FyreWyngz wrote:As funny as that is you still haven't explained what the crisis is/was.
Fyre - I have explained what the crisis is. Journey are now an UNSIGNED BAND. Journey! One of the most famous and successful bands in the history of American music! A band who have sold 75 million albums! Without a record deal! Wake up man!
But just to avoid going round and round in circles on this point - let's just call it a 'rut'. You write eloquently and persistently about the urgent need for Journey to do something different so I'm assuming that you believe Journey's career has become stagnant and backward-looking...even if you think 'crisis' is too strong a word.
GENERATIONS was born of SA's desire to create a solo project. If he was/is the anvil chained around JOURNEY's neck as you like to suggest then WHY did they immediately jump on SA's ideas and use them to spark another JOURNEY album? JOURNEY must be the guy on Supertramp's cover, too!
Yes - they are EXACTLY like the guy on the Supertramp cover. For Schon and Cain to take their lead from an Augeri solo project reveals just how complacent and uninspired the band became - and as co-creators of the legendary Journey legacy Schon and Cain must ultimately take the responsibility for all the failures and indignities of the last eight years.
What is SA - some king of svengali that has Neal and everyone else under some kind of hypnotic trance <insert creepy Ed Wood B-movie music here>
We agree on this, Fyre....that theory is indeed as preposterous as any film by Ed Wood.
Why don't you explain exactly what this crisis is/was! If you can't then it seems to me that it's a figment of imagination and not a reality.
Why don't you read my replies to your bizarro comments? I've repeated myself so often on this point I'm surprised you haven't told me to 'change the record' instead.
my mind has been clear on the "decline" since they released E5C4P3 in 1981!
Just as Herbie Herbert warned and predicted: when you get a #1 it's all downhill from there!
HH was right - and that's why many acts quit at the top or know when to call it a day (Beatles, Led Zep, etc). Journey decided to press on regardless, to manage their decline and make the best of it. But at what point would you say ENOUGH? What would constitute a rock bottom in your view?
However JOURNEY can still get a #1 SINGLE but chances of that happening in the melodic rock genre or adult contemporary are slim.
Why not? Maybe, just maybe JSS has put them in with a chance. At the very least there are new opportunities to be explored....
The band just wasted away until 1996... SO - did JOURNEY "recover" with TBF? Nope. They were merely awakened.
This is like saying The Eagles "wasted away" in the 1980s and "recovered" in the 1990s. The fact is...the Eagles had their spectacularly successful era in the 1970s and QUIT AT THE TOP. And then they REFORMED after selling millions upon millions of back catalogue albums in between.
Same with Journey....
Then SA came along and helped breathe new life into a band
Journey lost 750,000 CD-buying fans and got dropped by their record label five years after being "awakened" by the TBF reunion. Behold the Augeri renaissance!
For 8 years JOURNEYhas been a successful touring machine despite the downhill slope of:
4. The nostalgic fan base.
Despite the nostalgic fan base? The only reason Journey are still making ANY income from touring is BECAUSE of the nostalgic fan base.
But I'm pleased to see that you've finally admitted that there has been a downhill slope over the last eight years.
While you're focusing in ONLY on the last 8 years I'm considering the ENTIRE PICTURE.
Let me clarify this, Fyre....yes, Journey's 'frontlist' career has been declining since 1981. I am not arguing that it was ONLY the arrival of Augeri which brought about the downturn.
My point is that the Augeri years saw Journey's career sink below an acceptable level of decline. TBF represented a decline too - but it was just successful enough for the band to retain their dignity and to maintain the status of the Journey name.
BUT considernig that Neal's regret has been that they didn't move on without SP after 1988 do you think he'd want to live to regret it AGAIN?
Can you IMAGINE the controversy if Schon had continued with Journey in 1988? The fact is Schon and Cain weren't confident enough about making this move then - and good thing too because they were given an opportunity to try and make it without Perry holding their hand.
Yes. It's because they didn't see the kind of $$$ that they saw with SP. That's entirely true but it doesn't take anything away from SA.
Why doesn't it take anything away from Augeri? The record company saw - rightly - that Augeri was an inferior singer and frontman who just didn't have what it takes to sustain the band's career as a serious recording act.
I didn't think you did, either. So SA was "wrong"?
No - Augeri was right to follow his dream...etc...etc....but Journey were "wrong" to hire him.
Bob Seger is Bob Seger. He's NOT a band with a largely divided fan base polarized between favorite singers.
And here you highlight another problem with the Augeri era. The majority of fans lost interest and Journey were left with dwindling bunch of squabbling die-hards.
Of course he can still "do it"!
Fyre - why do you think Journey aren't sticking by Augeri? You keep saying everyone has got it wrong about the recent developments in Augeri's career and his aibility to remain as the frontman? But the band seemingly disagree with you.
There isn't a single "nostalgic" band out there right now in their original lineup from their #1 days enjoying similar success.
No - but there are many acts who have retained a huge part of their audience and who are still signed to major record labels.
You're so locked into hanging everything on SA that you can't see it. Maybe YOU are the guy on the Supertramp cover...?
Actually, I'm hanging everything on Schon and Cain - including TapeGate.