Behshad wrote:Saint John wrote: Sorry, Tito, but that's fuckin' funny.
Tito knows Im just messing with him. Right Tito?
Can anyone guess Tito's favorite position ??
I'm laughing.
Moderator: Andrew
Behshad wrote:BJG, I hate to agree with Dan on this one, but he does have a valid point.![]()
Betcha most guys here would f**k a bitch any given day than f**k another dude.
Tito wrote:Behshad wrote:Saint John wrote: Sorry, Tito, but that's fuckin' funny.
Tito knows Im just messing with him. Right Tito?
Can anyone guess Tito's favorite position ??
I'm laughing.
StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
Saint John wrote:Several things. There's no logical argument? And condoning a behavior that would end mankind is?bluejeangirl76 wrote:You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
Unless 2 dudes can have kids or you bumping clits with another woman can suddenly produce a child I would say that it's you that doesn't have a logical argument. And for the record, I find a man butt-fucking another man more disturbing than a man fucking a female dog. Both are absolutely disgusting, though. One just slightly less than the other.
Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
It's NOT legal therePeople just do it and get away with it. There is a difference
Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
It's NOT legal therePeople just do it and get away with it. There is a difference
We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy"
StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
It's NOT legal therePeople just do it and get away with it. There is a difference
We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy"
In a vote on a ballot that would make it legal![]()
![]()
artist4perry wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Polls open in a half an hour here. Once I drop my daughter off at school, I am going to vote.![]()
Dr. Who fan?
Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:conversationpc wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Saint John wrote:Sarah wrote:Thank you.
Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.
My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.
You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god.Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.
I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.
I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
It's NOT legal therePeople just do it and get away with it. There is a difference
We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy"
In a vote on a ballot that would make it legal![]()
![]()
Oh really? Well thanks for educationg us mortals on that issue!![]()
You totally missed my point, cause youre drunk, not high!!!
RossValoryRocks wrote:Tito wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Tito wrote:can you at least vote FOR Proposition 8 for your good friend Tito. It will make me happy and I make it worth your time. Thank you.
You don't even live in California, what are you worried about prop 8 for.
Its already legal there anyway. Face it... that's a lost battle.
Ladies, do ME a favor and vote the way YOU want, not because some homophobe halfway across the country tells you what to choose. Thank you.
Fuck you. It's only legal (hopefully temporarily) because of a judge(s). It is not a lost battle. It has never passed when it's been on the ballot.
Look man, I am as conservative as it gets on most issues, but not letting people live their lives and love who they want to, and pass on their weath and visit their loved ones in a hospital is just wrong.
The homosexuals in this country should have every right we do, irrespective of their sexual preference.
Why does it matter to you how people live thier lives?? If they are morally wrong it is not for you to judge, but for God.
StevePerryHair wrote: I'm not drunk.....yetAnd you missed my point, I got yours. You were making a joke, I realize that
Now go hook dan up with some good girl porn
![]()
![]()
Maybe that will soften him a little on the gay issues
![]()
Clasicrockldy wrote:artist4perry wrote:Clasicrockldy wrote:Polls open in a half an hour here. Once I drop my daughter off at school, I am going to vote.![]()
Dr. Who fan?
Yep! Are you???![]()
No, moron. I'm referring to acknowledging and granting rights to perverse behavior. Let gays do what they want in private. It's just that it's not a natural union and shouldn't be acknowledged. I want to marry my G.I. Joe army toy. Is that okay too?UncleKG wrote:Legalizing gay marriage will end mankind?...ummmmm....because if it becomes legal, EVERYONE will suddenly turn gay? Hmmmm....that's completely logical.
I never said that. The fact that the capacity, by some complex design, doesn't exist leads me to believe that it's not meant to happen. Again, people can ram each others shit tunnels til the cows come home, but I don't think states should recognize it.UncleKG wrote:Marriage is only for people to procreate (that is what you intimated in your argument above)? So, by your logic, if a male-female couple either can't or choose not to have a kid, then their marriage shouldn't be recognized either?
I care enough to argue about it and nothing more. Again, if 2 women want to strap on plastic clubs and role play, fine.UncleKG wrote:WHO CARES IF GAY PEOPLE MARRY, and if you do care, WHY? Being that keeping gay marriage illegal is in no way going to decrease the number of gay people in the world, I think the wiser move is to teach your children how YOU feel about homosexuality and then hope they don't find a person of the same sex attractive. That's about the best you can do.
One of the government's job is to discriminate who is and isn't capable of logical thought. Just like we aid severely mentally disabled people with their choices we must also aid homosexuals with their skewed logic.UncleKG wrote:I'm always amused how conservatives say, "Keep government out of my business," but when it comes to someone else's business, THAT's a whole different story.
There are tons of people dying to adopt.UncleKG wrote:I also ask this question of everyone who's Pro-Life, but who are also against Welfare and other social programs. Pray tell, if abortion is illegal, who do you think is going to end up picking up the tab for all those children? If you don't want to allow women to not have children they either don't want or are not equipped to raise, then I assume you're willing to take those kids in and rear them yourselves, right? If not, then you're OK with tens of thousands of homeless and unwanted street urchins, who will then likely become thieves and maladjusted criminals, stealing to survive, right? But, if they break into your house to steal some food, it should be OK for you to shoot them, right? So, you want them to live and grow up to a ripe enough age where you can eliminate them yourself? OK, I get it now.
Deb wrote:StevePerryHair wrote: I'm not drunk.....yetAnd you missed my point, I got yours. You were making a joke, I realize that
Now go hook dan up with some good girl porn
![]()
![]()
Maybe that will soften him a little on the gay issues
![]()
Are you sure soften is the right word?![]()
UncleKG wrote:I don't understand why anyone cares if two people want to get married. If they want to bring the government into their relationship, hey, more power to them. They have just as much right to be miserable and get half their stuff taken away in a divorce as the next person.
You act like gay people do it on their front lawn and force you to rent a lawn chair and watch it....and I say this as a heterosexual male.
UncleKG wrote:Marriage is only for people to procreate (that is what you intimated in your argument above)? So, by your logic, if a male-female couple either can't or choose not to have a kid, then their marriage shouldn't be recognized either?
UncleKG wrote:I'm always amused how conservatives say, "Keep government out of my business," but when it comes to someone else's business, THAT's a whole different story.
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
That sounds a little gay![]()
Tito wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
That sounds a little gay![]()
I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tito wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
That sounds a little gay![]()
I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
That sounds a little gay![]()
I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Was that an internet proposition? Cause then prog can go and answer that poll from last week
Behshad wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:StevePerryHair wrote:Tito wrote:ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....
My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)
....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
I love you too.
That sounds a little gay![]()
I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Was that an internet proposition? Cause then prog can go and answer that poll from last week
Um,, I think Tito was talking about YOU and HIM getting married !!!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests