Fact Finder wrote:
oooohhhhh!!!!

Interesting dichotomy, huh?

Moderator: Andrew
Lula wrote:thanks for sharing your experiences, donna. i did not want to type out the personal experiences i've had with insurance not covering something because the end results have been significant losses in my life. sometimes i'd rather not get into debate when it's too personal of an experience to make my point. i went with "suckie" lol.
Gibby wrote:One term and done. America is finally sitting up and paying attention - the novelty has worn off.
Tito wrote:Not to get off topic, but did anybody see Obama on NASCAR Channel? Did anybody buy his "knowledge" of NASCAR? Totally fake and bullshit.
Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
oooohhhhh!!!!![]()
Interesting dichotomy, huh?
oh duh![]()
so you see the importance of government staying out of personal decisions concerning our bodies, about time.
Rockindeano wrote:Tito wrote:Not to get off topic, but did anybody see Obama on NASCAR Channel? Did anybody buy his "knowledge" of NASCAR? Totally fake and bullshit.
And I suppose yours is impeccable? You stupid fucker couldn't comment on the sport if your life depended on it. What the Hell is Obama supposed to do, not have the Chase drivers visit? You think Bush had a clue on the Red Wings visit?
As for your knowledge, I bet you couldn't name the top 12 Chasers, let alone describe the format of the Chase. Hell, you have Chicagoland there in Chicago and I bet you didn't even go to the race.
I cannot wait until some sort of legislation gets passed through on Health Care. I will be here all day to rub all of your faces in it.
And before any of you say it's wrong to "push it through" or "ram it through," go fuck yourselves. As if it wasn't bad enough your party brought us national election fraud in 2000 and 2004, it is now being revealed that Tom Ridge, Bush 43's Sec of Homeland Security, has said they raised the alert level fraudulently, based on well, fraud, in order to keep the focus on terror, thus keeping that stupid sonofabitch Bush in office.
So before you Cons get your pussies all wet over the not so probability of a Con take over of the House in 2010, the corruption just keeps coming in waves. Imagine that, more Bush Admin corruptness.
donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
oooohhhhh!!!!![]()
Interesting dichotomy, huh?
oh duh![]()
so you see the importance of government staying out of personal decisions concerning our bodies, about time.
Actually what I see is the hypocrisy that I have known was there all along.
Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
No dear, what I'm saying is that it's hypocritical to say "my body my choice" when talking about abortion, yet pushing a health care reform package that will potentially limit the amount of "choice" a person will have to receive health services, simply based on age or other limiting factors. Will granny be able to say "my body my choice" when she's a hundred years old and needs a pacemaker, or will be she forced to suffer and 'take that pill' because the government tells her she's no longer a useful member of society. Who are they to decide that???
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:donnaplease wrote:Fact Finder wrote:
oooohhhhh!!!!![]()
Interesting dichotomy, huh?
oh duh![]()
so you see the importance of government staying out of personal decisions concerning our bodies, about time.
Actually what I see is the hypocrisy that I have known was there all along.
What, the Feds protecting the rights of a woman to chose? Let me guess, you are trying to imply that Govt will make decisions for you once the Overhaul happens?
Try for once to not to listen to Fox News or Limbaugh. The Govt will not decide anything for you, including which plan to chose. scare tactics my friend, scare tactics.
You religious wackos are the ones who want Roe v Wade overturned, basically saying you want Govt to decide no on abortion.
Yep, I see a hypocrisy alright. As long as it's lock step with your beliefs, then yeah, the Govt should step in.![]()
donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
No dear, what I'm saying is that it's hypocritical to say "my body my choice" when talking about abortion, yet pushing a health care reform package that will potentially limit the amount of "choice" a person will have to receive health services, simply based on age or other limiting factors. Will granny be able to say "my body my choice" when she's a hundred years old and needs a pacemaker, or will be she forced to suffer and 'take that pill' because the government tells her she's no longer a useful member of society. Who are they to decide that???
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
No dear, what I'm saying is that it's hypocritical to say "my body my choice" when talking about abortion, yet pushing a health care reform package that will potentially limit the amount of "choice" a person will have to receive health services, simply based on age or other limiting factors. Will granny be able to say "my body my choice" when she's a hundred years old and needs a pacemaker, or will be she forced to suffer and 'take that pill' because the government tells her she's no longer a useful member of society. Who are they to decide that???
Please prove your argument. I mean, really prove it- cite a source, not some typical right wing hot air.
Obama's plan will not, I repeat will not force you to have the US Govt take care of you. They have maintained all along, that you can keep your private care if you so desire.
Please prove us "Libs" wrong.
donnaplease wrote:Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
No dear, what I'm saying is that it's hypocritical to say "my body my choice" when talking about abortion, yet pushing a health care reform package that will potentially limit the amount of "choice" a person will have to receive health services, simply based on age or other limiting factors. Will granny be able to say "my body my choice" when she's a hundred years old and needs a pacemaker, or will be she forced to suffer and 'take that pill' because the government tells her she's no longer a useful member of society. Who are they to decide that???
Please prove your argument. I mean, really prove it- cite a source, not some typical right wing hot air.
Obama's plan will not, I repeat will not force you to have the US Govt take care of you. They have maintained all along, that you can keep your private care if you so desire.
Please prove us "Libs" wrong.
You prove it.
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:Lula wrote:you're saying ff is a hypocrite? or being pro choice is hypocritical? i'm confused
No dear, what I'm saying is that it's hypocritical to say "my body my choice" when talking about abortion, yet pushing a health care reform package that will potentially limit the amount of "choice" a person will have to receive health services, simply based on age or other limiting factors. Will granny be able to say "my body my choice" when she's a hundred years old and needs a pacemaker, or will be she forced to suffer and 'take that pill' because the government tells her she's no longer a useful member of society. Who are they to decide that???
Please prove your argument. I mean, really prove it- cite a source, not some typical right wing hot air.
Obama's plan will not, I repeat will not force you to have the US Govt take care of you. They have maintained all along, that you can keep your private care if you so desire.
Please prove us "Libs" wrong.
Rockindeano wrote:Tito wrote:Not to get off topic, but did anybody see Obama on NASCAR Channel? Did anybody buy his "knowledge" of NASCAR? Totally fake and bullshit.
And I suppose yours is impeccable? You stupid fucker couldn't comment on the sport if your life depended on it. What the Hell is Obama supposed to do, not have the Chase drivers visit? You think Bush had a clue on the Red Wings visit?
As for your knowledge, I bet you couldn't name the top 12 Chasers, let alone describe the format of the Chase. Hell, you have Chicagoland there in Chicago and I bet you didn't even go to the race.
I cannot wait until some sort of legislation gets passed through on Health Care. I will be here all day to rub all of your faces in it.
And before any of you say it's wrong to "push it through" or "ram it through," go fuck yourselves. As if it wasn't bad enough your party brought us national election fraud in 2000 and 2004, it is now being revealed that Tom Ridge, Bush 43's Sec of Homeland Security, has said they raised the alert level fraudulently, based on well, fraud, in order to keep the focus on terror, thus keeping that stupid sonofabitch Bush in office.
So before you Cons get your pussies all wet over the not so probability of a Con take over of the House in 2010, the corruption just keeps coming in waves. Imagine that, more Bush Admin corruptness.
treetopovskaya wrote:yeah... free to choose your health plan until you lose it or change it. whatever.
Eric wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Tito wrote:Not to get off topic, but did anybody see Obama on NASCAR Channel? Did anybody buy his "knowledge" of NASCAR? Totally fake and bullshit.
And I suppose yours is impeccable? You stupid fucker couldn't comment on the sport if your life depended on it. What the Hell is Obama supposed to do, not have the Chase drivers visit? You think Bush had a clue on the Red Wings visit?
As for your knowledge, I bet you couldn't name the top 12 Chasers, let alone describe the format of the Chase. Hell, you have Chicagoland there in Chicago and I bet you didn't even go to the race.
I cannot wait until some sort of legislation gets passed through on Health Care. I will be here all day to rub all of your faces in it.
And before any of you say it's wrong to "push it through" or "ram it through," go fuck yourselves. As if it wasn't bad enough your party brought us national election fraud in 2000 and 2004, it is now being revealed that Tom Ridge, Bush 43's Sec of Homeland Security, has said they raised the alert level fraudulently, based on well, fraud, in order to keep the focus on terror, thus keeping that stupid sonofabitch Bush in office.
So before you Cons get your pussies all wet over the not so probability of a Con take over of the House in 2010, the corruption just keeps coming in waves. Imagine that, more Bush Admin corruptness.
What fraud? You mean Acorn in 2008? Or that your VP candidate in 2000 might be headed to jail?
treetopovskaya wrote:obama says...
“It is a core ethical and moral obligation that we look after each other. In wealthiest nation on earth, we are neglecting to live up to that call.”
pretty words. where is the ethical & moral obligation when it concerns an unborn child?
treetopovskaya wrote:obama says...
“It is a core ethical and moral obligation that we look after each other. In wealthiest nation on earth, we are neglecting to live up to that call.”
pretty words. where is the ethical & moral obligation when it concerns an unborn child?
donnaplease wrote:treetopovskaya wrote:obama says...
“It is a core ethical and moral obligation that we look after each other. In wealthiest nation on earth, we are neglecting to live up to that call.”
pretty words. where is the ethical & moral obligation when it concerns an unborn child?
Did you hear all the biblical references he used when talking to the thousands of religious leaders via teleconference? Pitiful.I bet if that woulda been GWB the ACLU would've already filed suit claiming breach of separation of church & state.
I swear I don't think there's any lengths he won't go to in trying to get his way. I wonder how many faces he truly has...
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:treetopovskaya wrote:obama says...
“It is a core ethical and moral obligation that we look after each other. In wealthiest nation on earth, we are neglecting to live up to that call.”
pretty words. where is the ethical & moral obligation when it concerns an unborn child?
Did you hear all the biblical references he used when talking to the thousands of religious leaders via teleconference? Pitiful.I bet if that woulda been GWB the ACLU would've already filed suit claiming breach of separation of church & state.
I swear I don't think there's any lengths he won't go to in trying to get his way. I wonder how many faces he truly has...
And now what is your problem with Obama's faith values? You do the man is a Christian right? The difference is Obama doesn't go into a closet and dial up God on a hotline like W did. W was brainless, clueless.
Saint John wrote:I'm gonna start going up to newly pregnant pro-choice women and kicking them as hard as I can in the stomach repeatedly. If it isn't murder when they do it, then it isn't when I do it.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests