The Food Thread

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby DrFU » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:19 am

Duncan wrote:
DrFU wrote:
Duncan wrote:
DrFU wrote:
Jana wrote:It's so nice to have Phyls back (after her sabbatical at the Buddhist retreat). :D :D :D :D


Must have been reading MR on the iPhone during the session on non-attachment ...

Cliff's Note's version: the path out of suffering lies in LETTING THINGS GO ... the tighter you cling to perceived wrongs, the more external validation you seek from others, the more score-keeping you engage in, the more you try to control the behavior of others, the more YOU suffer.


Linda - if you'll pardon the expression - nice puppies!


hehehe ... thanks; that's Drake and Shelby and the armchair physiologist out enjoying our first decent spring day :D


Let me guess - Shelby is the brown one and Drake the black one?


Other way around
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby DrFU » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:21 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
Thenightbull wrote:cause i've got too be free...................


Dude, you have entirely too much time on your hands. I think you need a full time job!!! :wink:


as opposed to you?? :lol:


No shit Cyberfuckinprick!!, not you, Lynn!! :D :wink:


according to my (serious gamer) sons, the term is e-peen ... :lol:
DrFU
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3272
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:43 pm

Postby Don » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:24 am

Behshad wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Blueskies wrote:I think you quickly forgot about the looooooonnnnnggggggg post you made on the previous page where you claimed you didn't participate in this kind of behavior^ and didn't embroil yourself in "drama" :lol: :roll:


And you quickly forgot where I said I don't bother with it until people give me a reason. Sitting there in judgement of what I write and how I speak (and exaggerating, btw), and calling me out about it 3 different times was about enough. As you yourself said, unless you know the person you don't know their tone, or whatever it was you rambled on about, and you certainly don't know me, but you get to sit there and call me "fowl" mouthed and "one of the guys".. piss off. As YOU keep saying "If you get to do it, so do I..." So there, you get to take shots "at me and many others", then you're gonna get it back from "me and many others", baby. That's how me and many others roll. 8)


Thats how you roll? :lol: :lol:

Baby??? SWEET! But sorry, I don't go for chicks. I'm fully hetero. 8)

By the way, the thread has moved on, don't dwell. :lol: :lol:


did you SERIOUSLY just tell me "don't dwell"? Commenting on something you said one page ago is hardly dwelling.

you spending 15 pages yelling about stuff that happened 2-3 years ago - that's dwelling.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: .

So moving on....


lol, Kim with the routine 6-4-3 double play. Ah, spring is in bloom.


Duuuuude,,,, Such a nice day here today,,, right now its 62 but feels like 72 ,,, not a single cloud in the sky,,,, Too bad I just got rid of my convertible,,,, :?

Image


86 with a bit of a warm breeze.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:26 am

Gunbot wrote:
86 with a bit of a warm breeze.


The girls all got their summer clothes on...man, it might as well be July 16th today. 84 degrees, perfect. All those fuckers in the northeast are flooded in with dreary weather...lol, asswarts.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:30 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
86 with a bit of a warm breeze.


The girls all got their summer clothes on...man, it might as well be July 16th today. 84 degrees, perfect. All those fuckers in the northeast are flooded in with dreary weather...lol, asswarts.




Not really it was beautiful here today for Maine in March...almost 60.....not 84 but still nice! 8)
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:14 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
Thenightbull wrote:cause i've got too be free...................


Dude, you have entirely too much time on your hands. I think you need a full time job!!! :wink:


as opposed to you?? :lol:


No shit Cyberfuckinprick!!, not you, Lynn!! :D :wink:


I must say, I do appreciate some of the heavyweight language coming the XXs around here... at least I know I'm the only alleged fowl one around here. Pleasure to be in such good company ladies. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:20 am

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

The relative severity of various British profanities, as perceived by the public, was studied on behalf of the British Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, BBC and Advertising Standards Authority; the results of this jointly commissioned research were published in December 2000 in a paper called "Delete Expletives". It listed the profanities in order of decreasing severity, the top ten being ****, motherfucker, fuck, wanker, nigger, bastard, prick, bollocks, arsehole, and paki in that order. About 83% of respondents regarded **** as "very severe"; 16% thought the same about shit and 10% about crap. Only about 1% thought **** was "not swearing"; 9% thought the same about shit and 32% of crap.


I just figured out ths place has a language filter. :shock:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:25 am

steveo777 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

The relative severity of various British profanities, as perceived by the public, was studied on behalf of the British Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, BBC and Advertising Standards Authority; the results of this jointly commissioned research were published in December 2000 in a paper called "Delete Expletives". It listed the profanities in order of decreasing severity, the top ten being ****, motherfucker, fuck, wanker, nigger, bastard, prick, bollocks, arsehole, and paki in that order. About 83% of respondents regarded **** as "very severe"; 16% thought the same about shit and 10% about crap. Only about 1% thought **** was "not swearing"; 9% thought the same about shit and 32% of crap.


I just figured out ths place has a language filter. :shock:


Only on one word, as far as I know.
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:26 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
StevePerryHair wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
Thenightbull wrote:cause i've got too be free...................


Dude, you have entirely too much time on your hands. I think you need a full time job!!! :wink:


as opposed to you?? :lol:


No shit Cyberfuckinprick!!, not you, Lynn!! :D :wink:


I must say, I do appreciate some of the heavyweight language coming the XXs around here... at least I know I'm the only alleged fowl one around here. Pleasure to be in such good company ladies. :lol: :lol:




No fucking problem!!! :P :wink:
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:26 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
steveo777 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

The relative severity of various British profanities, as perceived by the public, was studied on behalf of the British Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, BBC and Advertising Standards Authority; the results of this jointly commissioned research were published in December 2000 in a paper called "Delete Expletives". It listed the profanities in order of decreasing severity, the top ten being ****, motherfucker, fuck, wanker, nigger, bastard, prick, bollocks, arsehole, and paki in that order. About 83% of respondents regarded **** as "very severe"; 16% thought the same about shit and 10% about crap. Only about 1% thought **** was "not swearing"; 9% thought the same about shit and 32% of crap.


I just figured out ths place has a language filter. :shock:


Only on one word, as far as I know.


Fortunately it's a word I don't like anyway. :wink: Now what's a fucking paki?
Last edited by steveo777 on Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:26 am

steveo777 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

The relative severity of various British profanities, as perceived by the public, was studied on behalf of the British Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, BBC and Advertising Standards Authority; the results of this jointly commissioned research were published in December 2000 in a paper called "Delete Expletives". It listed the profanities in order of decreasing severity, the top ten being ****, motherfucker, fuck, wanker, nigger, bastard, prick, bollocks, arsehole, and paki in that order. About 83% of respondents regarded **** as "very severe"; 16% thought the same about shit and 10% about crap. Only about 1% thought **** was "not swearing"; 9% thought the same about shit and 32% of crap.


I just figured out ths place has a language filter. :shock:


only for one word... With a reason behind it :lol:
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:52 am

nm - failed experiment. :wink:
Last edited by steveo777 on Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Don » Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:53 am

steveo777 wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
steveo777 wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

The relative severity of various British profanities, as perceived by the public, was studied on behalf of the British Broadcasting Standards Commission, Independent Television Commission, BBC and Advertising Standards Authority; the results of this jointly commissioned research were published in December 2000 in a paper called "Delete Expletives". It listed the profanities in order of decreasing severity, the top ten being ****, motherfucker, fuck, wanker, nigger, bastard, prick, bollocks, arsehole, and paki in that order. About 83% of respondents regarded **** as "very severe"; 16% thought the same about shit and 10% about crap. Only about 1% thought **** was "not swearing"; 9% thought the same about shit and 32% of crap.


I just figured out ths place has a language filter. :shock:


Only on one word, as far as I know.


Fortunately it's a word I don't like anyway. :wink: Now what's a fucking paki?


Pakistanis.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Arianddu » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:05 am

Blueskies wrote:Its not the MR forum that's the main problem, it's the gossiping in PM and the offshoot forums that a member here starts where a group of friends, i.e. a "clique", gather. That in and of itself isn't a problem but when people start talking about members here and start gossip and attack threads about them to garner support from others due to the author holding a grudge, etc. then it develops an even broader scale "group think" which influences peoples views and tension and attitude is brought to this forum.

Many of us here know that the one called The Annex ended up causing a lot of bad blood between people. Many of us here that have been around awhile and especially those that were once a member of that offshoot forum know that there were indeed targeted planned attacks on people here on this forum from the clique that developed there.

I see the same thing happening on your offshoot forum, Beshad.
For example this thread started this week with me as the "topic" to discuss..

http://newwtf.forums1.net/wisdomtruthfr ... -t2131.htm


This is nothing but an example of gossip that causes bad blood between folks. It's stupid and childish. I don't think any right minded person would not see why I may have developed a bit of an attitude about a group of people here who participate in this kind of thing and yet they try to say the problem is all me and that they are just innocent "victims". Which is too ridiculous not to be funny. This is also just one example of a thread of this type. You have started several personal attack threads here on this forum as well, Beshad.

So like I said, it's not MR that's "horrible" or all of the people on it. It's the offshoot forums like yours that just brew more negativity which is then brought here by some as well as the one on one gossiping that goes on in PM.

After that is the problem of people telling me to do as they say and not as they do. The you can dish it out but not take it, thing.


As the person who started that offshoot thread, I can tell you it was an expression of frustration with you and your attitude, especially your insistance that there is a clique railed against you. There is no single clique, but there are a lot of very different people who have all, over time, come to the same place: we are tired of you.

We are tired of you judging our behaviour and our attitudes. You've told BJG off for talking like a man. You've told Carla off for flirting with someone in a way you didn't think was appropriate (and made some very factually incorrect statements about what she did at the same time.) You've told me off for telling you I thought you were wrong. You told S2M off for something he didn't do, in a thread where he was actually defending you. You've made countless value judgements against people, and many of them have been based on misunderstandings, and occaisionally on you completely getting it wrong. Most people here do the same thing every so often - but when it's pointed out to them that they have misread someone, or misunderstood what was said, or gotten the wrong idea, they back down and say 'ok, I got it wrong.' Except you - you've never appologised, you've never said 'sorry, I misunderstood'; it's always someone else's fault with you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of you dragging out old personal fights and making them public. It's no secret that Nat/Angel and I dislike each other. There are some things that have happened between us, some of which have involved other people, that will never be forgiven or forgotten. But neither of us feels the need to spill it all over the board, and we are capable of having a discussion with at least a degree of civility, even when we're pissed off with each other. Most people involved in spats here do the same - except you. You insist on pulling out the same old story every time one of a certain group of people you have a personal history with makes any kind of comment about or to you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of being attacked for holding an opinion that differs from yours. GI Jim and I are never going to agree on evolution, we each think the other is as wrong as you can be, we've even had some heated arguments about it, but we're still friendly, and we never let past debates spill over into what is being talked about now. I don't label him as always wrong because I think he's wrong on one issue, and most people here are able to do that - except you; you brand someone as wrong about something and then ignore everything they say, except to keep 'proving' that you are right and they are wrong.

We are tired of everyone being tarred with the same brush. I haven't called you names, I haven't been vulgar or abusive, I did start a thread on another board, away from this site, that joking suggested we should call you a saint. I could have done it here, where I knew you would see it, but I decided there was no need to add fuel to the fire, so I made a private joke on another site. But I am being tarred with the same brush as though I were Yulog, Beshad, Dean or Dan, using abusive terminology. I don't like to see you being called horrible names, because I don't like to see any woman being called those things. In the past, I've stood up for you, and I've received your abuse in return. Many other people have had the same experience. It's why we don't say anything now, because we know nothing will change. No matter what we do, defend you or stay silent, your response is the same and we are all against you.

We are tired of you deliberately baiting people. It's a horrible pattern to see - people stop responding to you and you start making posts, like you're poking the barking dog that went to sleep, deliberately trying to get it to kick off again. You can see it in this very thread. It's hard to watch that happen, time and again, without eventually concluding that you do it deliberately, that at least on a subconscious level, you like the fight, regardless of who you hurt, who you offend, who you upset.

We've all tried with you, Phyllis. Some of us tried longer, some didn't try very hard at all, but we all tried to be friends, we all tried to get along, we all tried to let the past be the past, and stuff that happened off board stay there, and move on, but you won't let it rest and you won't let us be friends. The fact is, plain and simple, you've worn us all out. No one has the patience to keep trying with you, even when we sympathise, even when we don't like some of the things being said to you. You are rude, prickly, dismissive, argumentative and aggressive, and worse still, when ever someone says 'hang on, what about you', you absolutely refuse to look at your own behaviour, and instead turn everything back on the person who asked the question. I've said it before, I'll say it again - you have some good things to say, and some interesting insights and opinions; the problem is, you seem to be far more interested in picking fights with people and setting yourself up as a martyr.


So, please answer me one question, honestly and without affront - how many people have to say 'enough, I'm tired of your behaviour and attitude' before you will admit that maybe you are wrong, maybe you are the problem. I'd like you to consider the passage of your post I highlighted above: it would be nice if you could start applying it to yourself with some honesty. And I'm wondering if you can do it without the attitude that other people should fix themselves first.
Last edited by Arianddu on Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:08 am

Arianddu wrote:
Blueskies wrote:Its not the MR forum that's the main problem, it's the gossiping in PM and the offshoot forums that a member here starts where a group of friends, i.e. a "clique", gather. That in and of itself isn't a problem but when people start talking about members here and start gossip and attack threads about them to garner support from others due to the author holding a grudge, etc. then it develops an even broader scale "group think" which influences peoples views and tension and attitude is brought to this forum.

Many of us here know that the one called The Annex ended up causing a lot of bad blood between people. Many of us here that have been around awhile and especially those that were once a member of that offshoot forum know that there were indeed targeted planned attacks on people here on this forum from the clique that developed there.

I see the same thing happening on your offshoot forum, Beshad.
For example this thread started this week with me as the "topic" to discuss..

http://newwtf.forums1.net/wisdomtruthfr ... -t2131.htm


This is nothing but an example of gossip that causes bad blood between folks. It's stupid and childish. I don't think any right minded person would not see why I may have developed a bit of an attitude about a group of people here who participate in this kind of thing and yet they try to say the problem is all me and that they are just innocent "victims". Which is too ridiculous not to be funny. This is also just one example of a thread of this type. You have started several personal attack threads here on this forum as well, Beshad.

So like I said, it's not MR that's "horrible" or all of the people on it. It's the offshoot forums like yours that just brew more negativity which is then brought here by some as well as the one on one gossiping that goes on in PM.

After that is the problem of people telling me to do as they say and not as they do. The you can dish it out but not take it, thing.


As the person who started that offshoot thread, I can tell you it was an expression of frustration with you and your attitude, especially your insistance that there is a clique railed against you. There is no single clique, but there are a lot of very different people who have all, over time, come to the same place: we are tired of you.

We are tired of you judging our behaviour and our attitudes. You've told BJG off for talking like a man. You've told Carla off for flirting with someone in a way you didn't think was appropriate (and made some very factually incorrect statements about what she did at the same time.) You've told me off for telling you I thought you were wrong. You told S2M off for something he didn't do, in a thread where he was actually defending you. You've made countless value judgements against people, and many of them have been based on misunderstandings, and occaisionally on you completely getting it wrong. Most people here do the same thing every so often - but when it's pointed out to them that they have misread someone, or misunderstood what was said, or gotten the wrong idea, they back down and say 'ok, I got it wrong.' Except you - you've never appologised, you've never said 'sorry, I misunderstood'; it's always someone else's fault with you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of you dragging out old personal fights and making them public. It's no secret that Nat/Angel and I dislike each other. There are some things that have happened between us, some of which have involved other people, that will never be forgiven or forgotten. But neither of us feels the need to spill it all over the board, and we are capable of having a discussion with at least a degree of civility, even when we're pissed off with each other. Most people involved in spats here do the same - except you. You insist on pulling out the same old story every time one of a certain group of people you have a personal history with makes any kind of comment about or to you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of being attacked for holding an opinion that differs from yours. GI Jim and I are never going to agree on evolution, we each think the other is as wrong as you can be, we've even had some heated arguments about it, but we're still friendly, and we never let past debates spill over into what is being talked about now. I don't label him as always wrong because I think he's wrong on one issue, but you do. And most people here are able to do that - except you; you brand someone as wrong about something and then ignore everything they say, except to keep 'proving' that you are right and they are wrong.

We are tired of everyone being tarred with the same brush. I haven't called you names, I haven't been vulgar or abusive, I did start a thread on another board, away from this site, that joking suggested we should call you a saint. I could have done it here, where I knew you would see it, but I decided there was no need to add fuel to the fire, so I made a private joke on another site. But I am being tarred with the same brush as though I were Yulog, Beshad, Dean or Dan, using abusive terminology. I don't like to see you being called horrible names, because I don't like to see any woman being called those things. In the past, I've stood up for you, and I've received your abuse in return. Many other people have had the same experience. It's why we don't say anything now, because we know nothing will change. No matter what we do, defend you or stay silent, your response is the same and we are all against you.

We are tired of you deliberately baiting people. It's a horrible pattern to see - people stop responding to you and you start making posts, like you're poking the barking dog that went to sleep, deliberately trying to get it to kick off again. You can see it in this very thread. It's hard to watch that happen, time and again, without eventually concluding that you do it deliberately, that at least on a subconscious level, you like the fight, regardless of who you hurt, who you offend, who you upset.

We've all tried with you, Phyllis. Some of us tried longer, some didn't try very hard at all, but we all tried to be friends, we all tried to get along, we all tried to let the past be the past, and stuff that happened off board stay there, and move on, but you won't let it rest and you won't let us be friends. The fact is, plain and simple, you've worn us all out. No one has the patience to keep trying with you, even when we sympathise, even when we don't like some of the things being said to you. You are rude, prickly, dismissive, argumentative and aggressive, and worse still, when ever someone says 'hang on, what about you', you absolutely refuse to look at your own behaviour, and instead turn everything back on the person who asked the question. I've said it before, I'll say it again - you have some good things to say, and some interesting insights and opinions; the problem is, you seem to be far more interested in picking fights with people and setting yourself up as a martyr.


So, please answer me one question, honestly and without affront - how many people have to say 'enough, I'm tired of your behaviour and attitude' before you will admit that maybe you are wrong, maybe you are the problem. I'd like you to consider the passage of your post I highlighted above: it would be nice if you could start applying it to yourself with some honesty. And I'm wondering if you can do it without the attitude that other people should fix themselves first.



WOW....ARI!

Well I guess the history is long and twisted......I think there is way more than what has been portrayed here.
Last edited by portland on Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Behshad » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:11 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:14 am

Arianddu wrote:
Blueskies wrote:Its not the MR forum that's the main problem, it's the gossiping in PM and the offshoot forums that a member here starts where a group of friends, i.e. a "clique", gather. That in and of itself isn't a problem but when people start talking about members here and start gossip and attack threads about them to garner support from others due to the author holding a grudge, etc. then it develops an even broader scale "group think" which influences peoples views and tension and attitude is brought to this forum.

Many of us here know that the one called The Annex ended up causing a lot of bad blood between people. Many of us here that have been around awhile and especially those that were once a member of that offshoot forum know that there were indeed targeted planned attacks on people here on this forum from the clique that developed there.

I see the same thing happening on your offshoot forum, Beshad.
For example this thread started this week with me as the "topic" to discuss..

http://newwtf.forums1.net/wisdomtruthfr ... -t2131.htm


This is nothing but an example of gossip that causes bad blood between folks. It's stupid and childish. I don't think any right minded person would not see why I may have developed a bit of an attitude about a group of people here who participate in this kind of thing and yet they try to say the problem is all me and that they are just innocent "victims". Which is too ridiculous not to be funny. This is also just one example of a thread of this type. You have started several personal attack threads here on this forum as well, Beshad.

So like I said, it's not MR that's "horrible" or all of the people on it. It's the offshoot forums like yours that just brew more negativity which is then brought here by some as well as the one on one gossiping that goes on in PM.

After that is the problem of people telling me to do as they say and not as they do. The you can dish it out but not take it, thing.


As the person who started that offshoot thread, I can tell you it was an expression of frustration with you and your attitude, especially your insistance that there is a clique railed against you. There is no single clique, but there are a lot of very different people who have all, over time, come to the same place: we are tired of you.

We are tired of you judging our behaviour and our attitudes. You've told BJG off for talking like a man. You've told Carla off for flirting with someone in a way you didn't think was appropriate (and made some very factually incorrect statements about what she did at the same time.) You've told me off for telling you I thought you were wrong. You told S2M off for something he didn't do, in a thread where he was actually defending you. You've made countless value judgements against people, and many of them have been based on misunderstandings, and occaisionally on you completely getting it wrong. Most people here do the same thing every so often - but when it's pointed out to them that they have misread someone, or misunderstood what was said, or gotten the wrong idea, they back down and say 'ok, I got it wrong.' Except you - you've never appologised, you've never said 'sorry, I misunderstood'; it's always someone else's fault with you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of you dragging out old personal fights and making them public. It's no secret that Nat/Angel and I dislike each other. There are some things that have happened between us, some of which have involved other people, that will never be forgiven or forgotten. But neither of us feels the need to spill it all over the board, and we are capable of having a discussion with at least a degree of civility, even when we're pissed off with each other. Most people involved in spats here do the same - except you. You insist on pulling out the same old story every time one of a certain group of people you have a personal history with makes any kind of comment about or to you. And we are tired of it.

We are tired of being attacked for holding an opinion that differs from yours. GI Jim and I are never going to agree on evolution, we each think the other is as wrong as you can be, we've even had some heated arguments about it, but we're still friendly, and we never let past debates spill over into what is being talked about now. I don't label him as always wrong because I think he's wrong on one issue, and most people here are able to do that - except you; you brand someone as wrong about something and then ignore everything they say, except to keep 'proving' that you are right and they are wrong.

We are tired of everyone being tarred with the same brush. I haven't called you names, I haven't been vulgar or abusive, I did start a thread on another board, away from this site, that joking suggested we should call you a saint. I could have done it here, where I knew you would see it, but I decided there was no need to add fuel to the fire, so I made a private joke on another site. But I am being tarred with the same brush as though I were Yulog, Beshad, Dean or Dan, using abusive terminology. I don't like to see you being called horrible names, because I don't like to see any woman being called those things. In the past, I've stood up for you, and I've received your abuse in return. Many other people have had the same experience. It's why we don't say anything now, because we know nothing will change. No matter what we do, defend you or stay silent, your response is the same and we are all against you.

We are tired of you deliberately baiting people. It's a horrible pattern to see - people stop responding to you and you start making posts, like you're poking the barking dog that went to sleep, deliberately trying to get it to kick off again. You can see it in this very thread. It's hard to watch that happen, time and again, without eventually concluding that you do it deliberately, that at least on a subconscious level, you like the fight, regardless of who you hurt, who you offend, who you upset.

We've all tried with you, Phyllis. Some of us tried longer, some didn't try very hard at all, but we all tried to be friends, we all tried to get along, we all tried to let the past be the past, and stuff that happened off board stay there, and move on, but you won't let it rest and you won't let us be friends. The fact is, plain and simple, you've worn us all out. No one has the patience to keep trying with you, even when we sympathise, even when we don't like some of the things being said to you. You are rude, prickly, dismissive, argumentative and aggressive, and worse still, when ever someone says 'hang on, what about you', you absolutely refuse to look at your own behaviour, and instead turn everything back on the person who asked the question. I've said it before, I'll say it again - you have some good things to say, and some interesting insights and opinions; the problem is, you seem to be far more interested in picking fights with people and setting yourself up as a martyr.


So, please answer me one question, honestly and without affront - how many people have to say 'enough, I'm tired of your behaviour and attitude' before you will admit that maybe you are wrong, maybe you are the problem. I'd like you to consider the passage of your post I highlighted above: it would be nice if you could start applying it to yourself with some honesty. And I'm wondering if you can do it without the attitude that other people should fix themselves first.



Amazing post! :D
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:14 am

and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:16 am

portland wrote:and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:



As long as the 'bat doesn't wake up and take particular interest in it. :wink:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Behshad » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:18 am

And now we wait ,,,,, I can almost hear the squeek the coffin makes as it opens slowly and The Leviathan slowly crawling out slowly and approaching her 2009 Rainbow vaccum cleaner , with dual pipes and nitro ,,, blasting into the sky and dive down to the depth of the oceans to open the abyss where she keeps her Dell PC , slowly scrolling through the words of wisdom written by Ari ,,, and then just when we all thought she'd make yet another long meaningless post with the same message over and over again , she surprises us all by typing " you're right Ari. I'm wrong. Thank you for showing me the light at the end of this dark long and lonely tunnel. "


:)
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:18 am

steveo777 wrote:
portland wrote:and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:



As long as the 'bat doesn't wake up and take particular interest in it. :wink:



Oh he will....but he has let it ride so far...who wants to go for broke?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:23 am

portland wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
portland wrote:and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:



As long as the 'bat doesn't wake up and take particular interest in it. :wink:



Oh he will....but he has let it ride so far...who wants to go for broke?


He's probably just as amused as the rest of us as we watch this wretched, cobweb infested gash show the world her smelly backside.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Arianddu » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:24 am

portland wrote:and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Actually, there's a way to kill the thread stone dead; stop responding to her. I'm quite sure I've added fuel to the fire, but she manages to bait me too. The problem with Phyllis is, when people give up and just stop responding in the hope she'll stop, she say it means they support her. For a while I just responded to everything she said with 'Yes Phyllis :roll: ', and for a few days she tried to bait me into a fight. I was asked to stop because she was using it to pick more fights, and other people were getting involved with her baiting.

Personally I think the fastest way to stop the Phyllis-Martyr-Train is for everyone to respond to her fight-picking posts with 'yup, whatever.' Don't engage, don't respond, just make it clear that you have read and don't want to be involved any more. Maybe it would finally get through to her; she can actually be quite interesting and insightful if she isn't on her high horse distributing proclaimations and judgements. Unfortunately I think there are a few too many people on here who actually like the fight too much to make it stop, but we could always try.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby Arianddu » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:27 am

Guys - personal request: can we lay off the abuse? I know you're all fed up to the back teeth with her and need to vent, but I really hate seeing that kind of stuff being said about anyone, even someone I dislike. It's not just offensive to Phyllis, you know?

Anyway - please, pretty please, ease up on the graphic insults? Thanks.
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby artist4perry » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:28 am

Behshad wrote:And now we wait ,,,,, I can almost hear the squeek the coffin makes as it opens slowly and The Leviathan slowly crawling out slowly and approaching her 2009 Rainbow vaccum cleaner , with dual pipes and nitro ,,, blasting into the sky and dive down to the depth of the oceans to open the abyss where she keeps her Dell PC , slowly scrolling through the words of wisdom written by Ari ,,, and then just when we all thought she'd make yet another long meaningless post with the same message over and over again , she surprises us all by typing " you're right Ari. I'm wrong. Thank you for showing me the light at the end of this dark long and lonely tunnel. "


:)


What are you smoking Rufus? :? :wink: :lol: :P
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby steveo777 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:28 am

Arianddu wrote:Guys - personal request: can we lay off the abuse? I know you're all fed up to the back teeth with her and need to vent, but I really hate seeing that kind of stuff being said about anyone, even someone I dislike. It's not just offensive to Phyllis, you know?

Anyway - please, pretty please, ease up on the graphic insults? Thanks.



Only for you. :D
Graphics removed, insults still stand. :wink:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby StevePerryHair » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:30 am

Not necessarily Ari. Did you see 30 pages ago when she tried to bait me over and over and over because I WAS ignoring her? It's like a child who needs attention, and they'll take it even if it's negative.
User avatar
StevePerryHair
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8504
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Mickey's World

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:31 am

Arianddu wrote:
portland wrote:and well this thread is FAR from DEAD!!! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Actually, there's a way to kill the thread stone dead; stop responding to her. I'm quite sure I've added fuel to the fire, but she manages to bait me too. The problem with Phyllis is, when people give up and just stop responding in the hope she'll stop, she say it means they support her. For a while I just responded to everything she said with 'Yes Phyllis :roll: ', and for a few days she tried to bait me into a fight. I was asked to stop because she was using it to pick more fights, and other people were getting involved with her baiting.

Personally I think the fastest way to stop the Phyllis-Martyr-Train is for everyone to respond to her fight-picking posts with 'yup, whatever.' Don't engage, don't respond, just make it clear that you have read and don't want to be involved any more. Maybe it would finally get through to her; she can actually be quite interesting and insightful if she isn't on her high horse distributing proclaimations and judgements. Unfortunately I think there are a few too many people on here who actually like the fight too much to make it stop, but we could always try.



Well I tried the reasonable approach...and well that did not work at all.

I have no "dog" in this fight...except that I feel that it is absolute bullshit to pull the victim card when
you FULL well bring it on yourself!!!
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby portland » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:33 am

Behshad wrote:And now we wait ,,,,, I can almost hear the squeek the coffin makes as it opens slowly and The Leviathan slowly crawling out slowly and approaching her 2009 Rainbow vaccum cleaner , with dual pipes and nitro ,,, blasting into the sky and dive down to the depth of the oceans to open the abyss where she keeps her Dell PC , slowly scrolling through the words of wisdom written by Ari ,,, and then just when we all thought she'd make yet another long meaningless post with the same message over and over again , she surprises us all by typing " you're right Ari. I'm wrong. Thank you for showing me the light at the end of this dark long and lonely tunnel. "


:)


Hey I have a Rainbow vacuum cleaner!!! and it is very good at sucking out dirt!! :wink:
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Behshad » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:34 am

Arianddu wrote:Guys - personal request: can we lay off the abuse? I know you're all fed up to the back teeth with her and need to vent, but I really hate seeing that kind of stuff being said about anyone, even someone I dislike. It's not just offensive to Phyllis, you know?

Anyway - please, pretty please, ease up on the graphic insults? Thanks.



This isn't fucking BT. If you don't like graphic language may I suggest Disney.com ?!

We are adults here and sometimes in heated discussions some adult language is used. It's not the end of the world. Most people get over it two seconds later. Most people know what was said was just in the heat of the moment and not an actual hate.
The only person who doesn't see it that way at all is Phyl. Fuck her and the Rainbow she flew in on :)
Last edited by Behshad on Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests