Moderator: Andrew
Red13JoePa wrote:Penn State's got as much claim to the 2 spot as ANYbody now.
And Utah if not Boise should be ahead of ALL the other bastards.
ScarabGator wrote:to be released later today...this is surprising considering the boston boys(enigma) claims about our cupcake schedule. You'd think with such a patsy schedule we played no way we'd get this type of ranking in the BCS, huh enigma?????? Guess hes just sore that the Dolphins have owned NE this year and the Rays punked the red sox asses.....
Enigma869 wrote:ScarabGator wrote:to be released later today...this is surprising considering the boston boys(enigma) claims about our cupcake schedule. You'd think with such a patsy schedule we played no way we'd get this type of ranking in the BCS, huh enigma?????? Guess hes just sore that the Dolphins have owned NE this year and the Rays punked the red sox asses.....
You really are a fucking idiot. A couple of points here, fanboy. First and foremost, I really don't care about college football, for the 100th time. It's not even a real fucking sport. I could care less what the fucking computers say about where your pussy school ranks. You're the only one on this board bragging about your team potentially ranking 3rd. Big fucking deal! Just one more reason you Florida fans are fucking clueless. Ranking third wins you nothing, moron! I could care less if Florida wins the Computer Chamionship. Again, it means absolutely nothing. As for your Dolphins comment, I wasn't aware that you were now claiming them as your own. As for your comment about the Dolphins having "owned" the Patriots, get back to me when the Patriots have a real QB playing for them and not some guy who didn't even play college football!
ScarabGator wrote:John, the Dolphins have Chad Pennington. Do you really think hes an upgrade from what NE has???
ScarabGator wrote:Yeah, Im a Dolphin when I keep up with the NFL becuase I am originally from Miami, born and raised.
ScarabGator wrote:And let me tell you why being ranked 3rd means something right now-Florida plays #1 in 2 weeks. Beat FSU this saturday and guess what happens if we beat #1? A trip to Miami is ours....part of that "Computer Championship" is votes from humans also.....
Enigma869 wrote:ScarabGator wrote:John, the Dolphins have Chad Pennington. Do you really think hes an upgrade from what NE has???
He is absolutely an updgrade. You conveniently forget to mention that Chad Pennington has been a starting NFL QB for many years and Matt Cassel never got on the field during his entire college career. There is simply no comparison. Also, Pennington stepped in to be the starter for a team who lost 15 games last season, while Cassel was forced to step in on a team who didn't lose a single game during the regular season last year. Again, no comparison.ScarabGator wrote:Yeah, Im a Dolphin when I keep up with the NFL becuase I am originally from Miami, born and raised.
Then why the hell are you in here bragging about the Tampa Ray Devil Dogs? Last I checked, Miami has their own baseball team. Why aren't you in here bragging about the pathetic Marlins? That's like someone rooting for the Bengals and Browns.ScarabGator wrote:And let me tell you why being ranked 3rd means something right now-Florida plays #1 in 2 weeks. Beat FSU this saturday and guess what happens if we beat #1? A trip to Miami is ours....part of that "Computer Championship" is votes from humans also.....
Get back to me when you actually start following a real sport that is determined by head to head matchups on the playing field!
ScarabGator wrote:I pull for all the teams in Florida. Not just the ones who win like you do up there. Anytime ANY Florida team plays they have my support, I dont care who they are. Yeah, Pennington is a MAJOR stud....
Ehwmatt wrote:But, college football isn't a real sport, John? Come on. On what basis?
Ehwmatt wrote:Most NFL players do play college football before they come to the league, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.
Ehwmatt wrote:If you have a problem with the BCS system, join the club. But that doesn't denigrate the entire game at the college level, not by a long shot.
Saint John wrote:Miami has a nice football team this year and have been a pleasant surprise. I'm extremely interested in seeing how New England is going to counter the "wildcat" formation they had so much trouble with the last time they played the Dolphins.
I did...now I just need your home address in case they don't win.Enigma869 wrote:SJ...I hope that you took my advice and laid your dough down on the Patriots.
Enigma869 wrote:
That's your opinion. I don't agree. If college football continues to allow humans (who are not players) and computers determine who their champion will be, none of the other stuff matters. They need to lose their overtime system as well, along with the NFL!
Red13JoePa wrote:Bowl season is my favorite time of year, I'm a junkie and for better or worse devour every single one of them from the pre-NYD ones, which reward teams that have had good solid years, on through the BCS bowls.
Enigma869 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:But, college football isn't a real sport, John? Come on. On what basis?
I don't have enough time to cover everything that is wrong with college football. No sport that determines their "National Champion" based on the subjective opinion of humans will ever be a real sport, in my opinion. Their overtime system is beyond goofy, and allowing people and computers to decide who plays in the title game is offensive to most real sports fans. I can assure you that I'm not alone in this opinion. I played and coached football for over 20 years, and I haven't encountered many people who don't believe the way college football is presently structured isn't completely ridiculous...
Ehwmatt wrote: I know in your world you're right and the rest of us are dopes,
Ehwmatt wrote:but shockingly enough, that's all your opinion too.
Ehwmatt wrote: The BCS system sucks, I'll be the first to admit that
Ehwmatt wrote: college football has great athleticism, drama, excitement, atmosphere etc. that I (and I'd venture to say most fans) really embrace.
Ehwmatt wrote: If you're letting the crappy BCS title determination system keep you from watching great sport, then hey, more power to you I guess.
StocktontoMalone wrote:For starters, why do receivers only need to get ONE foot in bounds?
Enigma869 wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:For starters, why do receivers only need to get ONE foot in bounds?
And why the hell is the clock stopped after EVERY first down to move the chains? Is a running clock too much of a distraction for the chain gangThat seems like way too much freakin' work. Let the damn clock run, unless someones gets out of bounds or there is an incomplete pass.
StocktontoMalone wrote:And like in the TT/OU game last night....once the player is out of bounds ti should not matter if the ball comes out. The rules are such a crock of shit.
Correct. You can catch it, control it, but if you fall out of bounds afterward and drop the ball it is not a catch. The rule is stupid because at the instant the player hits the ground out of bounds the play is over anyway so it shouldn't matter if he holds on to the ball or not...but in college it does matter.Enigma869 wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:And like in the TT/OU game last night....once the player is out of bounds ti should not matter if the ball comes out. The rules are such a crock of shit.
You got me here dude. The ball is still live if the player is out of bounds or are you saying that if the player loses possession out of bounds that it doesn't count as a catch?
Enigma869 wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:And like in the TT/OU game last night....once the player is out of bounds ti should not matter if the ball comes out. The rules are such a crock of shit.
You got me here dude. The ball is still live if the player is out of bounds or are you saying that if the player loses possession out of bounds that it doesn't count as a catch?
Saint John wrote:Correct. You can catch it, control it, but if you fall out of bounds afterward and drop the ball it is not a catch. The rule is stupid because at the instant the player hits the ground out of bounds the play is over anyway so it shouldn't matter if he holds on to the ball or not...but in college it does matter.
I agree, John. Should he have to bring it back to the fucking huddle too???Enigma869 wrote:Saint John wrote:Correct. You can catch it, control it, but if you fall out of bounds afterward and drop the ball it is not a catch. The rule is stupid because at the instant the player hits the ground out of bounds the play is over anyway so it shouldn't matter if he holds on to the ball or not...but in college it does matter.
Wow...that's shocking. I didn't even know about that rule. How the hell did they ever come up with this absurd rule? I agree with you...Once the dude is out of bounds, the play is over, so it shouldn't matter what happens to the ball after that. Thanks for giving me another reason to laugh at this idiotic game!
Enigma869 wrote:ScarabGator wrote:College football sucks, nothing good about it-that about sum it up John????
That about sums it up, fuckwad!
Enigma869 wrote:ScarabGator wrote:College football sucks, nothing good about it-that about sum it up John????
That about sums it up, fuckwad!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests