Moderator: Andrew
STORY_TELLER wrote:The instrumentals lack focus. The guitar work is all over the place and feels outside of the melody of the song.
Red13JoePa wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:The instrumentals lack focus. The guitar work is all over the place and feels outside of the melody of the song.
Upon listening once I agree.
I'm feeling like his leads at times (and a damn lot of the time live) are all soloistic.
Like he's playing his solo from the 2001 dvd in the Journey songs.
Eric wrote:Lora wrote: Yawn. That is my reaction to this song. Recycled and nothing interesting except Neal's guitar. If you love it, great. But I don't love it. I am a longtime Journey fan and not a fucking moron, so there goes your theory.
I like that you gave a chance...Am I wrong that you still HOPE for another song by J that you will love?
jrnyman28 wrote:Maybe this is Journey's version of 5150. Van halen stated they went for a very commercial sound to ease the transition from DLR to Sammy. They wanted it to be as listenable as possible to overcome the hurdle of switching lead singers. Now I am not comparing quality of the two, just the idea. Maybe Journey specifically wanted to sound as much like that era of the band too grease the way for accepting Arnel. And maybe it is most present on this song, which is why they picked it for lead single?
conversationpc wrote:I don't really know what sound it had but it could've been mixed/mastered much better than it was. It doesn't really sound much better than either "Generations" or "Red 13" to my ears.
jrnyman28 wrote:Maybe this is Journey's version of 5150. Van halen stated they went for a very commercial sound to ease the transition from DLR to Sammy. They wanted it to be as listenable as possible to overcome the hurdle of switching lead singers. Now I am not comparing quality of the two, just the idea. Maybe Journey specifically wanted to sound as much like that era of the band too grease the way for accepting Arnel. And maybe it is most present on this song, which is why they picked it for lead single?
Lora wrote:Yawn. That is my reaction to this song. Recycled and nothing interesting except Neal's guitar. If you love it, great. But I don't love it. I am a longtime Journey fan and not a fucking moron, so there goes your theory.
jrnyman28 wrote:conversationpc wrote:I don't really know what sound it had but it could've been mixed/mastered much better than it was. It doesn't really sound much better than either "Generations" or "Red 13" to my ears.
I am listening on crappy standard work computer speakers so I can't even begin to comment on the production/mix. But I know I can easily hear the vocals. Something that seemed difficult with the Augeri-era.
Funny thing is nowadays I don't hear anything wrong with the mix on Red13. I remember it being jarring when I first listened but now I am accustomed to it and it works fine for me.
conversationpc wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:conversationpc wrote:I don't really know what sound it had but it could've been mixed/mastered much better than it was. It doesn't really sound much better than either "Generations" or "Red 13" to my ears.
I am listening on crappy standard work computer speakers so I can't even begin to comment on the production/mix. But I know I can easily hear the vocals. Something that seemed difficult with the Augeri-era.
Funny thing is nowadays I don't hear anything wrong with the mix on Red13. I remember it being jarring when I first listened but now I am accustomed to it and it works fine for me.
The production I was talking about in that quote was for FTLOSM.
Barb wrote:I'm making an MP3 and will upload shortly!
jrnyman28 wrote:But I know I can easily hear the vocals. Something that seemed difficult with the Augeri-era.
The Sushi Hunter wrote:Very glad that classic rock is back. Reminds me of the 80's and the music I listened to. Yeah, definitely a 5150 resemblance, but never the less, love Arnel's voice, the chores and the guitar track. I'm definetely in line for the album release. Fuck....now all I need to do if find a Walmart nearest me and get mapquest to help me get there.
jrnyman28 wrote:Maybe this is Journey's version of 5150. Van halen stated they went for a very commercial sound to ease the transition from DLR to Sammy. They wanted it to be as listenable as possible to overcome the hurdle of switching lead singers. Now I am not comparing quality of the two, just the idea. Maybe Journey specifically wanted to sound as much like that era of the band too grease the way for accepting Arnel. And maybe it is most present on this song, which is why they picked it for lead single?
jrnyman28 wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:STORY_TELLER wrote:The instrumentals lack focus. The guitar work is all over the place and feels outside of the melody of the song.
Upon listening once I agree.
I'm feeling like his leads at times (and a damn lot of the time live) are all soloistic.
Like he's playing his solo from the 2001 dvd in the Journey songs.
I agree that Neal has been a little stuck in the "listen to me" playing instead of playing what the song demands...
jrnyjetster wrote:They tried that already with ARRIVAL, Dave. We all know how that went, when they didn't get any support from Sony. I have a feeling REVELATION will be much different however and Journey could be on the charts again, if they play their cards right.
Enigma869 wrote:The ballad I heard (Don't recall the name of it) from Vegas sounded SUPERB and loaded with commercial potential!
John from Boston
jrnyman28 wrote:a "comeback".
froy wrote:
WO Oh Be Good To Yourself....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests