The_Noble_Cause wrote:artist4perry wrote:nope. Maybe he had good reason. Out of curiosity where is your sources? All I am saying, is sometimes it depends on who the story teller is, and their agenda. I am not refering to you, just the source.
The news.
I'm tired of being this forum's surrogate Googler.
This story was everywhere and then some.
http://www.military.com/news/article/ve ... -bill.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/e ... bama_N.htm
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar ... fends.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/26/mccain/
His opposition makes sense according to this bit from the USA Today link you provided...
McCain opposes the measure, as does the Pentagon, out of concern that providing such a benefit after only three years of service would encourage people to leave the military after completing only one enlistment even as the U.S. fights two wars and is trying to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps.
Instead, McCain and Republican colleagues proposed a bill to increase benefits in conjunction with a veteran's length of service. Senate Democrats blocked the measure last week.
"Most worrying to me is that by hurting retention, we will reduce the numbers of men and women who we train to become the backbone of all the services, the noncommissioned officer," McCain said in his statement.