wednesday's child wrote:Enigma869 wrote:wednesday's child wrote:Andrew,
Sorry, but I don't think it makes sense to me.
That's a double standard for silliness.
Silly homosexual innuendo against individual Journey members is okay,
but just-as-silly appreciation for the same folks is verboten?
(Unless it's coming from the Loons, LOL..)
For what it's worth, I don't think Drew has ever forbidden "appreciation threads".
The words of Andrew's opening post on this thread notwithstanding,
he HAS actually locked at least one down, on principle of BEING so appreciative:
Ross Valory Appreciation Threadand if a site-owner's action isn't indicative of policy, then hey *shrug*. There was nothing stopping
negative comment on Ross' playing/humor/skincare from surfacing there, or in its own threads.
He has locked another thread down, apparently on principle of being as-syrupy silly:
Fun Forum Game,
which I, from a personal standpoint, supported because I thought it was trivial, unrelated to Journey,
and a potential bandwidth hog, (the board is not unfamiliar with bandwidth issues, no?) although I must admit,
the interlude soon had me wondering where that would leave the venerable "Single Word Thread", or
"The 2008 MR Forum Member Photo Gallery", and a host of other such non-Journey-related silliness.
The sense of community here would suffer if all silliness was to be discouraged.
Andrew wrote:wednesday's child wrote:Silly homosexual innuendo against individual Journey members is okay,
Actually it's not. I have asked those comments to stop and I trust they will.
Well, that's a bit of a dodge, Andrew.
"Those comments" seem to have been able to prosper here for quite some time.
These appreciation threads however, seem to have earned intervention far more quickly.
As you claimed at the start of this thread, MR is
"a place where folks could say how they
really felt about this band and other topics, without fear of being closed down because
you weren't a cheerleader for the band."Organizing forum members to buy quantities of Revelation in excess of personal need,
just to attain gold/platinum status for the album --now THAT is cheerleading, and I don't
think that sort of fluff has ever prospered here, nor ever can.
The board has indeed been shifting towards a positive sentiment towards Journey.
That isn't a problem, because the critical members of the forum seem just as critical
as before --they just see a decent album, a rechargedband, and are
appreciative of it.
Is your Revelation review to be dismissed just because it was positive?
Because appreciated the content?
We've expressed negative criticism in both serious and silly manner, and while the latter
can lead to misinterpretation, this place wouldn't have the sense of community it enjoys
without some silliness.
Why can't that same silliness attend the expression of positive criticism? of appreciation?
You can trust your board's members to hammer any real cheerleaders into a more critical
mode of appreciation.
Your board's quality and identity goes beyond being a mere antithesis of some other,
and I think it doesn't need to keep referencing some sad baseline to define itself.
Its qualities speak for itself. Be proud of it, and don't think so little of its durability.
Hey, you asked for comment.
I'm done.
-wech.