Gunbot wrote:jrnyman28 wrote:Arkansas wrote:I gotta agree with this:
"Mr. Jackson received days of wall-to-wall coverage in the media," Martha Gillis wrote to the Washington Post. "Where was the coverage of my nephew or the other soldiers who died that week?"
"... the nonstop coverage of Jackson's death has become "totally ridiculous" and laughable." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,530361,00.html later~
Sadly, in America, we put our celebrities on a pedastal. This is our Princess Diana Memorial...
As I said earlier in the thread, Where is the consistency? When Susan Boyle was all over the news, G.I.s were still dying everyday in the Middle East, yet nothing from the public decrying the lack of coverage. Now that it's Wacko Jacko being the the focus of attention, all of a sudden there is noise from the peanut gallery.
Some people just don't have enough to bitch about and will use anything. You're right though. What we have here is a person who dislikes Michael Jackson. She hasn't had jack all to say about soldiers dying in the last 6 years, I bet, but she dislikes MJ and all the attention is ticking her off so she's going to use it to push her newly-invented agenda and pitch a fit. I didn't hear her or anyone else screaming about it when the news was overly saturated with all kinds of other ridiculous crap, like every season finale of Idol, or Britney Spears's wacky head-shaving escapade. I didn't hear this gripe during MJs 2005 trial, where he was in the news every day then, too.
But MJ dies and there are many people who severly dislike him because of the last 10 years or so, so they're going to cry about how he's getting so much attention. Come ON. It's Michael Jackson, what do you expect!
I say,
get over it. Turn off the coverage if it bothers you. Not one television in America lacks an off button or a channel changing button. I'm so sick of people having a hissy fit over something that is on tv or the radio in the country. Just turn it off! Jiminey christmas!!