Moderator: Andrew
StocktontoMalone wrote:xflajrnylvr wrote:whether it was or not it wasnt called ive seen 2 calls that should have been againist bama that werent called
Still a great game
And?
Which ones?
xflajrnylvr wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:xflajrnylvr wrote:whether it was or not it wasnt called ive seen 2 calls that should have been againist bama that werent called
Still a great game
And?
Which ones?
face mask on a return on James and the hit on the sideline which ill agree was a good non call but could have gone either way
BUt ill agree with angel all games have bad and missed calls They are part of the game humans cant see everything
You just hope one isnt made that decides the outcomes of the games
Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Rick wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:MidNightTrain wrote:Rick wrote:The winner of the SEC will play the winner of Oklahoma/Missouri. I'm just spouting off.
If Missouri somehow wins it unfortuantley will be USC vs Florida/Alabama for the National Championship. There is an unwritten rule that you can't be in the National Champion game if you are not a conference champion, so unfortunately Texas (although beat Oklahoma) is out.
I believe it's a written rule now, brought on when Oklahoma lost to Kansas State in the Conference championship game and still advanced to the National Championship game (Where they got their rightful deserts from USC)
Ahem...
LSU beat OU for the National Championship that year...
Carry on...
Yes, you did. What was that, 2004? It was kind of a low scoring game, but OU never had the upper hand in that game. LSU was great that year. It had been a long time for them.
2003...
And the last one before that was 1958...and then of course last year...
My bad, I got confused by all the ass whuppin's OU was a part of.
USC and LSU were co-champions that year.
Really? What championship game did USC play in that year?
They didn't have to play in one, they won from being number one in the polls, the old fashion way (and they got pretty rings too).![]()
Their BCS ring came the next year.
AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Rick wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:MidNightTrain wrote:Rick wrote:The winner of the SEC will play the winner of Oklahoma/Missouri. I'm just spouting off.
If Missouri somehow wins it unfortuantley will be USC vs Florida/Alabama for the National Championship. There is an unwritten rule that you can't be in the National Champion game if you are not a conference champion, so unfortunately Texas (although beat Oklahoma) is out.
I believe it's a written rule now, brought on when Oklahoma lost to Kansas State in the Conference championship game and still advanced to the National Championship game (Where they got their rightful deserts from USC)
Ahem...
LSU beat OU for the National Championship that year...
Carry on...
Yes, you did. What was that, 2004? It was kind of a low scoring game, but OU never had the upper hand in that game. LSU was great that year. It had been a long time for them.
2003...
And the last one before that was 1958...and then of course last year...
My bad, I got confused by all the ass whuppin's OU was a part of.
USC and LSU were co-champions that year.
Really? What championship game did USC play in that year?
They didn't have to play in one, they won from being number one in the polls, the old fashion way (and they got pretty rings too).![]()
Their BCS ring came the next year.
Number 1 in 1 Poll, a poll that had agreed, like the PAC10, that the BCS number 1 would be the National Champion...
Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Rick wrote:AlteredDNA wrote:Gunbot wrote:MidNightTrain wrote:Rick wrote:The winner of the SEC will play the winner of Oklahoma/Missouri. I'm just spouting off.
If Missouri somehow wins it unfortuantley will be USC vs Florida/Alabama for the National Championship. There is an unwritten rule that you can't be in the National Champion game if you are not a conference champion, so unfortunately Texas (although beat Oklahoma) is out.
I believe it's a written rule now, brought on when Oklahoma lost to Kansas State in the Conference championship game and still advanced to the National Championship game (Where they got their rightful deserts from USC)
Ahem...
LSU beat OU for the National Championship that year...
Carry on...
Yes, you did. What was that, 2004? It was kind of a low scoring game, but OU never had the upper hand in that game. LSU was great that year. It had been a long time for them.
2003...
And the last one before that was 1958...and then of course last year...
My bad, I got confused by all the ass whuppin's OU was a part of.
USC and LSU were co-champions that year.
Really? What championship game did USC play in that year?
They didn't have to play in one, they won from being number one in the polls, the old fashion way (and they got pretty rings too).![]()
Their BCS ring came the next year.
Number 1 in 1 Poll, a poll that had agreed, like the PAC10, that the BCS number 1 would be the National Champion...
The AP did award USC a national championship trophy, so it's not USC's fault. We'll give you that one though. 10 championships instead of 11, fair enough?
Nothing toi be ashamed of Bama has a very good teamBabyblue wrote:Big deal![]()
![]()
I still love my Bama team.
ROLL TIDE!
Angel wrote:xflajrnylvr wrote:Nothing toi be ashamed of Bama has a very good teamBabyblue wrote:Big deal![]()
![]()
I still love my Bama team.
ROLL TIDE!
Yep, agreed. Very good game, they were a tough opponent.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests