Fact Finder wrote:Oops, make the 70 yards in penalties for the Ravens.
Ocho just got too greedy on that fumble, could be a game turner. You could just see it coming when he didn't tuck the ball and tried to stiff arm Reed
Moderator: Andrew
Fact Finder wrote:Oops, make the 70 yards in penalties for the Ravens.
Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Never mind, choked missed FG. That was huge
No shit. Too close for comfort. After that great start the Bengals have looked flat. Lets see if they can hold on. Big first down here depending on the challenge.
Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Never mind, choked missed FG. That was huge
No shit. Too close for comfort. After that great start the Bengals have looked flat. Lets see if they can hold on. Big first down here depending on the challenge.
After that overturned Ochocinco reception they seemed to lose a lot of momentum. I don't really think he got the first down there, but it might be hard to determine clear/irrefutable proof he didn't here on the video.
It seems the Bengals will take this one but man what an ugly second half. Actually a bad three quarters. I'll take this win though.
4-0 in the division and now on to the Stealers next week. 6-2 overall, the best Bengals start since Superbowl year 1988.
Ehwmatt wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Never mind, choked missed FG. That was huge
No shit. Too close for comfort. After that great start the Bengals have looked flat. Lets see if they can hold on. Big first down here depending on the challenge.
After that overturned Ochocinco reception they seemed to lose a lot of momentum. I don't really think he got the first down there, but it might be hard to determine clear/irrefutable proof he didn't here on the video.
It seems the Bengals will take this one but man what an ugly second half. Actually a bad three quarters. I'll take this win though.
4-0 in the division and now on to the Stealers next week. 6-2 overall, the best Bengals start since Superbowl year 1988.
They are lookin good. Flacco is proving to be just what I've always thought - mediocre! I've NEVER gotten the hype about him
Enigma869 wrote:Nice job by the Packers getting their asses handed to them by a previously winless Tampa team! Also, New Orleans is not off to a great start, but with Brees' arm, I'm confident that they'll mount a comeback!
Fact Finder wrote:Not quite. We have to go at Minn, at Chargers and at Jets. Not to mention at Oakland. 2 West Coast trips.
Enigma869 wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Not quite. We have to go at Minn, at Chargers and at Jets. Not to mention at Oakland. 2 West Coast trips.
You might not want to mention Oakland's name when trying to argue against a "weak schedule"! You'd be far better off removing their name and replacing it with Pittsburgh...the team they have to play next week! That said, the Bengals also play Detroit, Cleveland, and Kansas City, along with Oakland. Those are pretty much 4 automatic wins by just showing up!
Ehwmatt wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Fact Finder wrote:Not quite. We have to go at Minn, at Chargers and at Jets. Not to mention at Oakland. 2 West Coast trips.
You might not want to mention Oakland's name when trying to argue against a "weak schedule"! You'd be far better off removing their name and replacing it with Pittsburgh...the team they have to play next week! That said, the Bengals also play Detroit, Cleveland, and Kansas City, along with Oakland. Those are pretty much 4 automatic wins by just showing up!
I THINK he was just saying since it was a west coast trip it's not automatic... not trying to say the Raiders present a tough game on paper.
Plus, you never know. I think Chris Henry could be a pretty big loss for their offense.
Fact Finder wrote:The only good thing the Bengals ever did on the West Coast was break Bo Jacksons hip.
I'm kidding about that.
Edit: add Victoria C from Seattle..
YoungJRNY wrote:Fact Finder wrote:The only good thing the Bengals ever did on the West Coast was break Bo Jacksons hip.
I'm kidding about that.
Edit: add Victoria C from Seattle..
The only good thing the Bengals ever did was practically nothing.
Fact Finder wrote:The only good thing the Bengals ever did on the West Coast was break Bo Jacksons hip.
Enigma869 wrote:Fact Finder wrote:The only good thing the Bengals ever did on the West Coast was break Bo Jacksons hip.
Bo Jackson was a fucking BEAST! It's really unfortunate that he was never healthy, because he had the potential to be one of the all time greats. He was the most unique back I ever saw come into the NFL.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Fact Finder wrote:The only good thing the Bengals ever did on the West Coast was break Bo Jacksons hip.
Bo Jackson was a fucking BEAST! It's really unfortunate that he was never healthy, because he had the potential to be one of the all time greats. He was the most unique back I ever saw come into the NFL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjO_QfFYV78
lights1961 wrote:WOW My Packers giving one to the Bucs???? DANG... it will be a very long 2nd half... with the Cowboys this week, the morale at its lowest of the year.... I dont see how they win too many more games... very weak defense and bad offensive line... no special teams coverage.... no coaching... no game breakers. The board up in GB needs to fire Ted Thompson... then fire McCarthy especially if they have another 6-10 year... OH and the 3-4 defense IS NOT WORKING... maybe its time to change back... Kampman is not a coverage guy... he gets beat everytime. Horrible, horrible...
Ehwmatt wrote:lights1961 wrote:WOW My Packers giving one to the Bucs???? DANG... it will be a very long 2nd half... with the Cowboys this week, the morale at its lowest of the year.... I dont see how they win too many more games... very weak defense and bad offensive line... no special teams coverage.... no coaching... no game breakers. The board up in GB needs to fire Ted Thompson... then fire McCarthy especially if they have another 6-10 year... OH and the 3-4 defense IS NOT WORKING... maybe its time to change back... Kampman is not a coverage guy... he gets beat everytime. Horrible, horrible...
I really thought things were gonna turn out better for you guys after that heroic victory over the Bears in week 1. But that was also back when we thought the Bears were gonna be contenders.
lights1961 wrote:WOW My Packers giving one to the Bucs???? DANG... it will be a very long 2nd half... with the Cowboys this week, the morale at its lowest of the year.... I dont see how they win too many more games... very weak defense and bad offensive line... no special teams coverage.... no coaching... no game breakers. The board up in GB needs to fire Ted Thompson... then fire McCarthy especially if they have another 6-10 year... OH and the 3-4 defense IS NOT WORKING... maybe its time to change back... Kampman is not a coverage guy... he gets beat everytime. Horrible, horrible...
YoungJRNY wrote:lights1961 wrote:WOW My Packers giving one to the Bucs???? DANG... it will be a very long 2nd half... with the Cowboys this week, the morale at its lowest of the year.... I dont see how they win too many more games... very weak defense and bad offensive line... no special teams coverage.... no coaching... no game breakers. The board up in GB needs to fire Ted Thompson... then fire McCarthy especially if they have another 6-10 year... OH and the 3-4 defense IS NOT WORKING... maybe its time to change back... Kampman is not a coverage guy... he gets beat everytime. Horrible, horrible...
You just can't interchange your defense in the middle of the season! The Packers, at times, showed what the 3-4 defense can do, and that's packages that comes from blitzing that 4th man from any point of the field. You can't just switch back to a base 4-3 with 3-4 talent plugged into the personal. If the Packers draft right and stick to the 3-4 defense, then they will get better. It takes time for it to come together. This is their first year running the 3-4 defense so they are learning. It'll be a learning curve and they still have some guys that don't fit a 3-4 criteria. Give it time my man. (Denver also switched to a 3-4 this year, and are atop the league in total defense.)
As far as the Pack as a team, they might want to think about protecting Aaron Rodgers before they do ANYTHING because he's a damn good talent who has the arm to take them down field. Unfortunately, his linemen are killing their moral on offense, and that limits Rodgers ability as a whole.
lights1961 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:lights1961 wrote:WOW My Packers giving one to the Bucs???? DANG... it will be a very long 2nd half... with the Cowboys this week, the morale at its lowest of the year.... I dont see how they win too many more games... very weak defense and bad offensive line... no special teams coverage.... no coaching... no game breakers. The board up in GB needs to fire Ted Thompson... then fire McCarthy especially if they have another 6-10 year... OH and the 3-4 defense IS NOT WORKING... maybe its time to change back... Kampman is not a coverage guy... he gets beat everytime. Horrible, horrible...
You just can't interchange your defense in the middle of the season! The Packers, at times, showed what the 3-4 defense can do, and that's packages that comes from blitzing that 4th man from any point of the field. You can't just switch back to a base 4-3 with 3-4 talent plugged into the personal. If the Packers draft right and stick to the 3-4 defense, then they will get better. It takes time for it to come together. This is their first year running the 3-4 defense so they are learning. It'll be a learning curve and they still have some guys that don't fit a 3-4 criteria. Give it time my man. (Denver also switched to a 3-4 this year, and are atop the league in total defense.)
As far as the Pack as a team, they might want to think about protecting Aaron Rodgers before they do ANYTHING because he's a damn good talent who has the arm to take them down field. Unfortunately, his linemen are killing their moral on offense, and that limits Rodgers ability as a whole.
Its weird with Aaraon, because he is a great talent... and if he ever gets protection... and a line that can block... watch out. I feel like the team has gone backwards right now to 1993-and 1994 when Brett first came to start... he had no line either then and was sacked a lot... but the coaches kept with him all through out those rough learning days... same can be done here... defense just doesnt have the speed to stop the pass....which is difficult to watch...
R
Fact Finder wrote:End of 1st. Denver 3-0 over the Stealers. I'm happy. Let's go Denver!
Fact Finder wrote:End of 1st. Denver 3-0 over the Stealers. I'm happy. Let's go Denver!
Ehwmatt wrote:The commentating on MNF is so much better than the Sunday games it's almost sick. Gruden is the man
Enigma869 wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:The commentating on MNF is so much better than the Sunday games it's almost sick. Gruden is the man
Dude...you haven't heard bad commentating until you listen to that Today Show reject Bryant Gumbel do a game on the NFL Network. That guy is fucking ATROCIOUS! Hopefully, the NFL Network has received enough hate mail in the off-season and he isn't back in the booth when the Thursday night schedule kicks off this week!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests