
Moderator: Andrew
G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
No, steveo will always look like the asshole ...we can't control that !!G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
Everett wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
Because cold heart isn't on the front page?
G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
Rick wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
I thought that was all set. Gotta be a good explanation for that.
Michigan Girl wrote:No, steveo will always look like the asshole ...we can't control that !!G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
Don wrote:Showing my ignorance here but why exactly should 'Cold Heart' be on the front page today?
G.I.Jim wrote:Rick wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I don't know what to say, except WOW! I'm at a loss for words here, and don't I look like the asshole.
I thought that was all set. Gotta be a good explanation for that.
Obviously there was some kind of communication break-down there. Guess I'll find out. Very disappointing though.
Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Ehwmatt wrote:Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Maybe Jim shoulda dealt with it privately, but here you are admitting on your own public forum that (1) you're not good for your word when it comes to transacting business and (2) that once you couldn't keep a business commitment, you elected not to communicate that fact to the person you were doing business with and chose to let him find out about the adverse business action after the fact.
Doesn't look good for you.
Behshad wrote:Saint John wrote:This thread is gonna get good. I can just tell.
Not fair as only one of them has the LOCK THREAD ability.Maybe Jim should create a poll about how they both should've handled this ?!
![]()
StevePerryHair wrote:We don't want to lose our poll function again!
Don wrote:Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Look on the bright side. At least you discovered the initial news of your screw up here at MR, not some other place.
Don wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Maybe Jim shoulda dealt with it privately, but here you are admitting on your own public forum that (1) you're not good for your word when it comes to transacting business and (2) that once you couldn't keep a business commitment, you elected not to communicate that fact to the person you were doing business with and chose to let him find out about the adverse business action after the fact.
Doesn't look good for you.
Was it an actual business transaction? Did money exchange hands?
Ehwmatt wrote:Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Maybe Jim shoulda dealt with it privately, but here you are admitting on your own public forum that (1) you're not good for your word when it comes to transacting business and (2) that once you couldn't keep a business commitment, you elected not to communicate that fact to the person you were doing business with and chose to let him find out about the adverse business action after the fact.
Doesn't look good for you.
Andrew wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Andrew wrote:It's a pity this couldn't be dealt with privately, but I shouldn't be surprised. Basically yes, it is my screw up. It was supposed to be on there, but I was planning a 2CD set. I don't have enough tracks for that or any time left to find more.
I've told Jim I would look into any possibilities to include it somehow. But the disc runs at 79 minutes already.
Maybe Jim shoulda dealt with it privately, but here you are admitting on your own public forum that (1) you're not good for your word when it comes to transacting business and (2) that once you couldn't keep a business commitment, you elected not to communicate that fact to the person you were doing business with and chose to let him find out about the adverse business action after the fact.
Doesn't look good for you.
I'm doing my best not to get really wound up here, but this is getting up my nose. Who are you to make these judgements against me? And since when have you been so judgemental?
This CD - is FREE for the bands to participate - doesn't cost them a cent. I just pick the best songs possible to represent the site and the genre. I told Jim I was going to do a ballads compilation. This track wasn't ready and needed work and they did that. But I am forced by the ECONOMY to make a single CD and not gamble on the concept of a all-ballads CD.
So I picked what tracks I had available, forgetting that Jim's track was actually now ready and that's that.
No need for these other insulting comments. I can't fit the track on, so I'll make it up to Jim. We all know that when Jim gets pissed, he posts about it regardless of consequences. I'd ask that you refrain from making such judgements and allow me to srt out this with Jim privately.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests