Angel wrote:parfait wrote:[Charming, smart and good looking? Come on. I'm everybody's type!
Urinating in a girls mouth? Does that fall under charming, smart or good looking???
Actually i think that goes under the talented category


Moderator: Andrew
Angel wrote:parfait wrote:[Charming, smart and good looking? Come on. I'm everybody's type!
Urinating in a girls mouth? Does that fall under charming, smart or good looking???
G.I.Jim wrote:
I've never served in combat. I've only trained for it. I've spent many weeks in tents with fellow soldiers, and I can tell you the reason there were no problems is because they didn't flaunt to us that they were gay. You've spent enough nights in hotel rooms that I'm sure you've been tea bagged PLENTY of times!
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
yulog wrote:Angel wrote:parfait wrote:[Charming, smart and good looking? Come on. I'm everybody's type!
Urinating in a girls mouth? Does that fall under charming, smart or good looking???
Actually i think that goes under the talented category![]()
Behshad wrote:Jana wrote:Behshad wrote:Jana wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:stevew2 wrote:Thats fine, but i wouldnt want to "bunk" with you dollBobbyinTN wrote:Thank God it's gone. Congrats to every gay soldier out there. You can now serve your country openly and honestly.
Thanks Obama and democrats and the few republicans who moved us into the 21st Century.
(I hate this laptop I'm having to use, but it's better than nothing)
Trust me, you're NOTHING I'd ever be interested in.
WOW! The egos on straight men are hilarious.
I have a friend who is bisexual and stunning. And she told me once it was a joke, every straight female that knows she's bisexual thinks she looks at them in that way and are offended if she doesn't think of them that way (from an egotistical standpoint). This girl is beyond picky for males and females and probably is only attracted to like two percent of who she meets.
That's like saying a female heterosexual checks every male out and is attracted to all of them. NOT.
You should hook your friend up with Parfait. That way she gets a bf/gf in one pretty package
He is her type, lol.
So the 2% category you're talking about is people who enjoy Golden Showers ?!
BobbyinTN wrote:Angel wrote:I once worked with a man that was openly gay, he wore semi-crossdressing type clothes, often wore makeup and flaunted his sexuality. Many people that worked with him were very uncomfortable around him-not because of the way he dressed or the way he looked but the way he constantly went on and on about his sexual preferences-making comments about men that would come in, talking about his dates and his sex life-very openly and very graphically. Finally someone complained and he played the "you're discriminating against me because I'm gay" card and nothing happened to him-he continued in his ways. A few months later one of the women in our department was talking about getting her hair done and just made the comment that she didn't like having her hair done by men-she specifially said "I don't want a fu-fu man working on my hair." The gay man heard it and complained-she ended up being written up, having disciplinary action taken against her, she had to participate in some weird "sensitivity training" class and nearly lost her job. I believe it's situations like this that lead to DADT and while I'm glad it's gone, I can also see why it may have come about in the first place.
Sounds like every person I've ever encountered at work places. Everyone talks about their "sexuality" even when it's just mentioning a wife or a husband.
I think the problem is with the people who have the problem, not with the gay guy you're talking about.
BobbyinTN wrote:I'd rather be around someone who is themselves rather than someone others want them to be.
Jana wrote:Behshad wrote:Jana wrote:Behshad wrote:Jana wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:stevew2 wrote:Thats fine, but i wouldnt want to "bunk" with you dollBobbyinTN wrote:Thank God it's gone. Congrats to every gay soldier out there. You can now serve your country openly and honestly.
Thanks Obama and democrats and the few republicans who moved us into the 21st Century.
(I hate this laptop I'm having to use, but it's better than nothing)
Trust me, you're NOTHING I'd ever be interested in.
WOW! The egos on straight men are hilarious.
I have a friend who is bisexual and stunning. And she told me once it was a joke, every straight female that knows she's bisexual thinks she looks at them in that way and are offended if she doesn't think of them that way (from an egotistical standpoint). This girl is beyond picky for males and females and probably is only attracted to like two percent of who she meets.
That's like saying a female heterosexual checks every male out and is attracted to all of them. NOT.
You should hook your friend up with Parfait. That way she gets a bf/gf in one pretty package
He is her type, lol.
So the 2% category you're talking about is people who enjoy Golden Showers ?!
LOL I forgot about that. She's a germophobe. Might not work.She likes guys that are more metrosexual looking and kind of pretty in a guy sort of way, no body hair, no body fat, so why he's her type.
Saint John wrote:I would let the military members vote on it. If they voted for gays in the military, then I'm ok with it. If they voted no, then I'd be ok with that, too.
Saint John wrote:I would let the military members vote on it. If they voted for gays in the military, then I'm ok with it. If they voted no, then I'd be ok with that, too.
steveo777 wrote:Saint John wrote:I would let the military members vote on it. If they voted for gays in the military, then I'm ok with it. If they voted no, then I'd be ok with that, too.
If you let the people vote then it would become a miltary of free will instead of doing what is ordered. That concept doesn't work too well under combat conditions. It's best that the powers that be decide how it will be and the ranks need to follow what is decided.
G.I.Jim wrote:steveo777 wrote:Saint John wrote:I would let the military members vote on it. If they voted for gays in the military, then I'm ok with it. If they voted no, then I'd be ok with that, too.
If you let the people vote then it would become a miltary of free will instead of doing what is ordered. That concept doesn't work too well under combat conditions. It's best that the powers that be decide how it will be and the ranks need to follow what is decided.
Why do you think the military leaders are against this? Because they DO ask the soldiers and leaders what they think. We've been hit up with surveys a couple of times this past year about this specific subject. The leadership knows how the soldiers feel about it, and that's why they don't recommend that it be changed.
I do take orders, and like I said... it won't affect me that much where I work. It just affects those that are out there in the trenches everyday.
Jana wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:steveo777 wrote:Saint John wrote:I would let the military members vote on it. If they voted for gays in the military, then I'm ok with it. If they voted no, then I'd be ok with that, too.
If you let the people vote then it would become a miltary of free will instead of doing what is ordered. That concept doesn't work too well under combat conditions. It's best that the powers that be decide how it will be and the ranks need to follow what is decided.
Why do you think the military leaders are against this? Because they DO ask the soldiers and leaders what they think. We've been hit up with surveys a couple of times this past year about this specific subject. The leadership knows how the soldiers feel about it, and that's why they don't recommend that it be changed.
I do take orders, and like I said... it won't affect me that much where I work. It just affects those that are out there in the trenches everyday.
Uh, military leaders against this, you say? You might want to read up more.
http://www.hrc.org/15114.htm
G.I.Jim wrote:You know what, maybe I'm jumping to conclusions here. I've stated my beliefs, but I'll sit back and see what happens. I've been wrong before, and i know I'll be wrong again. I hope for everyone's sake that it DOES turn out ok. I don't want to see anyone hurt or killed. Guess we'll see soon enough one way or the other.
BobbyinTN wrote:Sounds like every person I've ever encountered at work places. Everyone talks about their "sexuality" even when it's just mentioning a wife or a husband.
I think the problem is with the people who have the problem, not with the gay guy you're talking about.
Not everyone feels a need to conform and thank God they don't. I'd rather be around someone who is themselves rather than someone others want them to be.
donnaplease wrote:
I'll just wait and see how things go before I form an opinion on whether it was a wise decision or not.
parfait wrote:By the way, Angel. All this mouthy, though girl act isn't fooling anyone. What you need is some love and care - you're just going at it the wrong way. That special someone is out there. Hit me a PM in the meantime. I'm a good listener.
Rockindeano wrote:donnaplease wrote:
I'll just wait and see how things go before I form an opinion on whether it was a wise decision or not.
Huh? Anyone can simply wait it out to see what is best for the situation. The hard choices need to be made before seeing what transpires. I want to see what you believe to be the right decision, not what will turn out? The principle here is so clear it isn't funny. This was absolutely the right decision.
Don wrote:Okay let's see. All these miltaries listed below allow gays to serve openly. None of them seem to have fallen completely apart so far because of it. The U.S. however shared company with that great bastion of Democracy called Turkey with it's prohibition. Wow, bedfellows with muslims of all people, nice.
As I said earlier, I have done time in Europe and the Pacific and have seen a lot of gay personel serve with the majority of the peers knowing they are gay and it has not been an issue. With a few exceptions, only at bases in the states has it become a hotbed topic. From my own perspective, the miltary has greater problems such as spouse abuse, sexism, alcoholism nd even that big one, rasicm which is still out there, believe it or not.
As you can see, a lot of the countries below are allies who we have done exercises with and gone to combat with. In all honesty, looks like a lot of American troops may have possibly been in foxholes with people of a different orientation. If the only reason these Americans were okay with that is because they didn't know, well maybe it's time for them to make a career change.
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Republic of China
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Republic of Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Bermuda
Uruguay
SteveForever wrote:Don wrote:Okay let's see. All these miltaries listed below allow gays to serve openly. None of them seem to have fallen completely apart so far because of it. The U.S. however shared company with that great bastion of Democracy called Turkey with it's prohibition. Wow, bedfellows with muslims of all people, nice.
As I said earlier, I have done time in Europe and the Pacific and have seen a lot of gay personel serve with the majority of the peers knowing they are gay and it has not been an issue. With a few exceptions, only at bases in the states has it become a hotbed topic. From my own perspective, the miltary has greater problems such as spouse abuse, sexism, alcoholism nd even that big one, rasicm which is still out there, believe it or not.
As you can see, a lot of the countries below are allies who we have done exercises with and gone to combat with. In all honesty, looks like a lot of American troops may have possibly been in foxholes with people of a different orientation. If the only reason these Americans were okay with that is because they didn't know, well maybe it's time for them to make a career change.
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Canada
Republic of China
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Republic of Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
The Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Bermuda
Uruguay
Don, most of these countries don't have millions who are expected to militarize in combat and in expeditionary nature. They don't deploy and most aren't effective. A few like Swede and Norway are just social havens that are for NATO.
I still think gays should be allowed in the military, but you can't compare us to them.....this is the United States.
Don wrote:SteveForever
The big thing here, is we have had gays in the military for years. Many American commanders overseas have Totalitarian power over their facilties and for the most part accepted it that some members of their small communities were gay (with a wink and a nudge because it was NOT a big issue).
The Miltary has had a headstart on this for years. It will work itself out. It just takes educating, which has already been happening. The last decade has changed in many areas for the services. No longer can you join up to get a free ride because you had ten kids by the time you were 30 or you had problems with the law. The new soldier is far more educated than he was 40 years ago. The average ENLISTED Air force recruit comes though the door with an Associates degree and is 21. The days of pulling in not so bright 17 year old joes from the bayou are over.
Behshad wrote:Don wrote:SteveForever
The big thing here, is we have had gays in the military for years. Many American commanders overseas have Totalitarian power over their facilties and for the most part accepted it that some members of their small communities were gay (with a wink and a nudge because it was NOT a big issue).
The Miltary has had a headstart on this for years. It will work itself out. It just takes educating, which has already been happening. The last decade has changed in many areas for the services. No longer can you join up to get a free ride because you had ten kids by the time you were 30 or you had problems with the law. The new soldier is far more educated than he was 40 years ago. The average ENLISTED Air force recruit comes though the door with an Associates degree and is 21. The days of pulling in not so bright 17 year old joes from the bayou are over.
As always , great points sir !
Like Dean said , this is a very simple matter.
Who cares about peoples sexual preferences , if they're willing to risk their lives for you! Just deal with it and be appreciative instead of bitching from the comfort of your home !
Behshad wrote:Don wrote:SteveForever
The big thing here, is we have had gays in the military for years. Many American commanders overseas have Totalitarian power over their facilties and for the most part accepted it that some members of their small communities were gay (with a wink and a nudge because it was NOT a big issue).
The Miltary has had a headstart on this for years. It will work itself out. It just takes educating, which has already been happening. The last decade has changed in many areas for the services. No longer can you join up to get a free ride because you had ten kids by the time you were 30 or you had problems with the law. The new soldier is far more educated than he was 40 years ago. The average ENLISTED Air force recruit comes though the door with an Associates degree and is 21. The days of pulling in not so bright 17 year old joes from the bayou are over.
As always , great points sir !
Like Dean said , this is a very simple matter.
Who cares about peoples sexual preferences , if they're willing to risk their lives for you! Just deal with it and be appreciative instead of bitching from the comfort of your home !
Don wrote:SteveForever
The big thing here, is we have had gays in the military for years. Many American commanders overseas have Totalitarian power over their facilties and for the most part accepted it that some members of their small communities were gay (with a wink and a nudge because it was NOT a big issue).
The Miltary has had a headstart on this for years. It will work itself out. It just takes educating, which has already been happening. The last decade has changed in many areas for the services. No longer can you join up to get a free ride because you had ten kids by the time you were 30 or you had problems with the law. The new soldier is far more educated than he was 40 years ago. The average ENLISTED Air force recruit comes though the door with an Associates degree and is 21. The days of pulling in not so bright 17 year old joes from the bayou are over.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest