yogi wrote:By playing a GREATEST hits tour over and over and over again.
By banking on another band that is bigger than you to keep you a float.
And if Perry came back, they wouldn't play their greatest hits?

Moderator: Andrew
NealIsGod wrote:yogi wrote:By playing a GREATEST hits tour over and over and over again.
By banking on another band that is bigger than you to keep you a float.
And if Perry came back, they wouldn't play their greatest hits?
KCfla wrote:NealIsGod wrote:yogi wrote:By playing a GREATEST hits tour over and over and over again.
By banking on another band that is bigger than you to keep you a float.
And if Perry came back, they wouldn't play their greatest hits?
Look- every band that has been around as long as Journey has, that has a back-catalog as loaded with hits as Journey has- is going to have their "dirty dozen" that they're expected to play every show. DL does as well, and they get bitched at constantly about the "Hysteria +" tour setlists.
Perry, Augeri, JSS- it won't matter. They have to play the hits! Because whether we like it or not- out of 10,000 fans at a show- maybe 150 ( I'll give you all 300 combined for the last tour!) are "die-hard's" like those that post on the band(s) and the various forums.
Sucks for us- but that's the truth!
scarabpilot wrote:
I hate to say it but some of his answers reminded me of the weird crap Michael Jackson would say in TV interviews. Its like he has to have this mystic around him. And the "Me likes" crap - please my 10 year old talks like that - you're old enough to be my dad, talk like it.
Man up Steve.
maverick218 wrote:conversationpc wrote:AR wrote:Just to be clear, my main beef .... And also with anyone who thinks that an almost 60 year old man could get up and front that band in 2006.
Exactly.
Just to play devil's advocate here: Mick Jagger and Roger Daltrey do it...
bluejeangirl76 wrote:maverick218 wrote:conversationpc wrote:AR wrote:Just to be clear, my main beef .... And also with anyone who thinks that an almost 60 year old man could get up and front that band in 2006.
Exactly.
Just to play devil's advocate here: Mick Jagger and Roger Daltrey do it...
Yes. And Roger Daltrey is 5 years older than Perry and when I saw him in Sept, he still rocked his AND our asses off.
Steven Tyler is also older than Perry. If he intended to get back on the stage, then there's no reason his age should be a factor.
And if you don't have a problem with Neal and Jon and Ross up there, then what's the big deal how old the singer is?
conversationpc wrote:
I don't begrudge the guy his right to be retired. I'm fine with that. I don't think he owes us anything or that he has to put out a new album or tour, or whatever. What I am not fine with are fans of the guy claiming that Journey is "ignoring" the fans while the guy they worship isn't doing much of anything besides talking occasionally.
AR said:
Just to be clear, my main beef isn't with Perry, or that he wishes to remain retired. It is with the fans who think that Journey has no right to exist without SP. And also with anyone who thinks that an almost 60 year old man could get up and front that band in 2006.
I like to go see Journey every summer and hear those songs in concert. Even if it is just the "dirty dozen" BTW, when did DOA, Edge of the Blade, Message of Love and Keep on Running make the so-called "dirty dozen"?
NealIsGod wrote:yogi wrote:By playing a GREATEST hits tour over and over and over again.
By banking on another band that is bigger than you to keep you a float.
And if Perry came back, they wouldn't play their greatest hits?
saint John wrote:NealIsGod wrote:yogi wrote:By playing a GREATEST hits tour over and over and over again.
By banking on another band that is bigger than you to keep you a float.
And if Perry came back, they wouldn't play their greatest hits?
Yes, but it won't be karaoke.
That is the first ive heard of Jon lipping . Are you talking shit ,and can you back it up.Im kinda new here, show me real evidence, or refer me to someone to back up that claim!! or shut the fuck up.yogi wrote:Journey died the minute the group and everyone in their inner circle led by Neal Schon decided to con their fans with tapegate. Steve Augeri WAS NOT the only band member lipping' 'Open My Eyes To A ........' As far as I know Jonathan lips errrrr I mean sings that part.
When Steve Perry quit Journey he asked Neal to NOT fracture the Journey name.
Allowing every band member plus roadies a lead on Generations regardless of vocal ability did just that.
Running a new lead singer out mid tour did just that.
Conning your ever faithful fans by memorixing parts of your show did just that.
P.S. GREAT post Eighty Rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
squirt1 wrote:Good post St John. And if Perry came back ,even for a show or 2 the crowds & media attention would generate huge receipts. They would not need an opening band or a DefLep who got paid handsomely leaving less for the opening act Journey.
NealIsGod wrote:squirt1 wrote:Good post St John. And if Perry came back ,even for a show or 2 the crowds & media attention would generate huge receipts. They would not need an opening band or a DefLep who got paid handsomely leaving less for the opening act Journey.
The above post is only an opinion and will never be proven. You can thank Perry for that. I do, because I will take JSS any day over Perry. No disrespect intended to Perry, but JSS can bring it. If you haven't seen the band live with JSS, then you can't appreciate it.
Shania wrote:BUT...suppose Perry would become an option,I can't understand how would you take JSS over Perry,NIG?Just curious.And no,don't tell me that Perry can't sing anymore,because you cannot possibly know that.Seriously.
I am asking you from another point of view:do you really think that the impact of a Perry-Schon-Cain-Valory-(and I dare to say)-Smitty line-up would be smaller than the present line-up's one?
BUT...suppose Perry would become an option
squirt1 wrote:Good post St John. And if Perry came back ,even for a show or 2 the crowds & media attention would generate huge receipts. They would not need an opening band or a DefLep who got paid handsomely leaving less for the opening act Journey.
hey I'm diggin' that kind of math!treetopovskaya wrote:60 is the new 40... so 58 must be the new 38. };C))
i love the heck outta jss but i would take sp over anyone. he might be pushing 60 but he still has spunk. }=C)
Lora wrote:fred_journeyman wrote:why enter the fray, when Journey doesn't even want to enter the fray? What happens in Journey is probably the last thing Perry concerns himself with.
Exactly. Good post, Fred.
ohsherrie wrote:I'm not implying that this isn't a valid topic because anything that anyone wants to talk about is valid, and this isn't meant as a response to anyone's post in this thread. I just really don't understand the point of this conversation.![]()
Steve is not actively involved in the performance of Journey music, but is a major part of the success of the catalog that they've been touring on for all these years and the continuing promotion of that catalog. That's why he did the UJB thing and the Q&A. That's all they were really about. I was hoping he would tell us he's working on new music, but that wasn't the case. He doesn't owe me that, I just want it, but I'm not going to stop loving what he has done or rag on him for what he does say just because he doesn't say exactly what I want him to. I enjoyed some of the personal insights that came through in some of the things he said.
He hasn't done anything controversial lately that relates to Journey, but the band has. He has nothing to answer for, but the band does. Why would we expect as much from him in that regard as we do from Journey? It seems that yet again some try to deflect the any criticizm of the current band by throwing it back at Perry when he's been out of the band for 10 years now.
I love what JSS can do for Journey now, and will always love Perry for what he did then and is still bringing to us through the remasters and such. No need for comparison or childish tit for tat BS. IMO
strungout wrote:ohsherrie wrote:I'm not implying that this isn't a valid topic because anything that anyone wants to talk about is valid, and this isn't meant as a response to anyone's post in this thread. I just really don't understand the point of this conversation.![]()
Steve is not actively involved in the performance of Journey music, but is a major part of the success of the catalog that they've been touring on for all these years and the continuing promotion of that catalog. That's why he did the UJB thing and the Q&A. That's all they were really about. I was hoping he would tell us he's working on new music, but that wasn't the case. He doesn't owe me that, I just want it, but I'm not going to stop loving what he has done or rag on him for what he does say just because he doesn't say exactly what I want him to. I enjoyed some of the personal insights that came through in some of the things he said.
He hasn't done anything controversial lately that relates to Journey, but the band has. He has nothing to answer for, but the band does. Why would we expect as much from him in that regard as we do from Journey? It seems that yet again some try to deflect the any criticizm of the current band by throwing it back at Perry when he's been out of the band for 10 years now.
I love what JSS can do for Journey now, and will always love Perry for what he did then and is still bringing to us through the remasters and such. No need for comparison or childish tit for tat BS. IMO
Great post! Long time no see.
SF-DANO wrote:...but the loons always seem to have to belittle/insult the rest of the band in the process of praising Perry. And should one comment be made that does not show Steve Perry as anything but saintly be made, the Perry Defense Force (PDF) is on you like flies on ...., well you know.
Lora wrote:fred_journeyman wrote:why enter the fray, when Journey doesn't even want to enter the fray? What happens in Journey is probably the last thing Perry concerns himself with.
Exactly. Good post, Fred.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests