Idea for next Journey Album...

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 6:48 am

Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


Gun, that last GH Live album sucks. Sure Perry sounds his remarkable self, but that was the worst mixed piece of trash ever. No crowd noise, no ambiance, nothing.

And Captured was just the opposite. That live album is stellar. And going double platinum(I am thinking it's leaning toward triple), is pretty good considering it came out in the time vinyl, and it cost 15 bucks. Can you imagine if they would have sold that like they did that piece of shit Revelations package, all for 7 bucks and change?
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Jana » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:03 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


Gun, that last GH Live album sucks. Sure Perry sounds his remarkable self, but that was the worst mixed piece of trash ever. No crowd noise, no ambiance, nothing.

And Captured was just the opposite. That live album is stellar. And going double platinum(I am thinking it's leaning toward triple), is pretty good considering it came out in the time vinyl, and it cost 15 bucks. Can you imagine if they would have sold that like they did that piece of shit Revelations package, all for 7 bucks and change?


Get your facts straight, Deano. Eleven dollars and change for the Revelations package, not seven dollars. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Since 78 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:03 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Since 78 wrote:
Jana wrote:
Since 78 wrote:
Jana wrote:no. I've said all along I would like a second disk live album.


I don't know, what would they put on a live album? I'm up to here with the DD.


They did about five different songs off Revelation. They did WYLAW. That's never been performed live, which I thought Arnel did a great job on. I would like Deen on a song or two that he did last year or the year b/f. Maybe chain reaction or rubicon or some of those arnel did off the Graspop show, which that show really rocked hard. I think it would be great. One More live would be nice. Higher Place Arnel did. There's a lot.


Ok, But if they were going to do a live album, I would prefer Deans Recaptured concept and I personally wouldn't want any Perry material, which at this point wouldn't be feasible as they don't have enough live material for that.


This is the YOU I know and love ...the demons are gone?!?! :?


What? I only said that I didn't mind the re-records. Ive never seriously wanted that trend to continue. The only exception would be Red 13 because I would like to see those songs have a chance to be heard.
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby Don » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:11 am

steveo777 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


A lot of these albums don't immediately hit their highest status. Some take years...just look at GH. It's been enjoying latent success.


Captured took 17 years to reach 2xPlatinum. That's a lot of time to build up sales. Journey's Greatest Hits took 10 years to sell 9 million copies. It's sold 7 million additional copies since then.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:15 am

Jana wrote:Get your facts straight, Deano. Eleven dollars and change for the Revelations package, not seven dollars. :lol: :lol: :lol:



:lol:

Typical Bald-faced BLATENT exaggeration.
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:15 am

Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


Gun, that last GH Live album sucks. Sure Perry sounds his remarkable self, but that was the worst mixed piece of trash ever. No crowd noise, no ambiance, nothing.

And Captured was just the opposite. That live album is stellar. And going double platinum(I am thinking it's leaning toward triple), is pretty good considering it came out in the time vinyl, and it cost 15 bucks. Can you imagine if they would have sold that like they did that piece of shit Revelations package, all for 7 bucks and change?


Get your facts straight, Deano. Eleven dollars and change for the Revelations package, not seven dollars. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Whatever. Pennies for a garbage set of discs. A three piece package, if done right and classy, with a disc of good new music should be about 20, 22 bucks. LOL, 11 dollars for three discs? Jesus Jana, can't expect much for that. No wonder it went gold, err double platinum, LOL. Riiiiiiggghhhttt. Double platinum my ass. Hey whatever, you dumbasses eat it up; you'll do anything Neal tells you to do.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Don » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:19 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


Gun, that last GH Live album sucks. Sure Perry sounds his remarkable self, but that was the worst mixed piece of trash ever. No crowd noise, no ambiance, nothing.

And Captured was just the opposite. That live album is stellar. And going double platinum(I am thinking it's leaning toward triple), is pretty good considering it came out in the time vinyl, and it cost 15 bucks. Can you imagine if they would have sold that like they did that piece of shit Revelations package, all for 7 bucks and change?


Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:28 am

Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Jana » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:36 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:On the subject of live CDs, Journey's last live Album only went gold and Captured, only 2X platinum.


Gun, that last GH Live album sucks. Sure Perry sounds his remarkable self, but that was the worst mixed piece of trash ever. No crowd noise, no ambiance, nothing.

And Captured was just the opposite. That live album is stellar. And going double platinum(I am thinking it's leaning toward triple), is pretty good considering it came out in the time vinyl, and it cost 15 bucks. Can you imagine if they would have sold that like they did that piece of shit Revelations package, all for 7 bucks and change?


Get your facts straight, Deano. Eleven dollars and change for the Revelations package, not seven dollars. :lol: :lol: :lol:


Whatever. Pennies for a garbage set of discs. A three piece package, if done right and classy, with a disc of good new music should be about 20, 22 bucks. LOL, 11 dollars for three discs? Jesus Jana, can't expect much for that. No wonder it went gold, err double platinum, LOL. Riiiiiiggghhhttt. Double platinum my ass. Hey whatever, you dumbasses eat it up; you'll do anything Neal tells you to do.


Wrong. I don't care about sales numbers. It sold well for an older band on its third singer, yes, third to me. I never feel the need to make them any more than they are. Revelation has already or is pretty close to selling 1,000,000 cds, which will make it legitimately platinum, not the funky numbers. and, I realize they had to package it with stuff to sell it with a new singer. I'm not on here telling anyone they've matched their hey day. Never have said that. I don't expect it. I don't think the new album will sell more than Gold, and that's fine for an older band with or without the lead singer, that isn't a bruce or bono type success. so keep bashing them all you want b/c they don't sell cds hugely. They're doing good for a thirty-something-year-old band that most people hadn't heard about for years. and I pray this new cd is great listening from beginning to end; but if not, I will enjoy the songs on it I like, and still go see them b/c they won't be around forever, and this is a great band musicianshipwise to see live.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:09 am

Jana wrote:rf

Wrong. I don't care about sales numbers. It sold well for an older band on its third singer, yes, third to me. I never feel the need to make them any more than they are. Revelation has already or is pretty close to selling 1,000,000 cds, which will make it legitimately platinum, not the funky numbers. and, I realize they had to package it with stuff to sell it with a new singer. I'm not on here telling anyone they've matched their hey day. Never have said that. I don't expect it. I don't think the new album will sell more than Gold, and that's fine for an older band with or without the lead singer, that isn't a bruce or bono type success. so keep bashing them all you want b/c they don't sell cds hugely. They're doing good for a thirty-something-year-old band that most people hadn't heard about for years. and I pray this new cd is great listening from beginning to end; but if not, I will enjoy the songs on it I like, and still go see them b/c they won't be around forever, and this is a great band musicianshipwise to see live.


I am not bashing them Jana. What I don't understand is that they are good musicians who should be able to create better and put out a better effort. They have the ability to do so. I am not a basher for basher's sake...that shit gets old fast. What I am is somebody who lost the band and would like to give it a chance to get me back, but it can't be some ordinary typical 80's band crap. I'm never going to expect Journey to rival Bruce or Bono, that will never happen. However, they're better than those "other" bands- Styx, Boston, REO, Foreigner, all of them, and everyone knows it too. . That's what pisses me off. I have never bashed Neal or Jon for their skills; only a jealous pissed off loser would do so. What I will criticize them for is being ball-less and creatively bankrupt. They better find it or this could be the end of the road for them. Maybe Pineda can actually input some creative juice? I would like to think he can offer up more than just a voice. Who knows how talented he is? We will soon find out. If he has no writing credits for a new disc, then he is nothing more than a hired singer, paid to sing songs by others. Am I right?
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Ehwmatt » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:18 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?


Aren't a lot of the tunes on GH Live not quite approaching RoR lightning tempo, but much faster than the studio counterparts as well? I haven't listened to any of those versions in a long time and I don't think it's currently loaded on my computer, but I remember a lot of the tunes being played pretty fast. That ruined a lot of the songs for me, if I'm remembering right.

Captured's where it's at.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Jana » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:19 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Jana wrote:rf

Wrong. I don't care about sales numbers. It sold well for an older band on its third singer, yes, third to me. I never feel the need to make them any more than they are. Revelation has already or is pretty close to selling 1,000,000 cds, which will make it legitimately platinum, not the funky numbers. and, I realize they had to package it with stuff to sell it with a new singer. I'm not on here telling anyone they've matched their hey day. Never have said that. I don't expect it. I don't think the new album will sell more than Gold, and that's fine for an older band with or without the lead singer, that isn't a bruce or bono type success. so keep bashing them all you want b/c they don't sell cds hugely. They're doing good for a thirty-something-year-old band that most people hadn't heard about for years. and I pray this new cd is great listening from beginning to end; but if not, I will enjoy the songs on it I like, and still go see them b/c they won't be around forever, and this is a great band musicianshipwise to see live.


I am not bashing them Jana. What I don't understand is that they are good musicians who should be able to create better and put out a better effort. They have the ability to do so. I am not a basher for basher's sake...that shit gets old fast. What I am is somebody who lost the band and would like to give it a chance to get me back, but it can't be some ordinary typical 80's band crap. I'm never going to expect Journey to rival Bruce or Bono, that will never happen. However, they're better than those "other" bands- Styx, Boston, REO, Foreigner, all of them, and everyone knows it too. . That's what pisses me off. I have never bashed Neal or Jon for their skills; only a jealous pissed off loser would do so. What I will criticize them for is being ball-less and creatively bankrupt. They better find it or this could be the end of the road for them. Maybe Pineda can actually input some creative juice? I would like to think he can offer up more than just a voice. Who knows how talented he is? We will soon find out. If he has no writing credits for a new disc, then he is nothing more than a hired singer, paid to sing songs by others. Am I right?


I agree, if he has nothing to do with writing the new songs, then he is just the singer who interprets the songs (like jss on w.e.t.) but not a huge creative force in the band, right. But I love Arnel in concert. He has a stunning powerful voice that fills the arena and compliments Journey music, so it won't stop me one nano-second from still going and enjoying a great concert or their new songs, the ones that I like.

For Depeche Mode, Dave Gahan, all those years never wrote any of the songs, until he demanded to be included in the songwriting process in the late 90s or whenever it was. I can't remember. but he never wrote the music in the 80s to mid 90s. Yet, as the frontman of the band, he was still considered the identifiable head of the band to the average casual fan.

And I agree with you, I hope they really knock this out of the park and not go by the numbers on this album. I felt like Arrival really was an evolution of the band at a certain stage agewise and yearwise that translated well into 2001 and a fantastic album overall, and I felt Revelation had a couple great songs and some good songs, the rest average, but not a great album, but a good album. You're right, they have great potential, so I hope they do have the creative juices flowing. I hope the concept idea really works.
Last edited by Jana on Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:23 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?


Aren't a lot of the tunes on GH Live not quite approaching RoR lightning tempo, but much faster than the studio counterparts as well? I haven't listened to any of those versions in a long time and I don't think it's currently loaded on my computer, but I remember a lot of the tunes being played pretty fast. That ruined a lot of the songs for me, if I'm remembering right.

Captured's where it's at.


IIRC, GH Live was done close to the original speed of the studio. Gunbot will correct me if I am wrong. ROR was too fast, way too fast, except the ROR material, you notice that? It's as if they wanted to slow down the music they were trying to sell at the time.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Ehwmatt » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:27 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?


Aren't a lot of the tunes on GH Live not quite approaching RoR lightning tempo, but much faster than the studio counterparts as well? I haven't listened to any of those versions in a long time and I don't think it's currently loaded on my computer, but I remember a lot of the tunes being played pretty fast. That ruined a lot of the songs for me, if I'm remembering right.

Captured's where it's at.


IIRC, GH Live was done close to the original speed of the studio. Gunbot will correct me if I am wrong. ROR was too fast, way too fast, except the ROR material, you notice that? It's as if they wanted to slow down the music they were trying to sell at the time.


Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:30 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Don » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:35 am

Ehwmatt wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?


Aren't a lot of the tunes on GH Live not quite approaching RoR lightning tempo, but much faster than the studio counterparts as well? I haven't listened to any of those versions in a long time and I don't think it's currently loaded on my computer, but I remember a lot of the tunes being played pretty fast. That ruined a lot of the songs for me, if I'm remembering right.

Captured's where it's at.


IIRC, GH Live was done close to the original speed of the studio. Gunbot will correct me if I am wrong. ROR was too fast, way too fast, except the ROR material, you notice that? It's as if they wanted to slow down the music they were trying to sell at the time.


Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


A few of the Frontiers songs from the GH Live were done very well. They were lifted from the Budokan shows and done pretty much with the correct tempo.

I'm not a fan of ROR and the live versions of songs from that album come off flat to me, almost like the keyboards/synths are muffled.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Jana » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:35 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby steveo777 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:37 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


One retread sounds fantastic to my ears and that is WCN. The rest....meh.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby portland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:40 am

Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Jana » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:44 am

portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:


Oh, you heard me saying the word "loser" and you came a-runnin'. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby portland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:56 am

Jana wrote:
portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:


Oh, you heard me saying the word "loser" and you came a-runnin'. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Jana don't be so hard on yourself...your a Pinhead not a loser! :lol: :wink:
Last edited by portland on Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Since 78 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:00 am

portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:


Oh, you heard me saying the word "loser" and you came a-runnin'. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Jana don't be so hard on yourself...your a Pinhead not a looser! :lol: :wink:


You walked right into that one portland! :lol:
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby portland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:03 am

Since 78 wrote:
portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:


Oh, you heard me saying the word "loser" and you came a-runnin'. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Jana don't be so hard on yourself...your a Pinhead not a looser! :lol: :wink:


You walked right into that one portland! :lol:


Um no...I think she did!
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Don » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:19 am

Loser, not looser.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Since 78 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:23 am

Gunbot wrote:Loser, not looser.


:lol:
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby portland » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:23 am

Gunbot wrote:Loser, not looser.



soorry, my oooo key sticks!
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Red13JoePa » Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:36 am

Shirley produced GHL w/ association from perry.

It was one of those "coincidental (LOL)" releases that happend to drop when the new lineup was firing up a tour and "Remember Me."
"I love almost everybody."---Rocky Balboa 1990
"Let's reform this thing.Let's go out and get some guys who want to work and go do it"--Neal Schon February, 2001
"I looked at Neal, and I just saw a guy who really wants his band back"-JCain 2/01
Red13JoePa
MP3
 
Posts: 11646
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:43 pm
Location: Happy Valley

Postby steveo777 » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:04 am

portland wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Loser, not looser.



soorry, my oooo key sticks!


Looser = floozy (or someone who doesn't understand kagels) :wink:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby perryswoman » Thu Mar 18, 2010 2:20 pm

Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
Captured is actually my favorite Journey album. It's a great collection, presented with a much more matured tenor sound from Perry, compared to the original studio recordings.
I am not very fond of the second live album, especially where they edited out the city name in DSB and dropped in studio overlay on it. Defeats the purpose of being live, when you are going to mix and match like that.


I agree with you 100% on these two observations. The latter album is a disappointment because they had some good Frontiers material on there. Why couldn't they just mix the damned album right? Why the drop ins, and no crowd? How hard would it be? I know Kevin didn't tweak Perry's vocals; there was no need to. Or did Perry himself produce that? I haven't seen my copy in ten years. Somebody?


Aren't a lot of the tunes on GH Live not quite approaching RoR lightning tempo, but much faster than the studio counterparts as well? I haven't listened to any of those versions in a long time and I don't think it's currently loaded on my computer, but I remember a lot of the tunes being played pretty fast. That ruined a lot of the songs for me, if I'm remembering right.

Captured's where it's at.


IIRC, GH Live was done close to the original speed of the studio. Gunbot will correct me if I am wrong. ROR was too fast, way too fast, except the ROR material, you notice that? It's as if they wanted to slow down the music they were trying to sell at the time.





That is a good point Deano. I hated they sped up the songs but didn't realize they didn't on the ROR material. Interesting. Yeah ruined it for me too.
Come back Steve Perry!!
perryswoman
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:25 am
Location: sc

Postby Rockindeano » Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:30 pm

portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Ehwmatt wrote:
Hm, maybe I'm wrong. I could just be remembering the crappy audio quality. I remember the thing that really struck me was how bad Cain's piano/synths sounded on the album. They sounded like toys, much like they did on the retreads on Rev.


They did sound really bad. As for the retreads, I will never listen to them, never. That is for losers and Pinheads. No thanks.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Call me a pinhead/loser b/c I have Arnel's version of Faithfully to listen to. Not b/c it was better than Perry's. It wasn't. but b/c I like his raw, powerful, crystal clear vocals on it. And b/f the loons jump in here, I listen to Perry all the time on Faithfully, stunning. And I think probably once a year I would pull out the retreads just to enjoy Arnel. Nothing wrong with that. :wink:




You called :lol:




Oh, you heard me saying the word "loser" and you came a-runnin'. :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



Jana don't be so hard on yourself...your a Pinhead not a looser! :lol: :wink:



Fuck, I hate that. Why can't people use the word LOSER instead of LOOSER? It isn't that hard to do Holly.

Now fix it.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests

cron