Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that it's going to receive a perfect 100%! Call me psychic.
Why?
I don't believe that at all. Got to hear it first.
Moderator: Andrew
Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that it's going to receive a perfect 100%! Call me psychic.
No reply?
G.I.Jim wrote:Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and speculate that it's going to receive a perfect 100%! Call me psychic.
No reply?
Why so defensive Andrew? Jeesh!![]()
Sorry I couldn't jump right back in here to respond, but I've worked 25 hours in the last 2 days. I was just messing with you. honestly, I'm sure I'm not far off though. You scored WET a perfect 100. I'm a huge fan of Robert's and we have worked together in the past. I LOVE WOA and he's a great guy. With that being said, I listened to the album (after your recommendation) and have never listened to it again. Music is all in how you interpret it, so there is no right or wrong. It's subjective. To me, that album had zero pieces to the puzzle that called me back for a second listen. I know many people loved it, but I just didn't get it. It sounded like more generic tunes from Frontiers Records, and I just didn't get that score at all.
You gave Winger's last album a 95%, and I love the HELL out of it. It's not my favorite, but to stand it up next to WET... I don't think there's a comparison. Van Halen only deserve a 90% for their last album, and it's all I've listened to since the day I bought it. It's not perfect, and to my ears there are 3 fillers on the album. I'm not exaggerating... it has not left my cd player in 2 weeks! And it's not perfect. Now to compare that to WET??? No comparison IMHO! To my ears, WET deserves maybe an 80%. Again, just my opinion and ears.
G.I.Jim wrote:To me, that album had zero pieces to the puzzle that called me back for a second listen. I know many people loved it, but I just didn't get it. It sounded like more generic tunes from Frontiers Records, and I just didn't get that score at all.
Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:To me, that album had zero pieces to the puzzle that called me back for a second listen. I know many people loved it, but I just didn't get it. It sounded like more generic tunes from Frontiers Records, and I just didn't get that score at all.
Amazing...I'm still playing it. Killer.
Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:To me, that album had zero pieces to the puzzle that called me back for a second listen. I know many people loved it, but I just didn't get it. It sounded like more generic tunes from Frontiers Records, and I just didn't get that score at all.
Amazing...I'm still playing it. Killer.
G.I.Jim wrote:Andrew wrote:G.I.Jim wrote:To me, that album had zero pieces to the puzzle that called me back for a second listen. I know many people loved it, but I just didn't get it. It sounded like more generic tunes from Frontiers Records, and I just didn't get that score at all.
Amazing...I'm still playing it. Killer.
Well, I'm glad you like it.
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests