yulog wrote:Crisis? what Crisis?
That is hilarious. I may have nightmares tonight though.
Moderator: Andrew
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:Yep this is "How to create Tyranny in four easy steps"
1. Create a Crisis
2. Scare the Shit out of everybod
3. Solve the crisis with big govermment.
4.Ensure the solution is a permamant fixture.
Obamas following the playbook perfectly and knows exactly what he is doing.
Fact Finder wrote:Well hells bells...I told you so...The Obama administration will ask Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said this morning.
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is set to argue for the new powers at a hearing today on Capitol Hill about the furor over bonuses paid to executives at American International Group, which the government has propped up with about $180 billion in federal aid. Administration officials have said that the proposed authority would have allowed them to seize AIG last fall and wind down its operations at less cost to taxpayers.
The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.
Geithner will testify alongside Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke at a hearing before the House Financial Services Committee that begins at 10 a.m. Although the stated focus of the hearing is the controversial bonus payments AIG awarded its employees after receiving the government bailout, Geithner will try to advance the argument that the government needs more tools in its arsenal in order to right the nation's economic ship. ad_icon
"We need resolution authority to go in and be able to change contracts, be able to change the business model, unwind what doesn't work," Gibbs said on CNN in one of several morning television interviews aimed at promoting the administration proposal. " . . . This is the exact type of authority that will allow us to deal with the problems in AIG . . . that will address the systemic risk without having to put [a failing firm] in bankruptcy."
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Uhh, it was not Barack Obama who forced Paulson and Bernake to hold an emergency meeting with Bush and told him we were facing a global meltdown.
Do you assholes even read the news?
Fact Finder wrote:stevew2 wrote:wall street is look up thanks to Obama bitches
Dow down 75 point at the open.....and....
Deacon wrote:No, but it is President Obama that is still spending as though it is a global disaster/meltdown.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:That's because it is.
Anyone yet to reach that conclusion has no business being in the political thread.
conversationpc wrote:The only time you've given Stu props is when he agrees or sort of agrees with you.
conversationpc wrote:Anyone who intellectually and honestly vehemently disagrees with you is automatically swathed with one of your catchy little, and typically homoerotic, epithets.
Deacon wrote:Then is he not practicing the very steps that had been listed that you demonized with a Bush reference?
Barb wrote:His hero is a big fat zero and everyone is starting to notice.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Right.
A “big fat zero” juggling two wars, a depression, and in his down time, even tackling the political third rail of healthcare.
By this same time during Bush’s term, the only thing accomplished was boot spur marks on the oval office desk.
That, and Cheney had settled on either fuchsia or chartreuse for the walls of his undisclosed apocalypse bunker.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:His hero is a big fat zero and everyone is starting to notice.
Right.
A “big fat zero” juggling two wars, a depression, and in his down time, even tackling the political third rail of healthcare.
By this same time during Bush’s term, the only thing accomplished was boot spur marks on the oval office desk.
That, and Cheney had settled on either fuchsia or chartreuse for the walls of his undisclosed apocalypse bunker.
Why don’t you just come out and say it Barb: You hope Obama (and by extension, this country) fails.
It’s soo obvious the radical Right would rather watch this nation burn to the ground than cede an inch of political power.
I will say this; if Barack Obama leaves this country in as bad a shape as the last guy, I will at least have the baseline decency to own up to mistakes and respectfully support the new guy. Much in the classy way Stu’s been towards Obama.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:His hero is a big fat zero and everyone is starting to notice.
Right.
A “big fat zero” juggling two wars, a depression, and in his down time, even tackling the political third rail of healthcare.
By this same time during Bush’s term, the only thing accomplished was boot spur marks on the oval office desk.
That, and Cheney had settled on either fuchsia or chartreuse for the walls of his undisclosed apocalypse bunker.
Why don’t you just come out and say it Barb: You hope Obama (and by extension, this country) fails.
It’s soo obvious the radical Right would rather watch this nation burn to the ground than cede an inch of political power.
I will say this; if Barack Obama leaves this country in as bad a shape as the last guy, I will at least have the baseline decency to own up to mistakes and respectfully support the new guy. Much in the classy way Stu’s been towards Obama.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I didn't demonize Bush.
This is an economic maelstrom of tempest proportions.
Did Congress do what Congress always does, and shoehorn pet earmarks into legislation?
Sure.
But to say Obama "created the crisis", or that somehow, by giving engineers jobs he will "create tyranny" is beneath stupid.
Barb wrote:Here's a column in the Canadian Free Press wondering why the American people seem to be silently sitting by and watching their country be destroyed.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
7 Wishes wrote:Barb wrote:Here's a column in the Canadian Free Press wondering why the American people seem to be silently sitting by and watching their country be destroyed.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
Way to emerge unsullied after quoting what is obviously an unbiased source.![]()
"A Conservative Free Press," reads the top of the page, in bold-faced letters.
Anyway, now that we've cleared that hurdle,
But capitalism is public enemy #1 in America today, thanks to decades of class warfare and the art of division via social envy, all for purpose of political gain.
What does it feel like to be so deluded that you actually believe statements like these? Remarkable. Please name a way in which the current Administration is "corrupt". We barely survived eight years of the worst Domestic, International, and Fiscal policy the nation has ever seen...let alone the pandering, lies, and illegality.
Barb wrote:See, that's what you and TNC refuse to accept -- there ARE different viewpoints.
Barb wrote:It's not a matter of wanting him to fail, TNC. I am a conservative. By definition, that means I disagree with his ideas on how to fix this mess.
Barb wrote:If by some miracle, spending trillions and going bankrupt makes America strong and the people prosper again, I will give him full credit. I just don't see it happening.
Barb wrote:Here's a column in the Canadian Free Press wondering why the American people seem to be silently sitting by and watching their country be destroyed.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:It's not a matter of wanting him to fail, TNC. I am a conservative. By definition, that means I disagree with his ideas on how to fix this mess.
As an American, by definition, you should put the well being of your country before party affiliation.
And before you argue that Obama's ideas will only harm America, what of the billions in tax cuts he included to sweeten the deal for aisle opposites like you?Barb wrote:If by some miracle, spending trillions and going bankrupt makes America strong and the people prosper again, I will give him full credit. I just don't see it happening.
Maybe he could raise taxes like Reagan and Bush Sr. did to close the deficit?
Oh wait, we're not allowed to talk about that...Barb wrote:Here's a column in the Canadian Free Press wondering why the American people seem to be silently sitting by and watching their country be destroyed.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9607
Great.
Another demagogical editorial.
Got any ideas or solutions of your own?
Barb wrote:1. I don't think Obama's plans ARE good for this country, thus the reason for my opposition.
Barb wrote:2. Obama doesn't give a rats ass about the deficit, thus the reason he is quadrupling it.
Barb wrote:3. Posting an opinion piece for others to read doesn't mean I don't have my own thoughts.
Barb wrote:4. How supportive of George W. Bush's policies were you? Because a lot of us thought his ideas were good for the country and you and others like you, did not. That's how it works. If I thought Obama was doing right by this country, I would say so.
Barb wrote:I had hoped he wouldn't be as radical as some predicted, but unfortunately, he is worse -- MUCH WORSE!
Barb wrote:I can't believe YOU of ALL PEOPLE have the balls to say this to ANYONE else.
Fact Finder wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:Fact Finder wrote:I believe we've been edited.
Good. It was a bit outta line.
Somebody's randy....
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:I can't believe YOU of ALL PEOPLE have the balls to say this to ANYONE else.
Barb,
-----------------------
Thanks
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Barb wrote:I can't believe YOU of ALL PEOPLE have the balls to say this to ANYONE else.
Barb,
-----------------------
Thanks
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests