Moderator: Andrew
Aaron wrote:How are the boys these day on tour? Are they still a half step down?
Aaron wrote:How are the boys these day on tour? Are they still a half step down?
strangegrey wrote:I think it's odd that they would bounce back and forth between tuning down and concert pitch. Hell, the guitar and piano techs would go fucking nuts trying to re-intonate and re-tune the instruments.
There aren't many folks out there that can tell the difference from sitting in the audience, unless they have an ipod handy to reference standard pitch against what they're playing at...
I think it's a senseless thing to fixate on. Tuning down will save arnel's voice and prolong his tenure with the band a bit...so it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Hell, when Perry did his 94 tour, they tuned down...and did so without the usenet groups hawking on about it....
steveo777 wrote:Maybe if they had tuned down when Steve Augeri was with them, he might still be there. All scandals aside, I think this problem with SA really shook them up and got them to see that some changes needed to be made or they would face a certain string of yet more singers. I don't think the fans could take much more change. So if tuning down a bit keeps them intact for some years more, I'm all for it.
strangegrey wrote:steveo777 wrote:Maybe if they had tuned down when Steve Augeri was with them, he might still be there. All scandals aside, I think this problem with SA really shook them up and got them to see that some changes needed to be made or they would face a certain string of yet more singers. I don't think the fans could take much more change. So if tuning down a bit keeps them intact for some years more, I'm all for it.
Who knows!! Hard to speculate on the 'what ifs'...I remember a few years ago, commenting that they were going at it hard with Augeri for a while...and that what really would have helped was a break. I remember looking at the tour itineraries of Journey during the departure-frontiers era and marveling at how many more performances they did with augeri during the same period...and Perry himself broke down and burned out. So it's hard to suggest that it would have been any different, regardless of the key.
I can speak from experience, that dropping a half a step has done wonders in the bands I was in. The 'part-time' singers like myself were able to sing more comfortably without feeling like we needed to fight, just to sing the songs. Granted, that would be a factor of insignificance to a seasoned singer...however, what was significant was the wear and tear to a voice, for someone singing full-time. Every singer in my cover band situations would marvel about how much less tear they got when we played a half a step down. One guy was a real whack job...he had this very disgusting concoction of herbal tea mixed with honey, vinegar and salt. (I would go "that's not vocal preparation, that's oral douching!" LOL)...regardless, when we switched to 1/2 step down, he stopped using the tea...claiming that he no longer needed to. He would be able to sing 3 hours a night and feel comfortable he could do it 2-3 times a week without taking extra measures....
Anyone that's a singer will comment that this catalog is one of the hardest catalogs to sing out there, period. There's more vocal acrobatics in one Journey song than 5/6 of most current artist's catalogs. So to that end, be it Arnel, Augeri, Perry...I think that the aggregate benefit of singing in a lower key is obvious....I remember reading how JSS felt it didn't work for him. So there's some artist interpretation here...
Perhaps the reason they are going 1/2 step down now, is a factor of Arnel than a factor of the rest of the band saying Arnel should do it. Referring back to my above comments about doing this in my own cover band, perhaps Arnel did it in the Zoo enough for Arnel to feel more comfortable doing it with Journey.
G.I.Jim wrote:Aaron wrote:How are the boys these day on tour? Are they still a half step down?
It seems to vary from show to show. Maybe they just see how Arnel feels on any given night, and just accomidate his vocals? I don't know, but I can't think of any other reason.
strangegrey wrote:steveo777 wrote:Maybe if they had tuned down when Steve Augeri was with them, he might still be there. All scandals aside, I think this problem with SA really shook them up and got them to see that some changes needed to be made or they would face a certain string of yet more singers. I don't think the fans could take much more change. So if tuning down a bit keeps them intact for some years more, I'm all for it.
Who knows!! Hard to speculate on the 'what ifs'...I remember a few years ago, commenting that they were going at it hard with Augeri for a while...and that what really would have helped was a break. I remember looking at the tour itineraries of Journey during the departure-frontiers era and marveling at how many more performances they did with augeri during the same period...and Perry himself broke down and burned out. So it's hard to suggest that it would have been any different, regardless of the key.
I can speak from experience, that dropping a half a step has done wonders in the bands I was in. The 'part-time' singers like myself were able to sing more comfortably without feeling like we needed to fight, just to sing the songs. Granted, that would be a factor of insignificance to a seasoned singer...however, what was significant was the wear and tear to a voice, for someone singing full-time. Every singer in my cover band situations would marvel about how much less tear they got when we played a half a step down. One guy was a real whack job...he had this very disgusting concoction of herbal tea mixed with honey, vinegar and salt. (I would go "that's not vocal preparation, that's oral douching!" LOL)...regardless, when we switched to 1/2 step down, he stopped using the tea...claiming that he no longer needed to. He would be able to sing 3 hours a night and feel comfortable he could do it 2-3 times a week without taking extra measures....
Anyone that's a singer will comment that this catalog is one of the hardest catalogs to sing out there, period. There's more vocal acrobatics in one Journey song than 5/6 of most current artist's catalogs. So to that end, be it Arnel, Augeri, Perry...I think that the aggregate benefit of singing in a lower key is obvious....I remember reading how JSS felt it didn't work for him. So there's some artist interpretation here...
Perhaps the reason they are going 1/2 step down now, is a factor of Arnel than a factor of the rest of the band saying Arnel should do it. Referring back to my above comments about doing this in my own cover band, perhaps Arnel did it in the Zoo enough for Arnel to feel more comfortable doing it with Journey.
steveo777 wrote:Maybe if they had tuned down when Steve Augeri was with them, he might still be there. All scandals aside, I think this problem with SA really shook them up and got them to see that some changes needed to be made or they would face a certain string of yet more singers. I don't think the fans could take much more change. So if tuning down a bit keeps them intact for some years more, I'm all for it.
strangegrey wrote:I think it's odd that they would bounce back and forth between tuning down and concert pitch. Hell, the guitar and piano techs would go fucking nuts trying to re-intonate and re-tune the instruments.
There aren't many folks out there that can tell the difference from sitting in the audience, unless they have an ipod handy to reference standard pitch against what they're playing at...
I think it's a senseless thing to fixate on. Tuning down will save arnel's voice and prolong his tenure with the band a bit...so it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Hell, when Perry did his 94 tour, they tuned down...and did so without the usenet groups hawking on about it....
RossValoryRocks wrote:strangegrey wrote:I think it's odd that they would bounce back and forth between tuning down and concert pitch. Hell, the guitar and piano techs would go fucking nuts trying to re-intonate and re-tune the instruments.
There aren't many folks out there that can tell the difference from sitting in the audience, unless they have an ipod handy to reference standard pitch against what they're playing at...
I think it's a senseless thing to fixate on. Tuning down will save arnel's voice and prolong his tenure with the band a bit...so it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Hell, when Perry did his 94 tour, they tuned down...and did so without the usenet groups hawking on about it....
Frank bro...they don't have to tune the instruments down to "detune". The notes are already there. They would just have to play them differently.
Of course...they could tune the guitar down as you say, but why would they?
Rick wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:strangegrey wrote:I think it's odd that they would bounce back and forth between tuning down and concert pitch. Hell, the guitar and piano techs would go fucking nuts trying to re-intonate and re-tune the instruments.
There aren't many folks out there that can tell the difference from sitting in the audience, unless they have an ipod handy to reference standard pitch against what they're playing at...
I think it's a senseless thing to fixate on. Tuning down will save arnel's voice and prolong his tenure with the band a bit...so it's a worthwhile endeavor.
Hell, when Perry did his 94 tour, they tuned down...and did so without the usenet groups hawking on about it....
Frank bro...they don't have to tune the instruments down to "detune". The notes are already there. They would just have to play them differently.
Of course...they could tune the guitar down as you say, but why would they?
They do tune down, because it's far easier to play the instruments tuned down, then trying to figure out the other chord progressions. They would make mistakes, being used to playing them the same way for, what is it, 56 year now?
Jana wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:Aaron wrote:How are the boys these day on tour? Are they still a half step down?
It seems to vary from show to show. Maybe they just see how Arnel feels on any given night, and just accomidate his vocals? I don't know, but I can't think of any other reason.
I don't think it has varied. I think the DVD Manila show this year was the only non-tuned down show. The rest of the spring tour and European tour and U.S. tour has been tuned-down a half step from what I understand. I'm not a hundred percent on it.
WalrusOct9 wrote:um....guitars HAVE To be retuned. Guitar riffs with open chords (which, at some point involves almost every Journey song ever) can't be properly transposed. You can't play "Stone In Love" any other way besides open G, D, and C shapes.
I think the piano is actually some kind of electric keyboard, so it's just a matter of pressing a transpose button somewhere, or some MIDI device being involved to move the keyboards down 1/2 step.
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Frank bro...they don't have to tune the instruments down to "detune". The notes are already there. They would just have to play them differently.
Of course...they could tune the guitar down as you say, but why would they?
strangegrey wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:
Frank bro...they don't have to tune the instruments down to "detune". The notes are already there. They would just have to play them differently.
Of course...they could tune the guitar down as you say, but why would they?
So really, it's better to just retune the guitar for E flat.
Some other issues come into play with tuning down for guitar...things like string tension (which can be masked slightly with heavier strings) adjusting Neal's Floyd Rose, neck relief and intonation....so it may take more than 2 minutes to get a guitar prepped for playing lower.
Granted, most major rock show techs will restring guitars each day. When I met Neal's tech back in 2001, he indicated that Neal's strings were getting changed with such frequency. When you change strings, you do a quick check of intonation, setup, etc...So really, it's going to happen anyway. Tuning down to the lower pitch is, at that point, a switch on the peterson tuner.
All of this pales in comparison to the adjustment a singer has to make with his instrument when going from one step to another!All a guitarist, bassist or piano player needs to do is retune the instrument and play the same notes...a singer actually has to sing higher or lower...
sonorstks wrote:
So this is tuned down a 1/2 step. My ears must be bad. Sounds pretty spot on to me...Anyone???
madsplash wrote:sonorstks wrote:
So this is tuned down a 1/2 step. My ears must be bad. Sounds pretty spot on to me...Anyone???
Why would they play in a lower key with Deen? He doesn't sing much and doesn't need them to, to save his voice.
texafana wrote:Neal's sound is more bluesy rock than ever before and tuning a half step down actually gives the guitar a slightly more robust low end sound. Alot of you have posted comments about Neal's recent (past year or so) kick ass guitar sound, and detuning a half step down has probably contributed to this.
Ehwmatt wrote:If they were tuning down any farther than a half step it'd be more complicated, and the Floyd might need to be adjusted initially, a good point I didn't think of since I've never owned a Floyd for longer than a month (prefer "vintage" tremolos so much more), but a mere half step down on a good guitar probably wouldn't require too much fuckin around with the set up past tuning it, especially since there's new strings every gig. I have no problems with intonation/pitch etc. when tuning down half a step with newer strings on a well set-up guitar like my Lukather or my American Strat.
Plus all that's moot, Neal's got plenty of guitars, they could keep half of them in E standard and half in E flat or whatever if they really wanted to make a "game time" tuning decision. Probably just more of a mess than they care to deal with... esp if the Whale needs to be tuned.
Aaron wrote:Folks,
Thanks for the updates. It looks like they are still down a half step. I find it interesting that the only gig they do in the original key is the one being recorded. That in itself says the band is concerned about the issue. As already stated, the guitars will need to be detuned to be able to play the tunes properly. There's no need to rehash this.
Given the all of the hoopla with Arnel being the new singer has passed, I wanted to give Journey a fresh listen. I got my chance today to hear them on Palladia this afternoon. I only got to hear AWYWI but it didn't take much time to develop an opinion. The song was down a half step and it was obvious. The song lost it's happy bright feeling turning it more melancholy and angry. And after listening to it, Arnel is just not that extraordinary. He sounded ok but not that great. His pronunciation issue was more obvious than I remembered as well.
I can see detuning for Perry but for a replacement singer, I don't think so. Journey has based it's history on feel good, up beat songs. They're songs don't convey the same message being detuned. I was rethinking going to see them at Indy this month. I'm sticking with my original decision of staying home this year, the first time since 1998.
Cheers,
Aaron
steveo777 wrote: I know this is just speculative since nobody has heard Steve sing in a long, long time, but there is no way in freaking hell he could pull off a tour like this anymore, IMO.
steveo777 wrote:Aaron wrote:Folks,
Thanks for the updates. It looks like they are still down a half step. I find it interesting that the only gig they do in the original key is the one being recorded. That in itself says the band is concerned about the issue. As already stated, the guitars will need to be detuned to be able to play the tunes properly. There's no need to rehash this.
Given the all of the hoopla with Arnel being the new singer has passed, I wanted to give Journey a fresh listen. I got my chance today to hear them on Palladia this afternoon. I only got to hear AWYWI but it didn't take much time to develop an opinion. The song was down a half step and it was obvious. The song lost it's happy bright feeling turning it more melancholy and angry. And after listening to it, Arnel is just not that extraordinary. He sounded ok but not that great. His pronunciation issue was more obvious than I remembered as well.
I can see detuning for Perry but for a replacement singer, I don't think so. Journey has based it's history on feel good, up beat songs. They're songs don't convey the same message being detuned. I was rethinking going to see them at Indy this month. I'm sticking with my original decision of staying home this year, the first time since 1998.
Cheers,
Aaron
Not to rehash the issue, but nobody, probably, nobody can run that tour schedule with that catalog and have their voice hold up over the long term, in original key. The fact that there are not many singers who can handle the Journey book makes it pretty slim pickins for any replacement singers beyond Perry. I know this is just speculative since nobody has heard Steve sing in a long, long time, but there is no way in freaking hell he could pull off a tour like this anymore, IMO.
steveo777 wrote:Aaron wrote:Folks,
Thanks for the updates. It looks like they are still down a half step. I find it interesting that the only gig they do in the original key is the one being recorded. That in itself says the band is concerned about the issue. As already stated, the guitars will need to be detuned to be able to play the tunes properly. There's no need to rehash this.
Given the all of the hoopla with Arnel being the new singer has passed, I wanted to give Journey a fresh listen. I got my chance today to hear them on Palladia this afternoon. I only got to hear AWYWI but it didn't take much time to develop an opinion. The song was down a half step and it was obvious. The song lost it's happy bright feeling turning it more melancholy and angry. And after listening to it, Arnel is just not that extraordinary. He sounded ok but not that great. His pronunciation issue was more obvious than I remembered as well.
I can see detuning for Perry but for a replacement singer, I don't think so. Journey has based it's history on feel good, up beat songs. They're songs don't convey the same message being detuned. I was rethinking going to see them at Indy this month. I'm sticking with my original decision of staying home this year, the first time since 1998.
Cheers,
Aaron
Not to rehash the issue, but nobody, probably, nobody can run that tour schedule with that catalog and have their voice hold up over the long term, in original key. The fact that there are not many singers who can handle the Journey book makes it pretty slim pickins for any replacement singers beyond Perry. I know this is just speculative since nobody has heard Steve sing in a long, long time, but there is no way in freaking hell he could pull off a tour like this anymore, IMO.
I agree with Gunbot on this; tuning down is not the answer, they need to seriously cut back on the number of gigs they are playing and schedule more off time. Much more than a couple gigs a week and they'll burn Arnel up before half of next season is up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests