YoungJRNY wrote:Rhi is going for a record for the most run-throughs of avatars in a day. She is a nice compete to Fufu!
new one just for you, Trav ...

Moderator: Andrew
DrFU wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:Rhi is going for a record for the most run-throughs of avatars in a day. She is a nice compete to Fufu!
new one just for you, Trav ...
NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
YoungJRNY wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
Ravens might be favored, but by the looks at it, deep down, they are the one critics are picking. Only thing you hear is how you can't beat a team 3 times in a season (which happened 11 times the past 18 I believe.) The Ravens BYE week was in September, and this is their 18th straight game. Like Cowher said in the studio, they can't live on Adrenalin forever, and with The Steelers losing as many Championship games as they did at home the past years, I don't see them losing this game. Flacco might of had a good season, but January Football in Pittsburgh isn't Delaware anymore.
NealIsGod wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
Ravens might be favored, but by the looks at it, deep down, they are the one critics are picking. Only thing you hear is how you can't beat a team 3 times in a season (which happened 11 times the past 18 I believe.) The Ravens BYE week was in September, and this is their 18th straight game. Like Cowher said in the studio, they can't live on Adrenalin forever, and with The Steelers losing as many Championship games as they did at home the past years, I don't see them losing this game. Flacco might of had a good season, but January Football in Pittsburgh isn't Delaware anymore.
Neither is January football in Nashville, but Flacco is the one who did not throw a pick, completed three clutch passes, and led the game-winning drive. Nothing fazes Joe Cool.
Steelers are favored by 6, BTW.
Since 78 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
Um, I did.
Me Too!
Rhiannon wrote:Rick wrote:Since 78 wrote:Rhiannon wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
Um, I did.
Me Too!
That's two nobodies. NIG was right.![]()
![]()
You ever been beaten with your own shoe?
StocktontoMalone wrote:Pitt had an overtime win....(luck of the coin toss), and a Motherfucking gift of a call on the touchdown that wasn't. Feet in, ball out. Any fool could see the ball didn't cross the plane.....TWO lucky wins. TWO.
YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Pitt had an overtime win....(luck of the coin toss), and a Motherfucking gift of a call on the touchdown that wasn't. Feet in, ball out. Any fool could see the ball didn't cross the plane.....TWO lucky wins. TWO.
The initial call on the field was in fact ruled short of the endzone. The replay had to come from upstairs and a booth review to challenge the play, which at that time the people upstairs saw something that needed to be reviewed. After several minutes, they in fact over-ruled the call and announced it a Touchdown. You think they would of over-turned it if they were certain the ball didn't touch the plane? I don't think so.
I've never read a more ignorant post regarding a football game. Before you start your ramblings and complete imbecile tirades, check the facts. Baltimore indeed won the coin toss in the first game that went into overtime, and elected to receive. On that first drive of OT, Lawrence Timmons sacked Flacco deep in his zone, and they punted to Pitt. We then drove down to score the game winning field goal. Luck of the coin toss my ass. Jesus fuckin' Christ.
Oh yeah, one other thing, the ball DOESN'T have to CROSS the white line in order for it to be ruled a touchdown. It simply has to BREAK IT, and by looking at replays, that's exactly what it did. I like you Malone, but you're the one that's the fool.
We BEAT Baltimore TWICE. TWICE!
StocktontoMalone wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Pitt had an overtime win....(luck of the coin toss), and a Motherfucking gift of a call on the touchdown that wasn't. Feet in, ball out. Any fool could see the ball didn't cross the plane.....TWO lucky wins. TWO.
The initial call on the field was in fact ruled short of the endzone. The replay had to come from upstairs and a booth review to challenge the play, which at that time the people upstairs saw something that needed to be reviewed. After several minutes, they in fact over-ruled the call and announced it a Touchdown. You think they would of over-turned it if they were certain the ball didn't touch the plane? I don't think so.
I've never read a more ignorant post regarding a football game. Before you start your ramblings and complete imbecile tirades, check the facts. Baltimore indeed won the coin toss in the first game that went into overtime, and elected to receive. On that first drive of OT, Lawrence Timmons sacked Flacco deep in his zone, and they punted to Pitt. We then drove down to score the game winning field goal. Luck of the coin toss my ass. Jesus fuckin' Christ.
Oh yeah, one other thing, the ball DOESN'T have to CROSS the white line in order for it to be ruled a touchdown. It simply has to BREAK IT, and by looking at replays, that's exactly what it did. I like you Malone, but you're the one that's the fool.
We BEAT Baltimore TWICE. TWICE!
My bad on the coin toss. I apologize....but as far as the TD, semantics, my friend, break/cross....whatever. I said cross the PLANE. Same as break the PLANE....The ball did not break the plane. I challenge ANYONE on this board(and be serious) to say otherwise. You will not get ONE other person who thinks that was a legit call....
StocktontoMalone wrote:Trav, your picture link is broken....
here's one for you.....
http://www.faniq.com/blog/Video-Santonio-Holmes-Controversial-Game-Winning-Touchdown-Catch-Pittsburgh-Steelers-Vs-Baltimore-Ravens-Blog-16139
OWNED!!!!
Saint John wrote:I don't have a dog in the fight but I remember watching the game and thinking "That's a touchdown." I thought the replay was pretty clear.
StocktontoMalone wrote:Saint John wrote:I don't have a dog in the fight but I remember watching the game and thinking "That's a touchdown." I thought the replay was pretty clear.
But here's the rub.....
The referees took it to instant replay, and these were his exact words:
"After reviewing the play, the receiver had 2 feet down in the end zone, with possession of the ball. We have a touchdown."
Sound like the criteria for a TD to you? Perhaps on the endlines, but not on the GOAL LINE.....
YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Saint John wrote:I don't have a dog in the fight but I remember watching the game and thinking "That's a touchdown." I thought the replay was pretty clear.
But here's the rub.....
The referees took it to instant replay, and these were his exact words:
"After reviewing the play, the receiver had 2 feet down in the end zone, with possession of the ball. We have a touchdown."
Sound like the criteria for a TD to you? Perhaps on the endlines, but not on the GOAL LINE.....
In a nut-shell what he was saying is that everything that was needed to score on that certain play, in fact did meet the credentials. It was a touchdown.
StocktontoMalone wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:Saint John wrote:I don't have a dog in the fight but I remember watching the game and thinking "That's a touchdown." I thought the replay was pretty clear.
But here's the rub.....
The referees took it to instant replay, and these were his exact words:
"After reviewing the play, the receiver had 2 feet down in the end zone, with possession of the ball. We have a touchdown."
Sound like the criteria for a TD to you? Perhaps on the endlines, but not on the GOAL LINE.....
In a nut-shell what he was saying is that everything that was needed to score on that certain play, in fact did meet the credentials. It was a touchdown.
We'll agree to disagree....But I still think you are a great, dedicated sports fan, Trav.....![]()
Good Luck this weekend.....
NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picks the Ravens to win this Sunday either. Love it!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent
NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picked the Ravens to win last week either.
StocktontoMalone wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nobody picks the Ravens to win this Sunday either. Love it!
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/features/talent
As sad as this sounds.....unless they can break through the PITT o-line and rattle Ben....they haven't a sperm's chance in Friga's peckah!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests