reverts back to better times. Every now and then there is a melt down, which is disappointing as this forum consumes so much of my time.
Perhaps it has out-lived it usefulness?
Andrew, say it isn't so!! I finally found somewhere to talk with some friendly intelligent people.and you are a great moderator not to strict but strict enough to keep most posters in line..this meltdown will end when you post your review..everyone is on edge waiting for the news...even tho' we kinda know what to expect, we really don't know for sure..Granny (Carol)
Andrew...you dont mean shutting down the board...do you??? Please say NO!!!![]()
Or did I take that line wrong??????
Moose wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:I am saddened by what is going on here with Dean. The ones who wanted to have "polite discussions" better look at themselves. They post alot of not so nice shit here as well. And now all of you "nice polite discussion" people have angered me to no end now.As a result of what you have done, the rest of us on the board have to suffer.
If you don't like what Dean says, then skip his posts and don't reply, damnit ! It isn't that hard to do. YOU have the option to not even read or post a reply. Instead what you do is gripe, complain, whine, have a temper tantum, etc, to get your way.
And now two of whom I consider friends will not be sharing any more boots or information with us.Thanks a hell of a lot your shits........... I was so looking forward to what will be happening in the next few weeks. And hearing from AR and Dean was part of those weeks. And you crybaby fuckers ruined a good thing.............
Piss off and go to another board..........
[/b]
Gay
AR wrote:In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since.
Was I actually supposed to read all that?
Why not? it wasn't any more verbose than some of Fred's latest rants.
AR wrote:sorry AR i gave up after page 10
That wasn't really meant to be read. It was a metaphor for someone now departed.
Nothing to see here time to move on.
Red13JoePa wrote:JourneyRox wrote:ohsherrie wrote:but their frontmen weren't as well known or as closely associated with their signature sound as Steve Perry was to Journey. What I meant by household name was that anyone who listened to top 40 radio in the early to mid '80s knew that Steve Perry was the vocal force of Journey. Especially after Street Talk was released and the We Are The World Event.
Sorry Sherrie but lots of people don't know who Steve Perry is.Yeah I know. It's as much a shock to me as to u. I've had friends who were big fans of Foreigner & Styx, knew the lead singers, could name & sing several hit tunes, but altho they recognized the name "Journey" couldn't remember any songs. Then, when I sang Faithfully & Open Arms, they went oh yeah, I like them too. When I mentioned Steve Perry, they said who's he? The biggest shock of all was that they remembered Oh Sherrie as a Journey song & that was the song by "Journey" they remembered most. They were very shocked when I said that was a Steve Perry solo song. Oh well.
I've said exactly this before but loons doubt it. Even Monker the non-loon doubted it, but it's the ugly truth they don't wanna face whilst mocking Neal's throwaway comment about how it would be nice to be a household name once.
Truth is, SP god bless him he's an awesome frontman, was little more a household name than neal.
Clasicrockldy wrote:Moose wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:I am saddened by what is going on here with Dean. The ones who wanted to have "polite discussions" better look at themselves. They post alot of not so nice shit here as well. And now all of you "nice polite discussion" people have angered me to no end now.As a result of what you have done, the rest of us on the board have to suffer.
If you don't like what Dean says, then skip his posts and don't reply, damnit ! It isn't that hard to do. YOU have the option to not even read or post a reply. Instead what you do is gripe, complain, whine, have a temper tantum, etc, to get your way.
And now two of whom I consider friends will not be sharing any more boots or information with us.Thanks a hell of a lot your shits........... I was so looking forward to what will be happening in the next few weeks. And hearing from AR and Dean was part of those weeks. And you crybaby fuckers ruined a good thing.............
Piss off and go to another board..........
[/b]
Basically, the
Gay
What do you mean by that Moose?![]()
AR wrote:Hope you're happy, Fred, Monker, McNeil, Moose, Rich, etc because I talked with Dean tonight and he has no desire to post here now.
No more bootlegs for the rest of the board, no more information. And especially after next week with what is going to be going on, that will be a huge loss here. All just because there wasn't enough "polite discussion" aka same boring shit.
And before you say he will be back, I'm not so sure.
This forum's loss.
Whew! thats great because i took one look at that sucker and super scrolled to the bottom--i feel much better telling the truth now
Andrew wrote:Ok - here's the state of the nation.
Deano hates me. But you know what - ANYONE wishing aids upon other people is not going to be a friend of mine. Everyone is owed an apology for that comment.
This board will never be as santized as BT.
Fred wants me to ban him from the board to remove his temptation to post. Fine.
Deano's username is active again, but whether he choses to post is up to him - I'd like an apology to all first.
AR wrote:Here is a weird picture of a fat dude for absolutely no reason.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests