Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Do,you think that our right to freedom of speech has been eroded in the past several years?

Yes, it has.
26
62%
No, it hasn't
16
38%
 
Total votes : 42

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:07 am

Purrkat wrote: Sorry I stopped in for coffee............


So am I. Now, get the fuck out and take your ugly cat with you :shock: :shock: :shock:


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Rhiannon » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:07 am

Purrkat wrote:What good ol days? There is such a thing? :shock:


Why did you join if this place angers you so? If there were no "good days" for you... then whyyyy dear God post all the time?

TIme out. Let's have chocolate.


Let's not.

I am NOT stirring the pot. I am VOICING opinions. Isn't this what the thread was about. FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
I told you all I am opinionated. I am also patiotic as all get out. Sorry, you all forgot what it is like to be a true American.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh! So because we don't all understand where the hell you're coming from in your random irate rants about how Perry is infringing upon your liberties, then we're automatically classified as un-American? You ARE stirring the pot, if you didn't think you were, you wouldn't go back and edit your posts like you do. Like Cyndy said, did he punch your kitten or something?
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Uno_up » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:09 am

Purrkat wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry for being so "cranky" but trying to have fun on these message boards anymore is like drilling for oil by hand.


You've been participating here for 6 days! What the fuck? Sorry you miss the "good ol' days" of last Friday... :lol:


What good ol days? There is such a thing? :shock:

TIme out. Let's have chocolate.
I am NOT stirring the pot. I am VOICING opinions. Isn't this what the thread was about. FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
I told you all I am opinionated. I am also patiotic as all get out. Sorry, you all forgot what it is like to be a true American.

I am also sick to death of everybody making someone else out to be this golden idol who can do no wrong and is so perfect.
Give me a break. People can be talanted as heck and still be jerks. Nothing wrong with that. Don't they call it "creative energy".

Let's talk about Cain. He doesn't seem to draw so much gunfire.

Th


I don't give a Cain's ass about what you type. You really should think about what you say before you hit the "submit" button...and be sure that the idea you're trying to convey won't be misconstrued by others.
I look at the "Modes of Transportation" thread and noticed that on page one, you edited yourself a total of SEVEN times!...Obviously you have freedom of speech AND freedom of modifying everything you say. That's one confusing thread if you're just jumping in for the first time.
Uno_up
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1026
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:44 pm
Location: north of you

Postby annpea » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:13 am

strangegrey wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:People are too damn sensitive anymore. Fly off the handle at one little comment... or take what other people say too serious or literal.
Not to mention all the PC bullshit. :roll:


I think that's more the case.

While I don't think, in civil terms, we've lost our freedom to speech...what has happened, is that sensitivity has bubbled to rediculous levels, which has created a dreadfully low threshold for discussions that may be offensive or offputting to a minority.


Back 20 years ago, you could say anything and very little could be labeled as 'not apropriate to say.' These days, that list is so much larger, that people are forced to watch what they say in all walks....

My father was 100% right about PC. He labelled it a type of speech-control. It's a subtractive way to limit the freedom of speech, without actually lowering the threshold at the civil level.
I agree totally with his opinion, he is so on the money with that.
Dancing between the raindrops.
User avatar
annpea
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:20 am
Location: Somewhere along the Dixie Highway

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:13 am

Seems as though freedom of speech is working just fine in this thread!! :shock:
Looks as though I have some catching up to do!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Jana » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:18 am

better hurry up, Michigan Girl. Last night purrkat's last thread was deleted for some odd reason. :wink:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:19 am

Purrkat wrote:I have done nothing wrong but ask questions and make opinions. What the heck is wrong with that? Like YOU don't? :roll:

And I thought PV was full of crazies. Geez. Sorry I stopped in for coffee............


Time for Andrew to trace IPs. THAT sounds very very familiar.
And conveniently, someone else has been absent.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby annpea » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:22 am

Purrkatt! what the fuck is wrong with you? if SP pissed on your cupcake take that up with him and see how far you get.
Last edited by annpea on Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dancing between the raindrops.
User avatar
annpea
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:20 am
Location: Somewhere along the Dixie Highway

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:38 am

Uno_up wrote:
Purrkat wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry for being so "cranky" but trying to have fun on these message boards anymore is like drilling for oil by hand.


You've been participating here for 6 days! What the fuck? Sorry you miss the "good ol' days" of last Friday... :lol:


What good ol days? There is such a thing? :shock:

TIme out. Let's have chocolate.
I am NOT stirring the pot. I am VOICING opinions. Isn't this what the thread was about. FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
I told you all I am opinionated. I am also patiotic as all get out. Sorry, you all forgot what it is like to be a true American.

I am also sick to death of everybody making someone else out to be this golden idol who can do no wrong and is so perfect.
Give me a break. People can be talanted as heck and still be jerks. Nothing wrong with that. Don't they call it "creative energy".

Let's talk about Cain. He doesn't seem to draw so much gunfire.

Th


I don't give a Cain's ass about what you type. You really should think about what you say before you hit the "submit" button...and be sure that the idea you're trying to convey won't be misconstrued by others.
I look at the "Modes of Transportation" thread and noticed that on page one, you edited yourself a total of SEVEN times!...Obviously you have freedom of speech AND freedom of modifying everything you say. That's one confusing thread if you're just jumping in for the first time.

LMAO!!
Eight~ if you include the title.....I didn't know what you were talking about "Modes of Transporation"?
That wasn't the title of that thread yesterday!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:01 am

Two pages and no one has been accused of being Susie yet? :lol:
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:09 am

Gunbot wrote:Two pages and no one has been accused of being Susie yet? :lol:


Nope. This sounds like something else entirely.
Very familiar.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:22 am

Image
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby conversationpc » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:25 am

strangegrey wrote:Back 20 years ago, you could say anything and very little could be labeled as 'not apropriate to say.' These days, that list is so much larger, that people are forced to watch what they say in all walks....

My father was 100% right about PC. He labelled it a type of speech-control. It's a subtractive way to limit the freedom of speech, without actually lowering the threshold at the civil level.


I support 100% people be allowed to speak their mind. However, there certainly are occasions where a person should probably restrict themselves. They have the RIGHT to sy it but that doesn't mean they SHOULD. Case in point, the quote in my sig.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:59 am

conversationpc wrote:I support 100% people be allowed to speak their mind. However, there certainly are occasions where a person should probably restrict themselves. They have the RIGHT to sy it but that doesn't mean they SHOULD. Case in point, the quote in my sig.


You're right Cpc. I have the RIGHT to run through the projects at 11 pm screaming racial slurs at the top of my lungs. Doesn't mean I SHOULD. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby strangegrey » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:04 am

conversationpc wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Back 20 years ago, you could say anything and very little could be labeled as 'not apropriate to say.' These days, that list is so much larger, that people are forced to watch what they say in all walks....

My father was 100% right about PC. He labelled it a type of speech-control. It's a subtractive way to limit the freedom of speech, without actually lowering the threshold at the civil level.


I support 100% people be allowed to speak their mind. However, there certainly are occasions where a person should probably restrict themselves. They have the RIGHT to sy it but that doesn't mean they SHOULD. Case in point, the quote in my sig.


Good points...however the point I was making is that by establishing some unspoken policy re:PC, you mandate a certain speach.

I like to say "Freedom of Speech isnt free. You pay for every little thing you say" That allows people to self govern how they speak. By establishing some 'decency bar' set by some political or social group....your undercutting the ability for speech to work itself out on its own....
Image
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby skinsguy » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:07 am

conversationpc wrote:
strangegrey wrote:Back 20 years ago, you could say anything and very little could be labeled as 'not apropriate to say.' These days, that list is so much larger, that people are forced to watch what they say in all walks....

My father was 100% right about PC. He labelled it a type of speech-control. It's a subtractive way to limit the freedom of speech, without actually lowering the threshold at the civil level.


I support 100% people be allowed to speak their mind. However, there certainly are occasions where a person should probably restrict themselves. They have the RIGHT to sy it but that doesn't mean they SHOULD. Case in point, the quote in my sig.


Agreed 100%! Some people don't know how to use their freedoms wisely.
User avatar
skinsguy
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:46 am

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:07 am

strangegrey wrote:I like to say "Freedom of Speech isnt free. You pay for every little thing you say"


Wow. True.

U r thmart.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby Rhiannon » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:09 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Two pages and no one has been accused of being Susie yet? :lol:


Nope. This sounds like something else entirely.
Very familiar.


OMG. Yep. :shock:
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:17 am

Could you imagine a show like "All in the Family" or "The Jefferson's" on in this day and age. People back then knew it was art imitating life. Everybody knew an Archie type in the circle of family or friends. It didn't make it right but there was no harm in laughing at Archie's slanted view of the world. Those shows taught tolerance, not so much by focusing on the main characters but the action and dialogue of the supporting cast.

Now day's a show like that would be boycotted and have it's sponsors pulled. Freedom of speech is boxed into a package now that you aren't supposed to break the boundary of, less you offend the authors of the Politically correct content that is stuffed in the box.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby skinsguy » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:22 am

I'm still trying to figure out how "black hole" is a racist term.
User avatar
skinsguy
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:46 am

Postby Enigma869 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:36 am

Gunbot wrote: Could you imagine a show like "All in the Family" on in this day and age.


A show like "All In The Family" would NEVER EVER EVER get close to being aired today. That show broke EVERY rule it could think of and even a few it couldn't think of!


Gunbot wrote:People back then knew it was art imitating life.


Perhaps, eventually. It didn't start out that way. The truth is that before EVERY episode of "All In The Family", during its first season, there was a warning before the show started (and it actually had "WARNING" in big letters) that basically told people "Listen, this show is probably going to piss you off, and offend 90% of the population". It was the most brilliantly written show, and the best cast ever assembled on tv. It's unfortunate that we'll never see anything like it again.

http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/TV/9810/15/a ... index.html


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:41 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Gunbot wrote: Could you imagine a show like "All in the Family" on in this day and age.


A show like "All In The Family" would NEVER EVER EVER get close to being aired today. That show broke EVERY rule it could think of and even a few it couldn't think of!


Gunbot wrote:People back then knew it was art imitating life.


Perhaps, eventually. It didn't start out that way. The truth is that before EVERY episode of "All In The Family", during its first season, there was a warning before the show started (and it actually had "WARNING" in big letters) that basically told people "Listen, this show is probably going to piss you off, and offend 90% of the population". It was the most brilliantly written show, and the best cast ever assembled on tv. It's unfortunate that we'll never see anything like it again.

http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/TV/9810/15/a ... index.html




John from Boston


It went down hill when they brought the kid into the storyline as political correctness reared it's head OR maybe Norman Lear just ran out of Ideas. I don't remember the warning disclaimer but then again I was only about 10 years old when it aired.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby G.I.Jim » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:17 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:42 am

G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby G.I.Jim » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:46 am

Gunbot wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:


I guess so! :shock: :lol:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:49 am

Gunbot wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:


I think he's inferring that Sherrie had a penis.

(play with THAT image for awhile boys) :lol:
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby Don » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:52 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:


I think he's inferring that Sherrie had a penis.


(play with THAT image for awhile boys) :lol:


Is that what became of those royalty checks?
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby Rhiannon » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:54 am

Gunbot wrote:Is that what became of those royalty checks?


Antibiotics and steroids add up.
Rhiannon
MP3
 
Posts: 10829
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 9:09 am

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby Since 78 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:56 am

Gunbot wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:


I think he's inferring that Sherrie had a penis.


(play with THAT image for awhile boys) :lol:


Is that what became of those royalty checks?


Thanks! You guys have totally ruined the Oh Sherrie video! :(
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Re: Poll: Freedom of speech and thought.

Postby G.I.Jim » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:57 am

Since 78 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
G.I.Jim wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
cyndy! wrote:
Purrkat wrote:Sorry, but nobody takes away our freedom of speech. Nobody. Hear that SP?


did SP punch your cat & tell you to shut up at some point in your life to cause such bitterness?


"Hear that SP?" Dude... what? Now SP is at fault for loss of freedom of speech, too? :roll:

That has to be one if the dumbest things I've read here in awhile. Did she seriously just blame Perry because she got told something here that she didn't like?




Why all the SP hate? Just because he's an eccentric, cat-punching, closet homosexual (you might have a chance after all Bobby) who has more fans than he can count yet hasn't sang anything or toured in over a decade...what's wrong with that? Give the guy a break will ya! :wink: :lol: :shock:


Are you saying his experience with Sherrie turned him off women? :lol:


I think he's inferring that Sherrie had a penis.


(play with THAT image for awhile boys) :lol:


Is that what became of those royalty checks?


Thanks! You guys have totally ruined the Oh Sherrie video! :(


Think about THIS song....Oh Larry! :wink:
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 63 guests