Moderator: Andrew
Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
He probably wiki'ed that shit. Another dope who thinks Wikipedia is the end all for factual information.
Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
He probably wiki'ed that shit. Another dope who thinks Wikipedia is the end all for factual information.
It was from the article that he posted a link to. Didn't you read it?
![]()
Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
He probably wiki'ed that shit. Another dope who thinks Wikipedia is the end all for factual information.
It was from the article that he posted a link to. Didn't you read it?
![]()
I'm talking about Al Gore.
Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
He probably wiki'ed that shit. Another dope who thinks Wikipedia is the end all for factual information.
It was from the article that he posted a link to. Didn't you read it?
![]()
I'm talking about Al Gore.
![]()
Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:Voyager wrote:"...today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role in global warming..."
Looks like Al Gore needs to do more homework.
He probably wiki'ed that shit. Another dope who thinks Wikipedia is the end all for factual information.
It was from the article that he posted a link to. Didn't you read it?
![]()
I'm talking about Al Gore.
![]()
You also missed my "Off The Wall" comment yesterday. You're either getting slower or my reluctance to use emoticons is having the effect of dooming my posts to continious misinterpretation.
strangegrey wrote:The problem with their warning cries, is that they have been claiming the world was going to implode for 20 years. Then, they dream up idiotic time-frames for their end of days, and when that day of days comes, we're still here and ocean levels are no different.
Was it Ted Danson in the late 80s that claimed we had 10 years before the oceans gobbled us up?
We're still here and so is Mr Danson.
Fucking idiot.
BobbyinTN wrote:Anyone that doesnt' believe man plays a part in the polluting of this planet and damaging it is an idiot.
Get your heads out of your republican leaders asses and learn something on your own without having to be told.
Rhiannon wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:Anyone that doesnt' believe man plays a part in the polluting of this planet and damaging it is an idiot.
Get your heads out of your republican leaders asses and learn something on your own without having to be told.
And conversely, stop gobbling up any type of political propaganda and realize that climate change has been a constant on this planet since the day it formed. I'm sure the shit we do doesn't help, but there is NOTHING we can do to stop the natural progression of a planet.
What will they say when the sun starts to die? ...Oh wait, it already did a few million years ago.
BobbyinTN wrote:That's just not true. We can stop pollutting the oceans to the point of poisoning every living creature in it. We can try recycling more and using less gasoline and trying to be just a little more careful. Claiming there is nothing we can do are the words of quitters and Rhiannon, I don't think you're a quitter and I know you're smart enough to know that those that think we can't do anything about global warming are the same ones who are afraid of losing a dime or two because of restrictions. It's about money, not about global warming.
Sarah wrote:Global warming may not be true but making our lifestyles more "green" can't hurt, so why not just recycle your beer cans, eat healthier, and support hybrids so we can all save money on gas, if nothing else? That's cool if you don't believe the global warming hype but I don't understand the resistance to changing a few things, hopefully for future generations' benefits.
Gunbot wrote:A little bit OT but has anyone figured out how much it costs to change a battery pack on a hybrid vehicle? Does it negate the savings accumulated from using less gas?
Rhiannon wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:That's just not true. We can stop pollutting the oceans to the point of poisoning every living creature in it. We can try recycling more and using less gasoline and trying to be just a little more careful. Claiming there is nothing we can do are the words of quitters and Rhiannon, I don't think you're a quitter and I know you're smart enough to know that those that think we can't do anything about global warming are the same ones who are afraid of losing a dime or two because of restrictions. It's about money, not about global warming.
You know what, I agree with you in part. No, we don't have to be slovenly fools putting waste into every natural resource and chopping down every tree. We can be educated consumers and regift what we take. I think carbon balance isn't a bad thing to strive for. But I also know that Earth has had ice ages, warming ages, massive floods, meteor impacts, and will again. And I know it's also a futile endeavor to think anything can be stopped or reversed. It is a indisputable FACT that the human race has numbered days. It is indisputable FACT that the Earth does as well.
The universe is infinitely expanding and our sun began to die the moment it was born. Stars die, the shockwave and resulting blackhole destroy their planetary systems.
We may have a responsibility to our home, but as a race, we're just deluding ourselves with thoughts of "global warming". Because Albie Gore wants you to blame yourself and stop using trash bags and driving your car. It's not going to happen. We're on a proven cooling trend right now. And the idiots who think our planet is going to fry in our lifetime are shitting their pants because most of the studies point to this cooling trend. Climates fluctuate.
Study a little bit on eco-archaeology or paleobotany. Every bit of earth has been tropical, desert, polar, and temperate over the course of the ages.
It's cool to want to be smart about your effect on your world, but it's simply ridiculous to campaign for others to wear jeans made out of recycled bottles because it just isn't going to change anything.
If you want to do all that? More power to you. The problem with it is, eventually you have politicians enforcing this garbage on you. It's all about stripping your freedoms. First they have to find enough idiots to support a stupid cause with fear.Sarah wrote:Global warming may not be true but making our lifestyles more "green" can't hurt, so why not just recycle your beer cans, eat healthier, and support hybrids so we can all save money on gas, if nothing else?
Throwing orange peels, coffee grounds and grease-stained pizza boxes in the trash will be against the law in San Francisco, and could even lead to a fine.
The Board of Supervisors voted 9-2 Tuesday to approve Mayor Gavin Newsom's proposal for the most comprehensive mandatory composting and recycling law in the country. It's an aggressive push to cut greenhouse gas emissions and have the city sending nothing to landfills or incinerators by 2020.
"San Francisco has the best recycling and composting programs in the nation," Newsom said, praising the board's vote on a plan that some residents had decried as heavy-handed and impractical. "We can build on our success."
The ordinance is expected to take effect this fall. The legislation calls for every residence and business in the city to have three separate color-coded bins for waste: blue for recycling, green for compost and black for trash.
Failing to properly sort your refuse could result in a fine after several warnings, but Newsom and other officials say fines will only be levied in the most egregious cases.
Fines for almost all residential customers and many small businesses - anyone who generates less than a cubic yard of refuse a week - are initially capped at $100. Businesses that don't have proper bins face escalating fines up to $500.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:If you want to do all that? More power to you. The problem with it is, eventually you have politicians enforcing this garbage on you. It's all about stripping your freedoms. First they have to find enough idiots to support a stupid cause with fear.Sarah wrote:Global warming may not be true but making our lifestyles more "green" can't hurt, so why not just recycle your beer cans, eat healthier, and support hybrids so we can all save money on gas, if nothing else?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... d=rss.newsThrowing orange peels, coffee grounds and grease-stained pizza boxes in the trash will be against the law in San Francisco, and could even lead to a fine.
The Board of Supervisors voted 9-2 Tuesday to approve Mayor Gavin Newsom's proposal for the most comprehensive mandatory composting and recycling law in the country. It's an aggressive push to cut greenhouse gas emissions and have the city sending nothing to landfills or incinerators by 2020.
"San Francisco has the best recycling and composting programs in the nation," Newsom said, praising the board's vote on a plan that some residents had decried as heavy-handed and impractical. "We can build on our success."
The ordinance is expected to take effect this fall. The legislation calls for every residence and business in the city to have three separate color-coded bins for waste: blue for recycling, green for compost and black for trash.
Failing to properly sort your refuse could result in a fine after several warnings, but Newsom and other officials say fines will only be levied in the most egregious cases.
Fines for almost all residential customers and many small businesses - anyone who generates less than a cubic yard of refuse a week - are initially capped at $100. Businesses that don't have proper bins face escalating fines up to $500.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 48 guests