OT: Did you vote and who did you vote for?

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

For whom did you vote for President?

John McCain
49
44%
Barack Obama
51
46%
Bob Barr
3
3%
Other
2
2%
I didn't vote
7
6%
 
Total votes : 112

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:21 am

Behshad wrote:
Saint John wrote: Sorry, Tito, but that's fuckin' funny. :lol:


Tito knows Im just messing with him. Right Tito?

Can anyone guess Tito's favorite position ?? :shock:


I'm laughing.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:22 am

Behshad wrote:BJG, I hate to agree with Dan on this one, but he does have a valid point. 8)
Betcha most guys here would f**k a bitch any given day than f**k another dude. :shock:


Yeah but that was just a serious STRETCH of an example - no one was talking about screwing animals until he threw that in there. We're talking about humans and their rights to be with with ever other humans they want and god damn if the gay bashers don't always go right for the "screwing an animal" comparison. :roll:
Last edited by bluejeangirl76 on Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:23 am

Tito wrote:
Behshad wrote:
Saint John wrote: Sorry, Tito, but that's fuckin' funny. :lol:


Tito knows Im just messing with him. Right Tito?

Can anyone guess Tito's favorite position ?? :shock:


I'm laughing.


On the inside? :P :lol: :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Behshad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:23 am

StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby UncleKG » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:24 am

Saint John wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.
Several things. There's no logical argument? And condoning a behavior that would end mankind is? :? Unless 2 dudes can have kids or you bumping clits with another woman can suddenly produce a child I would say that it's you that doesn't have a logical argument. And for the record, I find a man butt-fucking another man more disturbing than a man fucking a female dog. Both are absolutely disgusting, though. One just slightly less than the other.


Legalizing gay marriage will end mankind?...ummmmm....because if it becomes legal, EVERYONE will suddenly turn gay? Hmmmm....that's completely logical.

I don't understand why anyone cares if two people want to get married. If they want to bring the government into their relationship, hey, more power to them. They have just as much right to be miserable and get half their stuff taken away in a divorce as the next person.

You act like gay people do it on their front lawn and force you to rent a lawn chair and watch it....and I say this as a heterosexual male.

Marriage is only for people to procreate (that is what you intimated in your argument above)? So, by your logic, if a male-female couple either can't or choose not to have a kid, then their marriage shouldn't be recognized either?

I personally applaud any couple who doesn't have a child. There are too many people in the world as it is. The next time you are able to find a good parking space, you need to buy a childless couple (or a gay couple) a friggin' drink! (thank you, Doug Stanhope). They're part of the SOLUTION to overpopulation.

WHO CARES IF GAY PEOPLE MARRY, and if you do care, WHY? Being that keeping gay marriage illegal is in no way going to decrease the number of gay people in the world, I think the wiser move is to teach your children how YOU feel about homosexuality and then hope they don't find a person of the same sex attractive. That's about the best you can do.

I'm always amused how conservatives say, "Keep government out of my business," but when it comes to someone else's business, THAT's a whole different story.

I also ask this question of everyone who's Pro-Life, but who are also against Welfare and other social programs. Pray tell, if abortion is illegal, who do you think is going to end up picking up the tab for all those children? If you don't want to allow women to not have children they either don't want or are not equipped to raise, then I assume you're willing to take those kids in and rear them yourselves, right? If not, then you're OK with tens of thousands of homeless and unwanted street urchins, who will then likely become thieves and maladjusted criminals, stealing to survive, right? But, if they break into your house to steal some food, it should be OK for you to shoot them, right? So, you want them to live and grow up to a ripe enough age where you can eliminate them yourself? OK, I get it now.

Read "Freakonomics" sometime, where the author suggests the very plausible explanation that the reason the crime rate went down in the last 20 years is because abortion kept a significant percentage of the children who would have been born to socio-economic groups most likely to commit violent crimes from ever being born.
User avatar
UncleKG
LP
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:57 am

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:24 am

Saint John wrote:
Never once in my entire life.



Maybe Behshad can hook you up :P :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:26 am

Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....


It's NOT legal there :P People just do it and get away with it. There is a difference :P
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Behshad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:31 am

StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....


It's NOT legal there :P People just do it and get away with it. There is a difference :P


We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy" 8)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:32 am

Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....


It's NOT legal there :P People just do it and get away with it. There is a difference :P


We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy" 8)


In a vote on a ballot that would make it legal :P :P :P
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Behshad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:35 am

StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....


It's NOT legal there :P People just do it and get away with it. There is a difference :P


We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy" 8)


In a vote on a ballot that would make it legal :P :P :P


Oh really? Well thanks for educationg us mortals on that issue! :lol:
You totally missed my point, cause youre drunk, not high!!!
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Clasicrockldy » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:35 am

artist4perry wrote:
Clasicrockldy wrote:Polls open in a half an hour here. Once I drop my daughter off at school, I am going to vote. :D


Dr. Who fan? :D


Yep! Are you??? :D
Image Image

"Friends are the family that you choose."
User avatar
Clasicrockldy
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4146
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:38 am
Location: In The TARDIS

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:37 am

Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
conversationpc wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Sarah wrote:Thank you.

Btw gay marriage has been legal in CA for some time now... has it really affected hetero lives that much? No.


My neighbor marrying his golden retriever won't affect my life, but that doesn't mean it's not stupid.


You're not seriously comparing a union between two human beings to a person marrying a housepet are you? Good god. :roll: Why is that the first place people go with that argument - always compare it to marrying animals... you all know there's no logical argument so suddenly you start reaching for stupid comparisions. Come on Dan, you're more intelligent than that.


It isn't all that far fetched, if you think about it. Once you start breaking down the barriers, the argument against allowing polygamy, for instance, isn't all that strong.


I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy. If majority wants gay marriage then too bad for the minority who don't. That's what makes voting so great.


I doubt that youve ever visited Kentucky, Tenessee or Alabama :lol: or Utah.....


It's NOT legal there :P People just do it and get away with it. There is a difference :P


We were'nt talking about LEGAL...
You said "I doubt you would find a majority to agree on animal marriage or polygamy" 8)


In a vote on a ballot that would make it legal :P :P :P


Oh really? Well thanks for educationg us mortals on that issue! :lol:
You totally missed my point, cause youre drunk, not high!!!


I'm not drunk.....yet :lol: And you missed my point, I got yours. You were making a joke, I realize that :P Now go hook dan up with some good girl porn :shock: :P :lol: Maybe that will soften him a little on the gay issues :wink: :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Eric » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:39 am

JohnnyMac


He gave up everything for his country proving he has the convictions to put us first. He doesn't want to reward the lazy. He doesn't have a very sketchy background. He doesn't think Affirmative Action is a great way of life. His wife doesn't make me sick. His health care plan won't bankrupt this country. He warned us about Subprime loans, whereas Obama and his cronies theatened racism for anyone objecting to them. He works with both parties. He won't create a one party rule with Pelosi/Reid. He's experienced. He was right about the surge. He loves his country.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3934
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:41 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Tito wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Tito wrote:can you at least vote FOR Proposition 8 for your good friend Tito. It will make me happy and I make it worth your time. Thank you.



You don't even live in California, what are you worried about prop 8 for.
Its already legal there anyway. Face it... that's a lost battle.

Ladies, do ME a favor and vote the way YOU want, not because some homophobe halfway across the country tells you what to choose. Thank you.


Fuck you. It's only legal (hopefully temporarily) because of a judge(s). It is not a lost battle. It has never passed when it's been on the ballot.


Look man, I am as conservative as it gets on most issues, but not letting people live their lives and love who they want to, and pass on their weath and visit their loved ones in a hospital is just wrong.

The homosexuals in this country should have every right we do, irrespective of their sexual preference.

Why does it matter to you how people live thier lives?? If they are morally wrong it is not for you to judge, but for God.


If it's immoral then why legalize it? What's next NAMBLA?

You are looking at it wrong. If we truly had a libertarian or strict constitution interpretation then your argument may hold water. Here's the problem, you're saying they should have those rights. However, I don't have any rights to disapprove of their behavior. Specifically, I don't have have the right to refuse service to them if I want, or fire them if I want, or calling them a name if I want. I have no individual right to disown this behavior. If I did any of the above I would be sued and probably lose my business or be charged with a (unconstitutional) hate crime. I am forced to accept and tolerate their behavior. Therefore, the battle lines are drawn. They want so called equality, how about reinstalling my individual constitutional rights first or at least at the same time. Until that happens no f-cking way.

Furthermore, I'm already starting to see people say conservatives should modify their approach i.e. drop or minimize social issues. First of all, with the possible exception of abortion, we are not the ones who started it. The left are the ones who want to change not conservatives who are mostly just trying to defend the status quo. If social issues are to be taken off the table, than the left should be the ones to drop it and not the right. Conservatives are not trying to take away or change the 2nd admendment or 1st admendment,etc. That's the left with gun control and hate speech. We did not start this fight. We are only playing defense. I wish we would go on offense.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Deb » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:47 am

StevePerryHair wrote: I'm not drunk.....yet :lol: And you missed my point, I got yours. You were making a joke, I realize that :P Now go hook dan up with some good girl porn :shock: :P :lol: Maybe that will soften him a little on the gay issues :wink: :lol:


Are you sure soften is the right word? :lol: :P
Last edited by Deb on Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby artist4perry » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:47 am

Clasicrockldy wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
Clasicrockldy wrote:Polls open in a half an hour here. Once I drop my daughter off at school, I am going to vote. :D


Dr. Who fan? :D


Yep! Are you??? :D

Yes! Loved the old one with the curly headed guy, and some of the new ones. I laughed at the reference to the "tardis".
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Saint John » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:48 am

UncleKG wrote:Legalizing gay marriage will end mankind?...ummmmm....because if it becomes legal, EVERYONE will suddenly turn gay? Hmmmm....that's completely logical.
No, moron. I'm referring to acknowledging and granting rights to perverse behavior. Let gays do what they want in private. It's just that it's not a natural union and shouldn't be acknowledged. I want to marry my G.I. Joe army toy. Is that okay too?


UncleKG wrote:Marriage is only for people to procreate (that is what you intimated in your argument above)? So, by your logic, if a male-female couple either can't or choose not to have a kid, then their marriage shouldn't be recognized either?
I never said that. The fact that the capacity, by some complex design, doesn't exist leads me to believe that it's not meant to happen. Again, people can ram each others shit tunnels til the cows come home, but I don't think states should recognize it.

UncleKG wrote:WHO CARES IF GAY PEOPLE MARRY, and if you do care, WHY? Being that keeping gay marriage illegal is in no way going to decrease the number of gay people in the world, I think the wiser move is to teach your children how YOU feel about homosexuality and then hope they don't find a person of the same sex attractive. That's about the best you can do.
I care enough to argue about it and nothing more. Again, if 2 women want to strap on plastic clubs and role play, fine.

UncleKG wrote:I'm always amused how conservatives say, "Keep government out of my business," but when it comes to someone else's business, THAT's a whole different story.
One of the government's job is to discriminate who is and isn't capable of logical thought. Just like we aid severely mentally disabled people with their choices we must also aid homosexuals with their skewed logic.

UncleKG wrote:I also ask this question of everyone who's Pro-Life, but who are also against Welfare and other social programs. Pray tell, if abortion is illegal, who do you think is going to end up picking up the tab for all those children? If you don't want to allow women to not have children they either don't want or are not equipped to raise, then I assume you're willing to take those kids in and rear them yourselves, right? If not, then you're OK with tens of thousands of homeless and unwanted street urchins, who will then likely become thieves and maladjusted criminals, stealing to survive, right? But, if they break into your house to steal some food, it should be OK for you to shoot them, right? So, you want them to live and grow up to a ripe enough age where you can eliminate them yourself? OK, I get it now.
There are tons of people dying to adopt.
Last edited by Saint John on Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:48 am

My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby artist4perry » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:50 am

McCain/Palin
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:52 am

Deb wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote: I'm not drunk.....yet :lol: And you missed my point, I got yours. You were making a joke, I realize that :P Now go hook dan up with some good girl porn :shock: :P :lol: Maybe that will soften him a little on the gay issues :wink: :lol:


Are you sure soften is the right word? :lol: :P



:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby RumTumJM » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:54 am

Well I, myself, voted for McCain by absentee ballot.

Being with my campus's radio station, we are doing A HUGE blowout tonight to cover the results as they come in. It is set to be 6 pm EST - ?.

I must say, I am losing hope in McCain. I am trying to keep believing but it is not looking good. Hopefully, I am just getting a wrong impression with all the Obama maniacs you get on a college campus in CT.


We shall see!
http://twitter.com/RockNationRadio

"Whatever doesn't kill you, makes you...ROCK!"
-Brian May, Queen
User avatar
RumTumJM
LP
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Location: Long Island, NY

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:57 am

LOL Typical liberal.

UncleKG wrote:I don't understand why anyone cares if two people want to get married. If they want to bring the government into their relationship, hey, more power to them. They have just as much right to be miserable and get half their stuff taken away in a divorce as the next person.

You act like gay people do it on their front lawn and force you to rent a lawn chair and watch it....and I say this as a heterosexual male.


You're only miserable if your in a bad marriage.

Go to a gay pride parade sometime or some gay neighborhoods, hell go to the Minneapolis airport men's restroom. Go to any forest preserve in the Chicago area or up to Montrose Harbor if you don't think they don't do it in public. When my mom worked at the DuPage County courthouse they average 5 (homo) public indecencies cases a week from the forest preseves. Also, I have friends who work for the forest preserve district and you won't believe what they see and find in the forest preserves.

UncleKG wrote:Marriage is only for people to procreate (that is what you intimated in your argument above)? So, by your logic, if a male-female couple either can't or choose not to have a kid, then their marriage shouldn't be recognized either?


Personally, I don't get it. Unless it's because they can't have children, I don't know why anyone would marry without having kids. What's the point. I would never marry someone who did not want to have children.

UncleKG wrote:I'm always amused how conservatives say, "Keep government out of my business," but when it comes to someone else's business, THAT's a whole different story.


Technically, government will be in their business with gay marriage. Like I said in a different post. The government will force me to accept this behavior. Specifically, I cannot fire or refuse service to a gay couple. If I owned an Insurance company I am forced to pick up their "spouse" even if I don't want to. I know they arleady have domestic partners they must accept but is that right? Plus, churches will probably now have to accept homosexuals as wells. If I/we do any of the above, I would be sued and/or charged with a hate crime.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:59 am

artist4perry wrote:McCain/Palin


I love you.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:59 am

ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:00 am

Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Tito » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:01 am

StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P


I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol:
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Behshad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:02 am

Tito wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P


I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol:


She's already married. :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:02 am

Tito wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P


I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol:


Was that an internet proposition? Cause then prog can go and answer that poll from last week :P
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby Behshad » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:03 am

StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P


I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol:


Was that an internet proposition? Cause then prog can go and answer that poll from last week :P


Um,, I think Tito was talking about YOU and HIM getting married !!!
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby AlteredDNA » Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:08 am

Behshad wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
Tito wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:My first ever Presidential election....

My finger hovered over Bob Barr briefly... (I'm a registered Democrat who identifies more with Libertarians... I'm weird, I know)

....but I followed my gut, my convictions, and my heart and voted for JOHN S. MCCAIN!


I love you too.



That sounds a little gay :shock: :P


I know. Maybe we can get married in a few years. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol:


Was that an internet proposition? Cause then prog can go and answer that poll from last week :P


Um,, I think Tito was talking about YOU and HIM getting married !!!


Image
I Love Pineapple!!!
User avatar
AlteredDNA
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests