Kor'n wrote:Looking at that 10k bid, does not seem “his memory fading into the sunset” is pending.
Yeah, because one fan, or even a handful, bidding up for the opportunity to talk to Steve Perry really implies that the guy is as popular as ever. Fail.
Kor'n wrote: Self-serving Perry? Maybe you should read those ticket master reviews and direct your concerns elsewhere - "Favorite moment: When Neal Schon stopped playing” and it goes on and on. But surely it could not have been a “15 minute solo” for every song?? Now, that “reeks of a guy with some major misfiring going on between his ears.”
Listen, dummy, try not to comment until you have all of the facts ... or even some of them. I don't think there's been
one person on this board
more critical of Neal's soloing during this tour. So, again ... fail.
Kor'n wrote: Name one successful Journey album that does not bear the name of Steve Perry.
Fuck, this is easier than killing cockroaches with a flame thrower. I'll name 2. TBF was a complete shit fest. The reunion was predicated on a lie, and the ensuing album cost the label a ton of money. They didn't recoup their cash and the tour never happened. It "shipped" a million and was certified Platinum, but the true number of albums sold didn't sniff a million. Then, we were treated to GH Live ... another shit fest that was rushed, in an attempt to toss out some of the water that the record label was taking on from TBF.
Hell, even ROR was a (relative) failure. 2 million albums for Journey was about 6 months worth of sales back then. While Bon Jovi and Def Leppard were putting out rock albums that moved 10+ million (and each sold 25+ million worldwide), (Steve Perry's 70's) Journey decided that they were going to step back into the 70's and, for the most part, try to sound like George Clinton and Sly And The Family Stone. That hostile takeover saw rock's most popular band sell albums at a mediocre clip. And don't start barking about Top 40 hits, because Herbie already pointed out that those were easily bought. But albums sold were a true barometer of success. Going from 8 million to 2 million because of one member's hostile takeover, never to tour again afterward, seems an awful lot like an album that would have been better served being named "Freedom" and having the band's real members and sound (pop rock) included.
Kor'n wrote: He has a right to be paid; after-all, they’ve been playing the DD he helped create for what - 30 years.
He has a right to, and has always been paid for, mechanical royalties for radio play. Getting paid as a
touring member was nothing more than a shameless act of a man with a broken voice.
Kor'n wrote: And, judging by the recent colossal flop (Eclipse), that playing has and will go “on and on.” That sole “COH” was hanging in there by a thread. Is Tapegate what that “class-act” other Steve was party to in misleading the fans? Why blast Perry when one of real culprits is called a “class act?”
Nary an argument with this.
Kor'n wrote:Don’t saddle SP with the band’s deceit.
Bullshit. When you're ok with receiving a check for something you signed off for and/or you should be doing, and it's fraudulent, you're culpable. Period.
Kor'n wrote:It is also “worth mentioning” that Neal and Jon were there and agreed to all. They suited up and went on ROR tour, as happy as two larks. Neal’s band? And, Perry toured but not under the name “Journey” as he had asked the band, and he was entitled to that request.
Where's the vomit bag?!? You act as though he
chose to tour under his own name for his solo tour. I'm going to guess that a guy that was willing to fire the world's greatest drummer, the world's greatest manager and a founding member, in Ross Valory, would have
also been selfish enough to drag along the "Journey" name on his solo tour ... if he
could have.
Also, I don't ever recall Neal or Jon knocking on high school gym doors during the FTLOSM tour asking for an equal cut because they were "entitled to" their share for him predominantly performing Journey songs.
Kor'n wrote:As far as class goes - Steve Perry is the guy that withheld his signature from Sopranos until he was assured of no bloodshed for the song. Just think Sopranos is what started it all for DSB, yet Perry was willing to forego that. I believe Frank and Jesse had already signed, for it appears the James brothers were not concerned about a shootout.
Being concerned about bloodshed on a cable television show about organized crime is about as fucking sane as prohibiting cussing in a whorehouse. This was just another instance of the guy unable to let anything flow freely. Everything has to be extortive in nature. Operating on the level of a semi-retarded grade school kid with the "You have to tell me first!!!" mentality is neither classy nor of sound mind.