Lora wrote:Jeremey wrote:in the end it will always be about the music. If they go with a guy who knows the songs inside and out, and has conditioned his voice by singing the material every weekend for 5 years for 3 hours at a time, to most I would think would be a good thing, but then again, there'll always be a fickle minority in any population.
For me, it is
not just about the music. It is about whether or not the singer/musician reaches me. Moves me. Makes me feel. When I listen to Steve Perry's voice, it literally alters my brain chemestry and takes me to that place. I can listen to someone else sing the very same song, the very same notes and.....nothing. Journey seems to want to play to people who don't know or care who is singing as long as they get close to the original sound. They will probably do just fine. But don't catagorize those who aren't going along for the ride as "fickle." I know my own heart and will follow it as you must follow yours.
I hear ya...hitting the notes is one thing but, then there's phrasing, delivery, the singer's connection with the audience, etc. that are the "intangibles" which are unique to each vocalist. Perry was unique in these intangibles. Perhaps it was just that he happened to be the singer at the time the songs became hits...who knows.
All I know is, SP's voice is the voice of the band. Always has been. The bigger issue here is protecting Journey's legacy. The band needs to realize that they are rather important in R&R history and that they shouldn't "water down" thier legacy by shuffling in too many singers / drummers, etc. They should call it a day and leave future R&R historians to judge the magnitude of their contributions to the genre.
Neal, JC, RV...start a new band. Turn a "new" page here.
It's the right thing to do.
