Matthew wrote:Come off it, Fyre. It's not like I exposed some secret shame. You brought up a personal and specific resentment towards Jonathan Cain - and I suggested that this had coloured your view of the guy's entire career. What's so "low" about that?
Because you've reduced a personal experience into something that it's not. Notice I said "experience" and NOT resentment. I don't resent JC for not responding. I simply posted my personal experience as support for the sociopath charges.
To turn that experience into a resentment couldn't be any further from the truth. It borders on denial. And I don't mean the river in Egypt.
Matthew wrote:Was this really his personal e-mail? Or was it a specially created fan account run by some poorly pais assistant or intern at Cain's office? After all - he is a senior member of one of the most successful American rock bands of all-time - so the guy is probably deluged with all kinds of crap.
It was his "personal" mail as his website claimed. He may be deluged with all kinds of crap however my mail should've been obvious to a mental giant as himself as being FROM A FAN.
Matthew wrote:Fyre - I'm not trying to rule out the possibility that Cain saw your name come up on the e-mail and thought, "Christ the last thing I need today is to listen to that guy bang on about Latin rythmns again". Yes, he might well have pressed 'delete'. But you don't KNOW this do you?
All I know is that he never responded to the few mails I sent him. He could've displayed some grace and responded with a form letter like the one I posted here. He apparently never troubled himself with my "crap". Maybe he feels above it all.
I've written to The White House when Clinton was in office (which I'm sure receives LOTS more crap than JC) and they responded with a form letter signed by Clinton that addressed the specific of my mail. If Clinton and his assistants could refrain from having oral sex long enough to read and respond to my mail then I can't imagine why JC couldn't.
Matthew wrote:Consider this Fyre. If Cain HAD returned your e-mail would be be on this forum trashing his contributions to Journey and calling him a "pyschopath"?
1. I live by simple philosophies. I say what I mean and I mean what I say. I may not be right and I may not be wrong but I live simply to sing my song (I don't know who said that - I may have I just made it up but I mean it!).
2. I'm not trashing contributions. I'm giving credit where it's due. You perceive this as trashing because you're giving more credit than is due.
3. I haven't called anyone a psychopath. That was the term you inferred. I was providing arguments/personal experiences to support the charge of sociopath.
Matthew wrote:Am I the only person here who think's there was something special about the Perry, Schon,Cain trio? Surely not....
I'm not at all arguing that it wasn't special. It was incredible. So was Perry, Schon, Rolie. All of the above have had solo efforts and other team projects. Out of all of the above Perry had the greatest success in those endeavors so it's self-evident that he deserves the credit for being the "X-Factor". I'm not taking credit away from anyone else with that statement.
Matthew wrote:And after you've flounced around in protest you'll adapt and support the next guy too.
Maybe. We'll see.
Matthew wrote:You were hardly leader of the welcome party for JSS last year were you?
I made some challenges. On BT I challenged HOW SA was "released". On MR I challenged HOW SA was trounced (much like how you're defending JC). I wasn't a welcome party leader because there was enough of those. It was more my voice to express dissent about the travesties taking place.
Matthew wrote:Yet now look at you. All you hopes and dreams are invested in the guy and you think that that firing him is a crime worthy of a maximum security jail sentence.....
Maximum would be too good. He needs to have a big, hairy cellmate named Bubba.